Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr m k sarkar · Page 1 of about 5 results (0.204 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 28 2010

Sharwan Kumar Damani and ors.Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-28-2010

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. M. K. Sarkar, Adv.

The Court : One of the grounds in this writ application is that the Kolkata Municipal Corporation has not dealt with the application of the petitioners before the Director General (Building). He was required to consider...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 13 1991

M.N. Dastur and Co. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-13-1991

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1992)40ITD521(Kol.)

1. These two cross appeals one by the assessee and the other by the department are directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) for the assessment year 1985-86. The main issue involved relates...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2006

Rajiv Ranjan Singh 'Lalan' and Anr. Vs. Union of India (UOi) and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-21-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 173(8); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 32, 226, 233 and 235; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 131, 131(1A), 131A, 139, 147, 148, 149(1), 260A and 273A; Evidence Act

Reported in : 2006(6)ALD103(SC); (2006)205CTR(SC)53; [2006(4)JCR89(SC)]; JT2006(8)SC328; 2006(8)SCALE161; (2006)6SCC613; 2007(12) SCC 687

Advocate for Respondent : G.E. Vahanvati, S.G., ; Mohan Parasaran, A.S.G., ; Ram Jethma

K.G. Balakrishnan, J.1. These writ petitions are filed as Public Interest Litigation by the two petitioners herein who were Members of the Parliament at the time of filing the petitions. Respondent nos. 4 and 5 were...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 21 2006

Rajiv Ranjan Singhlalan and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-21-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)205CTR(SC)512; [2006]156TAXMAN512(SC)

K.G. Balakrishnan, J.These writ petitions are filed as public interest litigation by the two petitioners herein who were Members of the Parliament at the time of filing the petitions. Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 were formerly...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 2011

/S Titanor Components Ltd. Vs. Cit and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-04-2011

Subject : Income Tax

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 260A, 80IA

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, Adv.

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment Yes2. To be referred to Reporters or not Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported Yes in the Digest ?1. This is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial