Advanced Search Results

State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Mohan Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 129

Reported in : 1995Supp(2)SCC153

A.M. Ahmadi and; S.P. Bharucha, JJ.1. The High Court order became final after this Court disposed of the appeal by a speaking order on 14-8-1989. Thereafter, because the State Government went on seeking time for complying...

Thakur Das and ors. Vs. Om Prakash

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1985WLN(UC)303

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. D.S. Shishodia

Panna Chand Jain, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and award passed by the Accident Claims Tribunal, Udaipur dated 6th August, 1982, in claims case No. 108/81, by which a claim petition of the...

M.L.C. Gupta Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1936All314; 162Ind.Cas.507

Sulaiman, C.J.1. This is an application by the author of a book called 'Jat Jati ke Mukammal Halat yani Jat Darpan, Part I,' under Section 99-B, Criminal Procedure Code, for an order to set aside the...

Thyssen Stahlunion Gmbh Vs. the Steel Authority of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contract

Acts : Arbitration Act - Sections 30; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73

Reported in : 2002IIAD(Delhi)149; AIR2002Delhi255; 2002(1)ARBLR610(Delhi); 96(2002)DLT515

Advocate for Respondent : Dipankar P. Gupta, Sr. Adv., ; Jaideep and ; Siddharth Yada

J.D. Kapoor, J.1. This is an International Award. It was made and published on 24th September, 1997. By virtue of the award, the plaintiffs Thyssen Stahlunion GmbH (in short 'ISU') are entitled to the following sums:-...

Rai Sahib Dr. Gurdittamal Kapur Vs. Mahant Amar Das Chela Mahant Ram S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 92; Punjab Tenancy Act - Sections 38 and 39

Reported in : [1965]3SCR433

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Gupta

Mudholkar, J. 1. The short point which falls to be considered in this appeal by special leave from a judgment of the High Court of Punjab dismissing the appellant's appeal in limine is whether the suit...

Bansilal Farms Vs. Umarani Bose and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953; West Bengal Land Reforms Act - Sections 2(7), 3(1), 3A and 14; West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 1996(8)SCALE513; (1997)9SCC191; [1996]Supp9SCR131

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Gupta

G.B. Pattanaik, J.1. Leave granted.2. These three appeals by special leave are directed against one and same judgment dated 25.09.1992 of the Division Bench of Calcutta High Court. The three appellants are the State of West...

Margaret George Chandamamnil Vs. Chandamannil Mananman George

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 22

Reported in : AIR1976Delhi190; 12(1976)DLT116; 1976RLR504

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Gupta

B.C. Misra, J.(1) This first appeal has been filed by the wife against the order of the Additional District Judge, dated 5th January, 1973, by which he dismissed the petition of the wife for grant of...

Sh. Ajay Kumar Vs. Indian Railway Construction Co. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1994)IILLJ182Del

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Gupta

ORDERY. K. Sabharwal, J. 1. The facts leading to the dismissal of the petitioner from service as pleaded in the petition, in brief are :- The petitioner was appointed in the respondent company as Junior Engineer...

Cit Vs. A. R. J. Security Printers

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]131TAXMAN297(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Gupta

D.K. Jain, J.These three appeals, by the revenue, under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') are directed against the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New...

James Hotels Ltd. Vs. Union Territory and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Property

Reported in : (2009)154PLR454

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Anupam Gupta, Mr. Gupta

M.M. Kumar, J.1. After availing statutory remedies of appeal and revision and various rounds of litigation before the statutory departmental authorities, the petitioner Company has filed the instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging...