Advanced Search Results

Narendra Engineering Works Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4

Reported in : 1981(8)ELT859(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Govilkar

Bharucha, J.1. The petitioners manufacture at Kolhapur connecting rods for diesel engines and tractors. They also engage in job work by processing forgings supplied to them into connecting rods, of sizes required by the suppliers, recovering...

Arjandas Teckchand Kashyap and Others Vs. Smt. Pooja Jaiprakash Pamnan ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Govilkar

Oral Judgment: By this application filed under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short “Arbitration Act”) the applicant seeks appointment of an arbitrator. 2. Some of the facts relevant for the purpose...

Jethmal Kapurchand Kothari Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3, 3(1), 8 and 9

Reported in : (1985)87BOMLR525

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Govilkar

Shah, J.1. This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under Art. 226 of the Constitution challenging the validity of the detention of Kishormal Jethmal Kothari under an order of detention dt. July 16,...

Smt. Mannabi Shamsi Vs. B.B. Gujral

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1979)81BOMLR476

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Govilkar

Naik, J.1. By this petition the petitioner who is the wife of one Qutubuddin, challenges the order of detention of her husband under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities...

Ramrao Ramchandra Datir Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Reported in : [2005(104)FLR656]; (2005)IILLJ607Bom; 2005(1)MhLj115

Advocate for Respondent : D.B. Patel, AGP

D.D. Sinha, J.1. Heard Shri Manohar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Patel, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present writ petition is directed against...

Ali Jawad Ameerhasan Rizvi and ors. Vs. Indo French Biotech Enterprise ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397 and 398; Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992

Reported in : [1999]95CompCas373(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Sunita Poddar and ;M.L. Bansal, Advs. for respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 8, ;Sunita Poddar, Adv. for respondent Nos. 2 and 15, ;Kumar Desai and ;R.N. Shetty, Advs. for respondent No. 10 , ;Rahul Chitnis, Ad

M.B. Shah, C.J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Unfortunately, it appears that there is no legislation which can effectively control the mushrooming of companies which tempt small investors to deposit or invest their life-savings in...

Sneha Mandal Co-operative Housing Society Limited and Others Vs. the U ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Environment

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3(1), 4, 5 and 19; Environmental Control Rules, 1986 - Rule 5(3); Constitution of India - Article 226; Air Craft Rules, 1937 - Rules 3(2), 11, 79, 86 and 134; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 44; Air Craft Act, 1934 - Sections 2(2); International Airport Authority Act, 1971

Reported in : AIR2000Bom121; 2000(1)ALLMR659; 2000(1)BomCR395; (2000)1BOMLR13

Advocate for Respondent : S.G. Page, ;D.T. Palekar, ;R.V. Govilkar, A.G.P., ;R.M. Sawant, ;D.Y. Chandrachud, Addl. Solicitor General, ;M.B. Rao, ;I.M. Chagla, ;D.J. Khambatta and ;H.N. Vakil i/b ;M/s. Mulla & ;Mulla and ;C

ORDERPer S.H. Kapadia, J.1. By this Public Interest Writ Petition, the petitioners pray that the constructions and the development activities carried out or proposed to be carried out on Plot Nos. 146, 147 and 148 of...

Deepesh Pakhru Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2001(4)ALLMR640; 2001(4)BomCR637; (2001)4BOMLR500; 2001(4)MhLj636

Advocate for Respondent : A. Kalyanram, ;Gitanjali Prabhu and ;Milind More, A.G.P. and ;R.M. Sawant, G.P.

H.L. Gokhale, J. 1. All these petitioners are graduate students, who have applied for the admission to M.B.A./M.M.S. course for which Common Entrance Test was conducted in the month of May, 2001. The interviews for the...

Taha Abdul Razak Hamadi of Kurbala Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1) and 3(2)

Reported in : 1985(1)BomCR531; (1984)86BOMLR520

Advocate for Respondent : M.R. Kotwal, P.P. for respondent Nos. 1 and 3 and ;V.D. Govilkar, Adv. for respondent No. 2

M.M. Qazi, J.1. By this petition, the petitioner-detenu has challenged the order of detention dated January 4, 1984 passed by the Assistant Secretary to the Government of Maharashtra, Home Department (Special), detaining the petitioner-detenu under sub-section...

Harishchandra Narayan Maurya Vs. Rajendraprasad Dargahi Varma

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 94 and 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 59

Reported in : 1997(1)BomCR28

Advocate for Respondent : R.V. Govilkar, Adv.

R.M. Lodha, J.1. Original plaintiff Harishchandra Narayan Maurya is the appellant in this appeal and is aggrieved by the order dated 19-10-1993 passed by the City Civil Court, Bombay dismissing two notices of Motion viz. Notice...