Advanced Search Results

H. Amalraj Vs. Regina

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1998(2)CTC502

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. J. Radhakrishnan, Adv.

ORDER1. The revision petitioner is the defendant in the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff in O.S.No.973 of 1995 for a money decree on the basis of pro-note dated 29.1.1994, said to have been executed by the...

S. Veerakumar Vs. State Bank of India by Its Chairman,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act; Pension Rules - Rule 8; State Bank of India Employees' Pension Fund Rules - Rules 2(2), 7, 8, 20 and 22; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules - Rule 19; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules - Rule 49; Border Security Border Rules - Rule 19; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : (2004)ILLJ138Mad

Advocate for Respondent : S. Kanniah, Adv.

ORDERE. Padmanabhan, J. 1. The petitioner has prayed for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the respondents relating to the payment of pension to the petitioner and quash the...

Fidelity Finance Ltd., Chennai Rep. by Its Law Officer Vs. Banking Omb ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : BankingConstitutionCommercial

Acts : The Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Companies Act

Reported in : [2004]55SCL73(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : J. Radhakrishnan, Adv.

ORDERE. Padmanabhan, J.1. The petitioner a company, registered under the Indian Companies Act, carrying on non banking finance activities engaged in hire purchase, lease, bill discounting and other financial service activities seek for the issue of...

State Bank of Hyderabad, Industrial Finance Branch Vs. S.P. Savithri,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Banking

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2005Mad275; [2006]130CompCas191(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : V.J. Radhakrishnan, Adv. for R1 in WP 31232/2004 and ;N.S. Nandakumar, Adv. for R1 in WA 1307

ORDERD. Murugesan, J.1. As the issues involved in the Writ Appeal and the Writ Petitions are one and the same, they are taken up together for disposal by this Common Order.2. For the disposal of both...

P.Arumugam Vs. the Chief General Manager State Bank of Mysore and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.J.Radhakrishnan; Mr.T.Venugopalan, Advs.

1. The writ petition is directed against the order of the first respondent dated 22.10.2007, confirming the order of compulsory retirement passed against the petitioner by the second respondent dated 17.7.2007.2.1. The petitioner was serving as...