Advanced Search Results
NaraIn Singh Yadav Vs. the Deputy Chief Controller of Imports and Expo ...
Mumbai
Nov-23-1989
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 20, 120-B, 201, 409, 420, 468, 471, 477 and 477-A; Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 5; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 342 and 406; Constitution of India - Article 21
1990(1)BomCR39; 1990CriLJ1652
Mr. Jaisinghani
(1) All these petitions are disposed of by this common judgment.(2) It all began in 1973-74. The Government detected certain serious offences punishable under S. 120-B of the Indian Penal Code read with S. 5 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State Vs. Andheri-marol-kurla Bus Service
Mumbai
Feb-04-1955
Labour and IndustrialCriminal
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10, 10(2), 10(3), 11, 11(1), 11(3), 11(4), 12, 12(4), 12(5), 12(6), 13, 13(5), 14, 15, 16, 17, 17A, 18, 19, 20, 20(1), 20(2), 22, 31, 31(1) and 33; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908
AIR1955Bom324; (1955)57BOMLR529; 1955CriLJ1161; ILR1955Bom602; (1955)ILLJ378Bom
C.K. Jaisinghani, Adv.
Gajendragadkar, J. 1. This is an appeal against the order of acquittal passed by the learned Chief Presidency Magistrate, Bombay, in favour of the respondents.The respondents are the Andheri-Marol-Kurla Bus Service, its partners and the manager...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMiss Simi Garewal Vs. T.N. Ramchandran
Mumbai
Feb-28-1974
Civil
(1976)78BOMLR623
Kania, J.1. This is an appeal against the order of a learned Judge of the City Civil Court dated February 6, 1974 dismissing the Notice of Motion taken out by the appellant in Suit No. 694...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. A.K. Menon, Custodian and ors ...
Mumbai
Feb-20-1995
Direct Taxation
Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 - Sections 2 and 11(2); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(43), 220, 220(2), 234 and 271; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 56; Provincial Insolvency Act, 1909
1996(5)BomCR564
S.N. Variava, J.1. This Court has been functioning since June 1992. Now so far as two Notified Parties are concerned, viz., the Harshad Mehta Group and Fairgrowth Financial Services Ltd., the time is approaching for distribution...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCredit Rating Information Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
May-03-2001
Direct Taxation
(2003)84ITD247(Mum.)
1. The assessee is in appeal before us against the order of the learned CIT(A), dt. 17th July, 1998, for asst. yr. 1992-93. The assessee is aggrieved against considering fees amounting to Rs. 1,66,67,685 as having...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKranti Mohan Guruprasad Mebra and anr. Vs. Fatehchand Vasuram Behal
Mumbai
Mar-27-1981
Commercial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9A
AIR1982Bom263; (1981)83BOMLR445; 1983MhLJ141
C.K. Jalsinghant, Adv.
1. For some reason of the other, the partners of a partnership firm had fallen out, and it is on account of the subsequent events that this proceeding has come into existence. The plaintiff who is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKunjilal Hanumanlala Jaiswal Vs. B.C. Deo
Mumbai
Jul-15-1977
Motor Vehicles
(1978)80BOMLR599; 1978MhLJ462
Deshmukh, J.1. These petitions arise out of proceedings under Section 47 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 before the State Transport Authority, Bombay, and also the appellate proceedings before the Appellate Tribunal. Since both the applications...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.R. Nerurkar Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Jul-30-1992
Criminal
Maharashtra Mathadi Hamal and other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 - Sections 2(4), 3(3) and 4(3); Cloth Markets or Shops Unprotected Workers, (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Scheme, 1971
1992(3)BomCR439
K.D. Ranadive, A.P.P. for respondent No. 1 in C.A. No. 751 of 1982, ; K.D. Shah and ; U.K. Shah, Advs., for respondent Nos. 2 to 4 in C.A. No. 751 of 1982, ; C.K. Tuli, Adv., for respondent Nos. 2 to
M.G. Chaudhari, J.1. As both the appeals involve common questions they can be conveniently disposed of by this judgment.Facts of Appeal No. 751 of 19822. Upon a complaint instituted by the appellant Mr. P.R. Nerurkar, an...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJayesh H. Pandya Vs. Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd.
Mumbai
Jul-08-2002
Commercial
Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 48; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 40, Rule 1
2002(4)ALLMR316
Shekhar Naphade, Adv., i/b., ;M.K. Nesari, Adv. for defendant No. 1, ;V. Pandey, Adv., i/b., ;K. Shetty, Adv. for defendant No. 2 and ;P. Kowli, Adv., i/b., ;Aziz Patel, Adv. for defendant No. 4
D.G. Karnik, J. 1. This Chamber Summons has been taken out at the instance of the defendant No. 1 in Civil Suit No. 2812 of 2001. The parties are hereinafter referred to by their status in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Shobha Prakash Lala Vs. Nandlal Hotchand Bhatija and ors.
Mumbai
Dec-09-1993
CivilFamily
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 263, 268 and 295; Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules - Rules 399 to 403; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13
1994(4)BomCR21; (1994)96BOMLR253
V.K. Merchant Adv., i/b., Kishore Thakordas and Co.
M.S. Rane, J.1. This petition has been presented by the Caveator in Testamentary Petition No. 32 of 1992 inter alia claiming reliefs to the effect that the grant issued in the Testamentary Petition No. 32 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »