Advanced Search Results

Ramrao Ramchandra Datir Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Reported in : [2005(104)FLR656]; (2005)IILLJ607Bom; 2005(1)MhLj115

Advocate for Respondent : D.B. Patel, AGP

D.D. Sinha, J.1. Heard Shri Manohar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Patel, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present writ petition is directed against...

Sneha Mandal Co-operative Housing Society Limited and Others Vs. the U ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Environment

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3(1), 4, 5 and 19; Environmental Control Rules, 1986 - Rule 5(3); Constitution of India - Article 226; Air Craft Rules, 1937 - Rules 3(2), 11, 79, 86 and 134; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 44; Air Craft Act, 1934 - Sections 2(2); International Airport Authority Act, 1971

Reported in : AIR2000Bom121; 2000(1)ALLMR659; 2000(1)BomCR395; (2000)1BOMLR13

Advocate for Respondent : S.G. Page, ;D.T. Palekar, ;R.V. Govilkar, A.G.P., ;R.M. Sawant, ;D.Y. Chandrachud, Addl. Solicitor General, ;M.B. Rao, ;I.M. Chagla, ;D.J. Khambatta and ;H.N. Vakil i/b ;M/s. Mulla & ;Mulla and ;C

ORDERPer S.H. Kapadia, J.1. By this Public Interest Writ Petition, the petitioners pray that the constructions and the development activities carried out or proposed to be carried out on Plot Nos. 146, 147 and 148 of...

Ali Jawad Ameerhasan Rizvi and ors. Vs. Indo French Biotech Enterprise ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397 and 398; Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992

Reported in : [1999]95CompCas373(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Sunita Poddar and ;M.L. Bansal, Advs. for respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 8, ;Sunita Poddar, Adv. for respondent Nos. 2 and 15, ;Kumar Desai and ;R.N. Shetty, Advs. for respondent No. 10 , ;Rahul Chitnis, Ad

M.B. Shah, C.J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Unfortunately, it appears that there is no legislation which can effectively control the mushrooming of companies which tempt small investors to deposit or invest their life-savings in...

Deepesh Pakhru Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2001(4)ALLMR640; 2001(4)BomCR637; (2001)4BOMLR500; 2001(4)MhLj636

Advocate for Respondent : A. Kalyanram, ;Gitanjali Prabhu and ;Milind More, A.G.P. and ;R.M. Sawant, G.P.

H.L. Gokhale, J. 1. All these petitioners are graduate students, who have applied for the admission to M.B.A./M.M.S. course for which Common Entrance Test was conducted in the month of May, 2001. The interviews for the...

Harishchandra Narayan Maurya Vs. Rajendraprasad Dargahi Varma

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 94 and 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 59

Reported in : 1997(1)BomCR28

Advocate for Respondent : R.V. Govilkar, Adv.

R.M. Lodha, J.1. Original plaintiff Harishchandra Narayan Maurya is the appellant in this appeal and is aggrieved by the order dated 19-10-1993 passed by the City Civil Court, Bombay dismissing two notices of Motion viz. Notice...

State of Maharashtra Vs. Espee Engineers and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Employee's Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 14

Reported in : 1991(4)BomCR449

Advocate for Respondent : V.D. Govilkar, Adv.

M.F. Saldanha, J.1. This is an appeal preferred by the State of Maharashtra and is directed against an order passed by the learned Vth Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Thane, in a prosecution at the instance of...

Bombay Environmental Action Group, a Society Registered Under the Soci ... Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2, 2(7), 2(9A), 2(12), 22, 22A, 29, 31, 31(5), 33, 37, 37(1), 37(1A), 37(1AA), 37(2), 38, 50, 58(1), 125, 126, 126(1), 127, 128 and 149; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1915 - Sections 3; Bombay Town Planning (Amendment) Act, 1954 - Sections 7; Bombay Town Planning (Amendment) Act, 1955; Mysore Town and Country Planning Act, 1961; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Article 48A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 31, 47, 48A, 51A, 141, 142, 226 and 368; Conciliation and Arbitration Act, 1904-1952;Greater Bombay Development Control Regulations, 1991 - Regulations 1, 52, 52(4), 53(1), 56, 57, 58, 58(1), 58(2), 58(3), 58(4), 58(5), 58(6), 58(7), 58(8), 59(9) and 62(3); Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearan

Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR574; (2005)107BOMLR337; (2006)4CompLJ117(Bom)

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. The above Petition has been filed in larger public interest, to protect the interests of residents of Mumbai and to improve the quality of life in Mumbai, which has drastically deteriorated during the...

Saroj Kiran Ahire Vs. Sunil Eknath Pawar and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

P.C. 1. This is an application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. filed by the aforesaid applicant challenging the order dated 28.4.2000 in Criminal Case No.211/S/2000 whereby the learned Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 9th Court, Bandra, Mumbai...

Hakikullah Haji Rahimutullah and Others Vs. the Maharashtra Housing an ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil Property

Acts : Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 - Sections 66 and 69; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 20, Rules 3 and 8 - Order 23, Rule 1; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11(3); Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953

Reported in : AIR1997Bom239; 1997(4)BomCR208; 1997(1)MhLj756

Advocate for Respondent : R.V. Govilkar, Adv.

ORDER1. The fact rise to this petition are rather peculiar. The petitioners are the owner of certain structures standing on survey No. 93 (part) situate at Govandi, Mumbai. The petitioners were served with notices dated 1st...

Smt. Madhurika C. Merchant Vs. K.S. Dilipsinghji and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : (1984)86BOMLR421

Shah, J.1. This is a petition for the Writ of Habeas Corpus under Art. 226 of the Constitution filed by Mrs. Madhurika Chandrakant Merchant challenging the detention of her husband Chandrakant Purshottamdas Merchant under S. 3(1)...