Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr k s roy and · Page 1 of about 5 results (0.309 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 25 1995

G.S. Cherra Vs. Hindustan Steelworks Construction Limited

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-25-1995

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 5 and 28

Reported in : (1995)2CALLT1(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Adv. General, ;K.S. Roy and ;Avijit Banerjee, Advs.

Shyamal Kumar Sen, J.1. This is an application for extention of time to file the award under Section 28 of the Arbitration Act. This application has been seriously opposed by the respondent on the ground that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 1999

Simon Rajan Vs. Anita Simon Rajan

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-03-1999

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 3(3), 10 and 23;; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 8, Rule 5

Reported in : (1999)2CALLT137(HC),I(2000)DMC116

The Court 1. The plaintiff instituted the suit fn the form of an application under section 10 or section 23 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 whichever will be applicable in the present case.2. The cause...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 1996

Puspa Mondal Vs. Nirmala Mondal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-20-1996

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 22 Rule 4; ; Indian Succession Act - Section 306

Reported in : I(1997)DMC222

Advocate for Respondent : Haradhan Banerjee, ; Sambhu Nath Samanta and ; Subrata Roy Karmakar, Advs.

Basudeva Panigrahi, J.1. This revision is directed against Order No. 30 dated 29th June, 1994 passed by the District Judge. Howrah on an application under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the C.P.C. allowing the opposite party...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 28 1998

Kakali Mukherjee Vs. Gautam Mukherjee

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-28-1998

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1980 - Sections 13(1), 21 and 115 - Order 32, Rule 15;; Hindu Marriage Act, 1995 - Section 13

Reported in : (1999)1CALLT124(HC),II(1999)DMC115

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. K.S. Roy and ;Ms. Tapasi Sengupta, Advs.

B. Bhattacharya, J 1. This revlslonal application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure ('Code') is at the instance of a wife/respondent in a suit for divorce under the provision of section 13(1)(iii) of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 1995

Hindustan Steelworks Construction Ltd. Vs. G.S. Cherra and Company and ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-05-1995

Subject : ArbitrationCivil

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 5, 11, 12 and 28

Reported in : (1996)1CALLT120(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Roy and ;Samir Banerjee, Advs.

Altamas Kabir, J.1. This is an application under sections 5, 11 and 12 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, filed by Hindustan Steelworks Construction Ltd. for removal of the Joint Arbitrators nominated by the parties and for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial