Advanced Search Results

Kanshi Nath Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 7, 13(2), 13(3), 13(5) and 16; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rule 53

Reported in : 124(2005)DLT413; 2005(84)DRJ506

Advocate for Respondent : Sunil Sharma, Adv.

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. This revision petition is directed against the judgment and/or order dated 17.04.2003 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge whereby the petitioner's appeal against the judgment dated 29.10.1990 and order on sentence...

Sh. Gautam JaIn and anr. Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 7; Essential Commodities (Special Provisions) Act, 1981 - Sections 12A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 420, 468 and 471; Newsprint Control Order, 1962; defense of India Rules, 1962 - Rule 132A; defense of India (Amendment) Rules, 1965

Reported in : 129(2006)DLT477

Advocate for Respondent : R.M. Tiwari, Adv.

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. These 8 revision petitions raise common issues, although there are separate orders which are impugned in these petitions. Some of the accused are also common in these petitions. The broad facts are...

Shafiq Ahmad Vs. District Magistrate, Meerut and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 87 and 88; Constitution of India - Article 32

Reported in : 1990AIHC220; 1990CriLJ573; 1989(3)Crimes278(SC); JT1989(3)SC659; 1989(2)SCALE565; (1989)4SCC556; [1989]Supp1SCR56; AIR 1990 SC 220

Advocate for Respondent : Anil Dev Singh, ; Yogeshwar Prasad, ; Kitty Kumar Mangalam,

Sabyasachi Mukharji, J.1. This petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenges the detention of the petitioner-a detenu, under Section 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980 (hereinafter called 'the Act'). The petitioner is a bachelor....

Union of India Vs. Kewal Krishan Mittal

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Constitution of India - Article 311; Bar Council of India Rules - Rule 51; Fundamental Rules - Rule 54(3)

Reported in : AIR1984Delhi38; 25(1984)DLT24; 1984RLR20

Avadh Behari, J.(1) The single question in these proceedings is whether this court can issue a direction to the Union of India for the payment of arrears of salary to the Government servant after the dismissal...

Rajesh Kumar Jain vs Shri Chetan Prakash Jain & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~18 to 20 & 22* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 6th February, 2026 Uploaded on: 10th February, 2026 ~18 + CONT.APP.(C) 2/2026 & CM APPL. 8303/2026, CM APPL. RAGHUNATH SINGH...

Maharaj Singh & Ors. vs Shri Chetan Prakash Jain & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~18 to 20 & 22* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 6th February, 2026 Uploaded on: 10th February, 2026 ~18 + CONT.APP.(C) 2/2026 & CM APPL. 8303/2026, CM APPL. RAGHUNATH SINGH...

Somnath Bobal vs.state ( Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

$ 1 to 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Pronounced on:05th May, 2017 BAIL APPLN. 2371/2014 and Crl. M.A. 1451/2015, 1845/2015, 1846/2015 and 792/2016 SOMNATH BOBAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr....

Pushpender and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)(91)SLJ238CAT

1. As the facts are interwoven with identical question of law, for the sake of brevity and to avoid multiplicity, these O.As. are being disposed of by this common order.2. At the outset, after allowing all...

Rajat Gupta vs.rupali Gupta

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. S. Chaudhary, Ms. Aarzoo Aneja, Mr. Rajat Aneja, Ms. Chandrika Gupta, Ms. Renu Verma, Mr. Prashant Mendiratta, Ms. Sunieta Ojha, Mr. Ashisht Bhagat, Mr. Akhil Suri, Mr. Vivek Singh, Mr. Randhir Kumar

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. 05.2018 + REFERENCE IN CONT.CAS(C) 772/2013, 347/2013, 484/2014, 584/2014, 648/2014, 48/2016, 483/2016, 484/2016, 1147/2016, 1116/2016, 1251/2016, 78/2017, 132/2017, 197/2017, 204/2017, 216/2017 and 270/2017...

Padmanath Sarmah Vs. Hitendra Nath Goswami and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : ServiceElection

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 99, 99(1), 100 and 123(7); Assam State Electricity Board Act; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 5, 5(4), 5(5), 33, 60 and 78A; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 12; Assam Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964

Advocate for Respondent : B.D. Das, S.S. Dey, M. Nath, Rahman Ali, Sima Rani Dey, N.C. Sarma, J.D Deb, Kashem Ali, A.K. Bhattacharjee, K. Agarwal, B.K. Singh and A. Hazarika, Advs.

D. Biswas, J.1. Both the petitioner Shri Padmanath Sarmah, hereinafter referred to as the 'election petitioner', and Shri Hitendra Nath Goswami (respondent No. 1), hereinafter referred to as the 'returned candidate', along with others took part...