Advanced Search Results

Ajai Kumar JaIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)(1)SLJ377CAT

1. The present O.A. is filed for quashing the order of suspension of the applicant dated 17.6.2000 and issuing direction to respondents to allow him to reinstate and join service of Additional Commissioner of Police, Central...

The Commissioner of Customs Vs. Inu Exports (P) Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Service Tax

1. Revenue has filed this appeal against the OIA No. 21/2001-Cus dated 07.08.2001 passed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise Appeals), Bangalore.2. The respondents imported and cleared RBD Palmolein vide Bill of Entry dated...

S.N. Thapa and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2003)(1)SLJ201CAT

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A.B. Belkar

1. The applicants in the above five O. As have impugned the action of the respondents in issuing the orders dated 7.2.1996. In those orders, it has been stated that the President is satisfied that under...

Swan Mills Ltd. and Another Vs. H.R. Amarnani and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1991LC306(Bombay); 1982(10)ELT445(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. M.I. Sethna

1. By the impugned order dated November 20, 1978, the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Bombay, held that the products covered by the classification list filed by the petitioners herein Messrs Swan Mills Limited in respect...

Shivrati Textiles Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2004)(93)ECC405

1. Appellant is a 100% EOU engaged in the manufacture of Texturised Filament Yarn, Dyed Yarn and Twisted Yarn. Pursuant to a search warrant, officers of Central Excise visited the factory premises on 24/01/2003 and they...

Everest Mudranalay Vs. J.F. Silva, Superintendent of C. Ex.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3

Reported in : 1990(47)ELT315(Bom)

1. The short question for determination... and to which question alone this petition is restricted at the time of its final hearing... relates to the validity of Notification No. 155 of 1972 (hereinafter the impugned notification)...

Taparia Overseas (P) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Import (Control) Order, 1955; Customs Act - Sections 46

Reported in : 2003(1)ALLMR846; 2003(2)BomCR7; 2003(161)ELT47(Bom); 2003(2)MhLj532

Advocate for Respondent : M.I. Sethna, Sr. Counsel, ;R. Asokan and ;K.R. Chaudhari, Advs., i/b., ;T.C. Kaushik, Adv.

V.C. Daga, J.1. The legal debate raised in these conjoint petitions centers around common saying from law books, that fraud vitiates everything. This debate is raised in the petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution...

Noble Asset Company Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 125(2) and 129E

Reported in : [2006]132CompCas543(Bom); 2005(187)ELT438(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : M.I. Sethna, Sr. Counsel, ;A.M. Sethna, ;Chirag Balsara and ;Raju Gawde, Advs., i/b., K. Ashraf & Co.

ORDER1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Taken up for hearing by consent of parties.This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), respondent No....

National Radio and Electronics Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section4

Reported in : 1983LC77D(Bombay); 1983(12)ELT214(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R. L. Dalal

1. The petition challenges an order of the second respondent dated 1st July, 1981 disallowing the deduction claimed by the petitioners for post-manufacturing expenses in arriving at the assessable value of their products for the purposes...

Smt. Vimla Devi G. Maheshwari and anr. Vs. D.D. Mohindra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyDirect Taxation

Acts : Income - Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269UD; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(3)ALLMR317; 2004(5)BomCR263; (2004)190CTR(Bom)306; [2004]268ITR102(Bom); 2004(4)MhLj58

Advocate for Respondent : M.I. Sethna and ;R. Ashokan, Advs. for Respondents Nos. 1 and 2 and ;R. Murlidhar, Adv. for Respondent No. 4

R.M. Lodha J.1. In respect of the immovable property being Flat No. 16, 4th Floor, 'D' Road, Churchgate, Bombay, owned by respondent No. 3, Shri Nandlal G. Kejriwal, the petitioners entered into an agreement on July...