Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr k ramachandran · Page 1 of about 16 results (0.183 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 15 2012

Ramachandran Vs. Govindasamy(Died) and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-15-2012

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 20; Code of Civil Procedure,(CPC) 1908 - Section 100

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.K.Ramachandran, Adv.

Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the Judgment and Decree dated 29.4.2004 in A.S.No.22 of 2003 on the file of the court of Principal Subordinate Judge at Nagapattinam reversing the judgment and decree...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 2011

Mr.K Ramachandran Pillai Vs. Banking Division

Court : Central Information Commission CIC

Decided on : Oct-04-2011

Subject : Right to Information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SM/C/2011/000793/SG/15044 Complaint No. CIC/SM/C/2011/000793/SG Complainant : Mr. K Ramachandran Pillai Konginisseril Thekkethil Shaktikulangara Kollam-691581 Deputy Manager HDFC Bank...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 2007

M.L. Joseph Francis, District and Sessions Vs. Sri. Thomas P. Joseph,

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-20-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Kerala Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1960; Indian Administrative Service/Indian Police Service (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955 - Rule 5(2); Indian Forest Service (Pay) Rules, 1968 - Rule 3(3); KS and SS Rules - Rules 1, 2, 2(16), 5, 7, 28, 28(4), 28(10) and 29

Reported in : 2007(3)KLT724

Advocate for Respondent : Bechu Kurian Thomas, Adv.

K. Balakrishnan Nair, J.1. These nine Writ Appeals arise out of the common Judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 20.12.2006, in Writ Petition (C) Nos.17897, 18004 and 18608 of 2006. Three of the Appeals have...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 08 2011

K. Abraham Mathew, Kottayam and Others Vs. State of Kerala, Rep. by Ch ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-08-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. The rights and liberties flowing from the recommendation given by the “First National Judicial Commission”, which is otherwise called as ‘Shetty Commission’ and implementation of the same by the Government, based on the recommendation given...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 2014

Vasudevan Namboodiri Vs. A.M Parameswaran Namboodirippad

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-17-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALAAT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY,THE17H DAY OF JULY201426TH ASHADHA, 1936 CRP.No. 370 of 2014 () ----------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS8972013 of MUNSIFF COURT,CHAVAKKAD DATED2403-2014 REVISION PETITIONER(S)/ADDL.4TH DEFENDANT...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2004

Hindustan Construction Co. Limited Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, R ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-04-2004

Subject : ContractElectricity

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14(2) and 30; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11

Reported in : 2005(1)ARBLR41(Madras); 2004(4)CTC401; (2004)4MLJ260

Advocate for Respondent : N.C. Ramesh, Adv. For Respondent-1 in O.S.A. No. 201 of 1998 and ;K. Ramachandran, Senior Counsel for ;Anita Sumanth, Adv. for Respondent-2 in O.S.A. Nos. 107 and 108 of 1999

N. Kannadasan, J. 1. The appellant in OSA No. 201 of 1998 was awarded a contract by the first respondent and the contract agreement provides a period of 36 months to complete the work from the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 1997

Unit Trust of India Vs. G.V. Films Ltd. and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-25-1997

Subject : Banking

Acts : Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 2 and 19(4)

Reported in : 1997(2)CTC532

Advocate for Respondent : P.S. Raman, P.R. Raman and K.S. Viswanthan, Advs. for the Respondent No. 2 and ;K. Mani, Malika Srinivansan, S.V. Sudheer and Anita Ramachandran, Advs. for Respondent No. 1

ORDERJagadeesan, J.1. The applicant has filed this application to recall C.S. No. 253 of 1993 in T.A. No. 192 of 1997 which has been transferred to the Debts Recovery Tribunal at Chennai. The applicant is the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2003

Philips India Limited Vs. Ld. Fourth Industrial Tribunal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-26-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10 and 15(2)

Reported in : 2004(1)CHN97

Advocate for Respondent : Bikash Bhattacharyya, ;Bharati Mutsuddi and ;Jayanti Dharquarder, Advs. for the respondent No. 2

D.P. Kundu, J.1. In this writ proceeding the writ petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the Company) has challenged the Order No. 55 dated 25.3.2003 passed in Case No. VIII-215/99 by the Fourth Industrial Tribunal, West Bengal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 1994

P.K. Poulose Vs. the State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-28-1994

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 67(D); Constitution of India - Article 19(1)(9)

Reported in : AIR1995Ker234

Advocate for Respondent : V. Sankara Menon, Govt. Pleader

ORDERD.J. Jagannadha Raju, J. 1. In this batch of writ petitionsthe validity of the Government's notificationG.O.(P) No. 19/94/PW & T, Public Worksand Transport (M) Department dated 28-3-1994 issued as S.R.O. No. 364 of 1994, itchallenged. In...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 10 1976

The Management of Dhanalakshmi Mills Pvt. Ltd., Represented by Its Man ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-10-1976

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1976)2MLJ399

ORDERS. Mohan, J.1. This writ petition is to quash the order of the Labour Court passed in I.D. No. 139, of 1971, dated 3oth May, 1972. The short facts are as follows:In G.O. Rt. No. 2o3o,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial