Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr jaisinghani · Page 1 of about 33 results (0.091 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 23 1989

NaraIn Singh Yadav Vs. the Deputy Chief Controller of Imports and Expo ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-23-1989

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 20, 120-B, 201, 409, 420, 468, 471, 477 and 477-A; Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 5; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 342 and 406; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 1990(1)BomCR39; 1990CriLJ1652

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Jaisinghani

(1) All these petitions are disposed of by this common judgment.(2) It all began in 1973-74. The Government detected certain serious offences punishable under S. 120-B of the Indian Penal Code read with S. 5 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 1955

The State Vs. Andheri-marol-kurla Bus Service

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-04-1955

Subject : Labour and IndustrialCriminal

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10, 10(2), 10(3), 11, 11(1), 11(3), 11(4), 12, 12(4), 12(5), 12(6), 13, 13(5), 14, 15, 16, 17, 17A, 18, 19, 20, 20(1), 20(2), 22, 31, 31(1) and 33; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : AIR1955Bom324; (1955)57BOMLR529; 1955CriLJ1161; ILR1955Bom602; (1955)ILLJ378Bom

Advocate for Respondent : C.K. Jaisinghani, Adv.

Gajendragadkar, J. 1. This is an appeal against the order of acquittal passed by the learned Chief Presidency Magistrate, Bombay, in favour of the respondents.The respondents are the Andheri-Marol-Kurla Bus Service, its partners and the manager...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 1974

Miss Simi Garewal Vs. T.N. Ramchandran

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-28-1974

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1976)78BOMLR623

Kania, J.1. This is an appeal against the order of a learned Judge of the City Civil Court dated February 6, 1974 dismissing the Notice of Motion taken out by the appellant in Suit No. 694...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 20 1995

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. A.K. Menon, Custodian and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-20-1995

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 - Sections 2 and 11(2); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(43), 220, 220(2), 234 and 271; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 56; Provincial Insolvency Act, 1909

Reported in : 1996(5)BomCR564

S.N. Variava, J.1. This Court has been functioning since June 1992. Now so far as two Notified Parties are concerned, viz., the Harshad Mehta Group and Fairgrowth Financial Services Ltd., the time is approaching for distribution...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 2001

Credit Rating Information Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : May-03-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2003)84ITD247(Mum.)

1. The assessee is in appeal before us against the order of the learned CIT(A), dt. 17th July, 1998, for asst. yr. 1992-93. The assessee is aggrieved against considering fees amounting to Rs. 1,66,67,685 as having...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 1981

Kranti Mohan Guruprasad Mebra and anr. Vs. Fatehchand Vasuram Behal

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-27-1981

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9A

Reported in : AIR1982Bom263; (1981)83BOMLR445; 1983MhLJ141

Advocate for Respondent : C.K. Jalsinghant, Adv.

1. For some reason of the other, the partners of a partnership firm had fallen out, and it is on account of the subsequent events that this proceeding has come into existence. The plaintiff who is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 1977

Kunjilal Hanumanlala Jaiswal Vs. B.C. Deo

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-15-1977

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : (1978)80BOMLR599; 1978MhLJ462

Deshmukh, J.1. These petitions arise out of proceedings under Section 47 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 before the State Transport Authority, Bombay, and also the appellate proceedings before the Appellate Tribunal. Since both the applications...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 1992

P.R. Nerurkar Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-30-1992

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Mathadi Hamal and other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 - Sections 2(4), 3(3) and 4(3); Cloth Markets or Shops Unprotected Workers, (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Scheme, 1971

Reported in : 1992(3)BomCR439

Advocate for Respondent : K.D. Ranadive, A.P.P. for respondent No. 1 in C.A. No. 751 of 1982, ; K.D. Shah and ; U.K. Shah, Advs., for respondent Nos. 2 to 4 in C.A. No. 751 of 1982, ; C.K. Tuli, Adv., for respondent Nos. 2 to

M.G. Chaudhari, J.1. As both the appeals involve common questions they can be conveniently disposed of by this judgment.Facts of Appeal No. 751 of 19822. Upon a complaint instituted by the appellant Mr. P.R. Nerurkar, an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2002

Jayesh H. Pandya Vs. Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-08-2002

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 48; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 40, Rule 1

Reported in : 2002(4)ALLMR316

Advocate for Respondent : Shekhar Naphade, Adv., i/b., ;M.K. Nesari, Adv. for defendant No. 1, ;V. Pandey, Adv., i/b., ;K. Shetty, Adv. for defendant No. 2 and ;P. Kowli, Adv., i/b., ;Aziz Patel, Adv. for defendant No. 4

D.G. Karnik, J. 1. This Chamber Summons has been taken out at the instance of the defendant No. 1 in Civil Suit No. 2812 of 2001. The parties are hereinafter referred to by their status in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 1993

Smt. Shobha Prakash Lala Vs. Nandlal Hotchand Bhatija and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-09-1993

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 263, 268 and 295; Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules - Rules 399 to 403; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13

Reported in : 1994(4)BomCR21; (1994)96BOMLR253

Advocate for Respondent : V.K. Merchant Adv., i/b., Kishore Thakordas and Co.

M.S. Rane, J.1. This petition has been presented by the Caveator in Testamentary Petition No. 32 of 1992 inter alia claiming reliefs to the effect that the grant issued in the Testamentary Petition No. 32 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial