Advanced Search Results

M/S.Karpara Project Engineering Vs.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.Krishna Srinivas, Adv.

J U D G M E N T1. This Appeal has been preferred by the unsuccessful plaintiff in so far as the dismissal of the Suit against the 3rd defendant/ 3rd respondent is concerned in C.S.No.623...

India Pistons Limited Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Madra ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 223-A; Central Excise Act - Sections 11-A; Central Excises Act - Sections 35, 35-B(2), 35-EE and 35-EE(2); Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 - Rule 41

Reported in : 1987(12)ECC243; 1987(27)ELT651(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : T. Somasundaram, Standing Counsel

1. Admit. 2. The petitioner is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. It engaged inter alia in the manufacture of motor vehicle parts and accessories falling under Tariff Item No. 34A of the Central...

India Pistons Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1999(113)ELT793(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : Shri V.T. Gopalan, Adv. for ;S. Udayakumar, A.C.C.S.C.

ORDER1. The petitioner is a company engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of motor vehicle parts and accessories, falling under Chapter No. 84.09 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to...

Glory Jeeva Rita Vs. Executive Director, Bharat Petroleum Corporation ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9, 17, 22, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41 and 42; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 18 and 41; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14(1), 23 and 41; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 38, Rule 5 - Order 39; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : 2008(3)ARBLR588(Madras)

Advocate for Respondent : Krishna Srinivas, Adv. for; Ramasubramanian, Adv.

S. Rajeswaran, J.1. OA No. 441 of 2008 has been filed to suspend the order of termination passed by the third respondent vide Ref. TCN.LPG.JOTHI dated 18.01.2008 pending proceedings of the arbitrator.OA No. 442 of 2008...

India Pistons Limited Represented by Its Director K.V. Shetty Vs. Unio ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1997)1MLJ259

ORDERN.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. The petitioner is a company engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of motor vehicle parts and accessories, falling under Chapter No. 84.09 of Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred...

South India Viscose Ltd. Vs. Cegat

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 57A, 57F(2) and 57G

Reported in : 1995(77)ELT280(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : Shri Ramakrishna Reddy, Addl. Central Govt. standing Counsel

ORDER1. When the petition for stay filed by the Writ Petitioner and the petition for vacating stay filed by the respondents-Department camp up for hearing, arguments were addressed at considerable length and the issues raised also...

Cce Vs. Sail

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2000)LC129Tri(Chennai)

1. The matter has been listed for passing final order in terms of Section 35K read with 35C of the Central Excise Act.2. The Collector of Central Excise, Coimbatore was aggrieved with the Order-in-Appeal No. 249/87...