Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr k subramaniam · Page 1 of about 19 results (0.112 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 29 1995

In Re: Rajendran and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-29-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 143, 332, 342, 365 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 317

Reported in : 1996CriLJ1956

Arunachalam, J.1. A storm, not one natural, had blown over the campus, which accommodates the Courts of certain Metropolitan Magistrates and Judicial Magistrates, in Saidapet on 26-7-1995. The unusual impact of the storm had led to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2005

Sree Akilandeswari Mills Private Limited Vs. the Deputy Commissioner, ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-28-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act; Payment of Gratuity Act - Sections 4(1); Income Tax Act - Sections 40A(7); Bonus Act

Reported in : (2006)200CTR(Mad)315; [2005]274ITR1(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : K. Subramaniam, Sr. Standing Counsel

N.V. Balasubramanian, J. 1. These appeals arise out of the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the 'Tribunal') in I.T.A. Nos. 1092/Mds/1991 and 2402/Mds/1991 dated 14.8.2001 in respect of two assessment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2005

Union of India (Uoi), Represented by the Director General, All India R ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-29-2005

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Preventive Detention Act, 1950 - Sections 11(1); Government of India (Transaction of Business) Rules, 1961 - Rule 3; Central Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rule 33; Constitution of India - Articles 74, 74(1), 77, 77(1), 77(2), 77(3), 166 and 166(1)

Reported in : 2005(2)CTC661; (2005)3MLJ310

Advocate for Respondent : V.T. Gopalan, Additional Solicitor General for ;S. Udayakumar, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 14913 and 45135/2002, ;K. Subramaniam, Sr. Counsel for Rabu Manohar, Adv. in W.Ps. 24444 to 24451/2001 and ;L. Chandra

ORDERR. Balasubramanian, J.1. The first respondent in W.P.Nos. 24444/2001 to 24451/2001 is the respective pensioner retired from Government of India service. The writ petitioner in W.P.No. 14913/2002 is the first respondent/pensioner in W.P.No. 24450/2001. The first...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 29 2009

Tube Investments of India Limited Represented by Its Vice President, T ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-29-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(24), 5, 9(1), 10A, 10A(1A), 10B, 28 to 43C, 43D, 44AC, 64, 72, 80, 80(IA), 80(IE), 143C, 145, 153, 192, 193, 194, 194A, 194C, 194C(1), 194D, 194G, 194H, 194I, 194J, 194LA, 195, 195(5), 195A, 197, 198, 199, 200, 200(1), 201, 201(1), 201(1A), 205, 206C, 221, 271C, 276B and 276BB; Hindu Women's Right to Property Act; Companies Act; Finance Act, 1983; Finance Act, 2007; Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 11D; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 11(4); Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 13(4), 17 and 17(2); Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1966 - Sections 47(3); Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; Partnership Act, 1932 -

Reported in : (2009)226CTR(Mad)313; [2009]185TAXMAN438(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : Pushya Sitaraman, Sr. Standing Counsel

ORDERF.M. Ibrahim Kalifulla, J.1. The petitioners in W.P. No. 10750 of 2009, seek for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first and the second respondent to forbear from relying upon the provisions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 09 2012

G.Ramamoorthy Vs. the Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-09-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) - Section 482; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227

This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus to forbear the second respondent herein from proceeding further on the basis of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2014

Hindustan Unilever Limited, a Company Incorporated Under the Companies ...

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on : Apr-04-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

(CIRCUIT SITTING AT MUMBAI) ORDER (No.43 of 2014) K.N. Basha, Chairman The petitioner who is the respondent No.3 in the appeal preferred this Miscellaneous Petition raising a preliminary objection questioning the maintainability of the appeal preferred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 1993

JaIn Commission of Enquiry

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-02-1993

Subject : Civil

Acts : Commissions of Enquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8B and 8C; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 16; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : 51(1993)DLT624

ORDEROn June 1. 1993, the Commission passed a short Order stating that a detailed reasoned Order will follow. The Commission records the following detailed reasoned Order :Backdrop 1.1 Shri Rajiv Gandhi, former Prime Minister of India,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 2004

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Smt. Sulochana Legal Rep. of Late P. Sa ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-21-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 260A

Reported in : 2004(5)CTC410; [2005]272ITR529(Mad)

ORDERP.D. Dinakaran, J.1. Heard. The appeal is preferred against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras Bench 'D' dated 21.05.2003 in I.T.A. Nos. 1619,1620,1621 and 1622/98, holding that the reassessments for the assessment years...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 2005

Parkside Explosives and Industries Ltd. (Now Known as Matheson Bosanqu ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-17-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2005]278ITR561(Mad)

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following question of law :'2. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the appellant was not entitled...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2004

Cit Vs. South India Viscose Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-08-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2005]143TAXMAN360(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. P. P. S. Janarthana Raja

N. Kannadasan J.The above appeal was admitted, whereby the following substantial questions of law were formulated.'(1) Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessee...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial