Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr mehta · Page 1 of about 2,177 results (0.224 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 06 2001

Om Prakash Joshi, Advocate and ors Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-06-2001

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 24, 24(1), 24(4), 24(8), 35 and 321; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 13(3), 14, 16, 16(1), 124(2), 126, 162, 163, 165, 165(2), 165(3), 216, 217, 217(1), 217(2), 222, 222(1), 226, 319, 361(1), 367 and 368 ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(7) - Order 3, Rule 4(2) and Rule 4(6); General Clauses Act - Sections 13; Advocates Act, 1961 ;

Reported in : AIR2002Raj33; 2001(3)WLC199; 2001(3)WLN632

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Mehta, Adv. General and; D. Maheshwari, Adv.

Lakshmanan, C.J. (1). The petitioners in the instant writ petition are the practicing advocates at Jodhpur. They filed the writ petition with the followingprayers:-'It is, therefore, prayed that a writ, direction or order or in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 2008

Sicom Ltd. Vs. Parca Paper Industries Limited and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-02-2008

Subject : Banking

Acts : State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29, 31, 31(1), 31(2), 32, 32(1), 32(1A), 32(6), 32(7) and 99; State Financial Corporation (Amendment) Act, 1985; Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 - Schedule - Articles 1 and 7; Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 137; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2) and 51

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR7; 2008(5)BomCR524; (2008)110BOMLR2849; 2009(1)MhLj921

Advocate for Respondent : G.R. Mehta, Adv.;G.W. Mattos, A.G.P

Roshan Dalvi, J.1. The Petitioner granted a loan of Rs. 4.37 crores to Respondent No. 1. Respondent Nos.2 to 7 guaranteed the repayment of the said loan under deeds of personal guarantee and corporate guarantees executed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 2011

Progetto Grano S.P.A. Vs. Shri Lal Mahal Limited

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-07-2011

Subject : Arbitration and Conciliation

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 49, 48; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 3 Rule 4

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mahendra Rana, Adv.

1. By this order I shall dispose of the objections raised by the defendant vide the affidavit dated 10.08.2011 to Mr. Jayant K.Mehta, Advocate appearing on behalf of the plaintiff. The affidavit has been filed on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 17 1993

State of Orissa Vs. Mohd. Yunus and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-17-1993

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Reported in : 1994Supp(2)SCC55

K. Ramaswamy and; N.P. Singh, JJ.1. We have heard the counsel on either side. Leave granted.2. This appeal arises against the order of the tribunal made in O.A. No. 1005 of 1989 dated March 22, 1993....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 1986

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Chaturbhuj Bhanwarlal

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-26-1986

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 271(1)

Reported in : [1987]166ITR659(Raj); 1987(1)WLN74

Advocate for Respondent : Rajesh Balia, Adv.

M.C. Jain, J.1. This reference has been made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur, under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.2. The facts in brief are that the assessee is a Hindu undivided...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 1965

State of Bombay (Now Maharashtra) Vs. Narul Latif Khan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-22-1965

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 311, 311(2) and 353; Public Servants Inquiries Act, 1850

Reported in : AIR1966SC269; (1966)IILLJ595SC; 1966MhLJ46(SC); [1965]3SCR135

Gajendragadkar, C.J.1. The short question of law which arises in this appeal is whether theappellant, the State of Bombay (now Maharashtra), shows that its predecessorState of Madhya Pradesh (hereinafter called the Government) had given areasonable opportunity...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 1992

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. New India Industries Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-24-1992

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 6, 9, 10, 12, 14, 17, 17(1), 17(3), 22, 28, 30, 31, 32, 32(1), 33, 34, 35, 36, 36(1), 37, 37(1), 38, 38(2), 39, 40, 41(1) and 80J

Reported in : (1992)106CTR(Guj)374; [1993]201ITR208(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : D.A. Mehta, Adv.

S.D. Shah, J. 1. On being moved under section 256 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, by the Commissioner of Income-tax, Ahmedabad, by four Reference Applications Nos. 523 to 526/Add. of 1976-77, and also being moved by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2009

In Re: Reliance Petroleum Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-29-2009

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391(1) and 391(2); Constitution of India - Article 226; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959

Reported in : [2010]154CompCas286(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : Harin P. Raval, Addl. Solicitor General,; Vishwas K. Shah,;

Jayant Patel, J.1. The present petition is preferred by the petitioning transferor company-M/s. Reliance Petroleum Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'RPL' for the sake of convenience), seeking sanction to the scheme of amalgamation with the transferee...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 1984

Suzan Mal Vs. Bhanwar Lal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-24-1984

Subject : Property

Reported in : 1984WLN(UC)195

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mehta

S.S. Byas, J.1. This is plaintiff's civil second appeal who lost their suit in respect of easementary right of light and air in both the courts below.2. The lower appellate court of the District Judge, Partapgarh...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 1992

Shri Iqbal and ors. Vs. His Holiness Dr. Syedna Mohd. BarhanuddIn Saha ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-20-1992

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1992(2)WLC137; 1992(1)WLN511

N.K. Jain, J. 1. These are defendants' appeals against the order dt. 14.11.91 passed by the learned District Judge, Udaipur whereby he has allowed the plaintiffs' application dt. 20.5.85 for grant of temporary injunction under Order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial