Advanced Search Results

Laxmi Chand Agarwal Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 58, 69A and 69A(4)

Reported in : AIR1962All117

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Khare, Adv. and ;Shambhu Pd., Standing Counsel

Jagdish Sahai, J.1. The petitioner Laxmi Chand Agarwal is the Executive Officer of the Municipal Board, Hapur (hereinafter referred to as the Board), having been appointed to that post in the year 1931. Sri K. C....

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. D.C. Dhiman and Brothers

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1963]14STC473(All)

Advocate for Respondent : J. Sarup, Adv.

S.C. Manchanda, J.1. The question referred for decision to this Court under Section 11 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act is whether in the circumstances and on the facts of the case the assessee came within...

Dev Raj Dogra and Others Vs. Gyan Chand JaIn and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 64 and 151 - Order 21, Rules 58, 63, 95 and 96 - Order 34, Rule 1; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 30, 52, 58, 65-A and 65-A(2); -

Reported in : AIR1981SC981; 1981(29)BLJR412; 1981(1)SCALE663; (1981)2SCC675; [1981]3SCR174; 1981(13)LC641(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Kacker, ; S.N. Mehta, ; P.N. Puri, ;

1. The principal question which falls for determination in this appeal by Special Leave granted by this Court, is whether Gyan Chand Jain, the Respondent No. 1 in this appeal, who purchased a two and half...

Dev Pal Singh Vs. Vice-chancellor, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1992All163

Advocate for Respondent : Dinesh Kakkar, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner has been dropped for two semesters i.e. I and II semesters 1990/91. The University campus and its farm were declared out of bounds for him. He was placed on conduct probation throughout his...

Haji Abdul Shakoor Vs. the Rent Control and Eviction Officer, Kanpur a ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 - Sections 7, 7(1) and 7(2); Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 5 and 6; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23

Reported in : AIR1959All440

Advocate for Respondent : Shambu Prasad and ;S.N. Kakar, Advs. and ;Standing Counsel

ORDERS.S. Dhavan, J. 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for the quashing of an order of Rent Control and Eviction Officer Kanpur (respondent No. 1) dated 10-9-1956, declaring a godown...

Harnandan Prasad Vs. B. Kamta Prasad Kakkar and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1934All376

Sulaiman, C.J.1. I concur in the conclusion of my learned brother that this appeal should be dismissed. In my opinion it is quite sufficient to hold that even if the defendant was disqualified, the plaintiff was...

Rajinder Kumar Kindra Vs. Delhi Administration Through Secretary (Labo ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10A; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226

Reported in : AIR1984SC1805; [1984(49)FLR424]; 1986LabIC374; (1984)IILLJ517SC; 1984(2)SCALE428; (1984)4SCC635; [1985]1SCR866; 1984(2)SLJ492(SC); 1985(17)LC465(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Pawan Kumar Jain and ; K.K. Gupta, Advs.

D.A. Desai, J.1. Appellant Rajinder Kumar Kindra was inducted as a peon by M/s. Raymond Woolen Mills. Ltd. ('employer' for short). In 1972 he was promoted as a Salesman and at the relevant time he was...

State of Uttar Pradesh and ors. Vs. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. and ... Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Excise (Amendment) 1976; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; U.P. Excise (Amendment) (Re-enactment and Validation) Act, 1976 - Sections 4; Government of India Act, 1935; Constitution of India - Article 47; Bihar Mines and Minerals Concession Rules - Rule 20; Reforms Act- Sections 10(2); The United Provinces Excise Act, 1910 - Sections 3(1), 12, 12(1), 13, 17, 18, 24, 28, 30, 31, 40 and 41; Government of India (Adaptation of Indian Laws) Order, 1927; Government (Adaptation of Indian Law) Order, 1937; Punjab Act, 1914; Uttar Pradesh Excise Amendment - 1972; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949; Punjab Act, 1914

Reported in : AIR1980SC614; (1980)2SCC441; [1980]2SCR531

P.S. Kailasam, J.1. These batches of Civil Appeals, Writ Petitions and Special Leave Petitions raise the same question and can be disposed of by a common judgment.2. C.A. No. 1130/76 is by the State. The other...

indra and Co. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : 1971WLN686

L.N. Chhangani, J.1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Delhi Bench, 'B' has state a case and referred to us the following questions of law under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for our answer:1....

Vishal Narula Vs. State of N.C.T. of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Isha Khanna

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: March 12, 2014 Decision on: March 18, 2014 CRL.A. No.248 of 2008 VISHAL NARULA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Kakkar, Advocate. versus STATE OF...