Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr madon · Page 1 of about 114 results (0.079 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 04 1993

Ramesh Kumar Jhamb and Another Vs. Official Assignee, High Court, Bomb ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-04-1993

Subject : Civil

Acts : Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 - Sections 55; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 111; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 28

Reported in : AIR1993Bom374; 1993(3)BomCR461

Advocate for Respondent : N.R. Bathena Official Assignee and ;S.H. Doctor and ;R.H. Mirza, Advs. i/b.; Doctor & Co.

ORDERPendse, J. 1. This is an appeal preferred to challenge Order dated September 4, 1990, passed by learned Insolvency Judge on report dated March 15, 1989, made by the Official Assignee in Insolvency Petition No. 80...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 1957

Dr. Mafaldo U. Mascarenhas Vs. Annie Dias

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-22-1957

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1958)60BOMLR369

Mody, J.1. His Lordship after dealing with questions not material to this report, proceeded Questions Nos. 7 and 8 are again co-related. These two questions involve the construction of the latter part of the said Clause...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 16 2014

Mina Srinivasan Krishnan and Another Vs. Arun Bhaskar Adarkar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-16-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Dharmadhikari, J. 1. This Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent challenges the order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court dated 03rd April, 2012 on the Notice of Motion No.1548/2011 in Suit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 21 2014

Rakesh Malhotra and Others Vs. Rajinder Kumar Malhotra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-21-2014

Subject : Arbitration

G.S. Patel, J. 1. Is a dispute brought before the Company Law Board invoking the provisions of Sections 397, 398 and 402 of the Companies Act, 1956 at all referable to a private tribunal, viz., an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 20 2002

P.R. Shah Shares and Stock Brokers (P.) Ltd. Vs. Bhh Securities (P.) L ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-20-2002

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : 2002(4)ALLMR789; 2002(6)BomCR776; 2002(4)MhLj195

Advocate for Respondent : D.D. Madon, ;D.R. Mehta and ;Nilesh Shah, Advs.

S.A. Bobde, J.1. This petition is filed by the petitioners, viz., P.R. Shah Shares & Stock Brokers (P.) Ltd. against the award dated 12-10-1999 passed by the arbitrators of the Mumbai Stock Exchange under the Rules,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 1999

M. Sreenivasulu Reddy and ors. Vs. Kishore R. Chhabria and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-19-1999

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 6, 87, 111 and 111A; Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 - Sections 11, 11B, 15I, 15Y and 20A; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1994 - Regulations 2, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 33, 37, 39; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 - Regulations 10, 11 and 12

Reported in : [2002]109CompCas18(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Harish Salve, Senior Advocate, ;T.N. Subramaniam, ;R.K. Krishnamurthi, ;Abeezar E. Faizullabhoy and ;Ranjit Bhonsale, Advs. for Defendant No. 1 in Suit No. 3910 of 1997, ;Rafique Dada, Senior Adv., ;A

H.L. Gokhale, J.1. The notices of motion in Suit No. 3910 of 1997 seek to challenge the legality and validity of substantial acquisitions of shares by defendants Nos. 1 to 11 in defendant No. 12-company allegedly...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 1999

M/S. K.G. Construction and Another Vs. Municipal Corporation for Great ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-13-1999

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 73; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 12, 226; Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959

Reported in : 1999(4)ALLMR142; 1999(4)BomCR729; (1999)3BOMLR339

Advocate for Respondent : D.H. Mehta, ;M.B. Rao and ;Mrs. N.V. Sanglikar, Advs., i/b. ;A.H. Chedda

ORDERB.N. Srikrishna, J.1. These two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugn the action of the 1st respondent in treating the tenders submitted by the petitioners as 'Non-Responsive' and eliminating them from...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2014

Jaspal Sawhney Vs. Joginder Sawhney and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-11-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Petitioner (original plaintiff) has prayed for leave under clause XII of the Letters Patent, 1865 to file the suit (L) No.494 of 2014 against the defendants in this court. The defendants has opposed the prayer...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2014

Sharayu Ramkrishna Mhatre and Another Vs. Chandrakant Ramkrishna Mhatr ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-01-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Prem Malhotra

1. Applicants who are original plaintiffs have filed chamber summons no.55 of 2014 inter alia praying for amendment to the plaint as per schedule appended thereto. The applicants seek to implead two of the parties as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 2015

Narendra Mohan Singh @ Sanjay Singh, Sole Proprietor of M/s. Sanjay Si ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-20-2015

Subject : Right to Information

G.S. Patel, J. 1. This is an application for an injunction against the release on Friday, 21st August 2015 of a film âManjhi â“ The Mountain Manâ? directed by the 1st Defendant, Ketan Mehta. The Plaintiffsâ™...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial