Advanced Search Results
N. Chandra Babu Vs. the Garrison Engineer (Air Force), Military Engine ...
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Jun-22-2009
Land Acquisition
By Hon'ble Mr. George Paracken, Judicial Member In this OA applicant has sought a declaration that he is senior to the 5th respondent in the cadre of Pipe Fitter in the Area Seniority Unit of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV. Ramachandran Nair Retired Senior Loco Inspector Southern Railway, T ...
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Mar-23-2009
MRTP
Hon'ble Mr. George Paracken, Judicial Member The applicant while working as a Senior Loco Inspector in Southern Railway retired voluntarily with effect from 30.11.2004. As a running staff, he was granted 30 % of his basic...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.H.Joy, Kottayam Vs. the Principal General Manager, Telecom,bsnl Bhav ...
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Nov-25-2009
Miscellaneous
HON'BLE MR. GEORGE PARACKEN, JUDICIAL MEMBER Before he joined service as Senior Superintendent in the office of the Regional Joint Labour Commissioner, Kozhikode on 3.6.1986, the Applicant had put in 7 years of service as Technician...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
P.V. Babu, S/O. P.K. Vasu, Assistant Operator, National Institute of F ...
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Nov-19-2009
Land Acquisition
By Hon'ble Mr. George Paracken, Judicial Member - According to the applicant he is the senior most among the Assistant Operators in the scale of pay of Rs. 4000-6000/- (pre-revised). He is aggrieved by the Annexure...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshok Kumar Vs. Additional Dy. Commissioner of
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Dec-20-2002
Land Acquisition
(2004)(1)SLJ181CAT
Mr. George Paracken, Mr. J.A. Chaudhary
1. The present O.A. was earlier disposed of vide Tribunal's order dated 2.5.2000. Thereafter the applicant had filed writ petition No.4246/2000 before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi which was disposed of vide Hon'ble High Court's...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJoint Commissioner of Police and ors. Vs. Sube Singh and ors.
Delhi
Apr-30-2002
Service
Delhi Police Act, 1978 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 17(1), 18, 21 and 23; All India Services Act, 1951 - Sections 3(1); Indian Police Service (Fixation of Cadre Strength) Regulations, 1955; Delhi Police (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1980 - Rules 3, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 6 and 23(6); Customs Act, 1962; Central Excise Rules; Constitution of India - Article 311; Delhi Police (Appointment and Recruitment) Rules, 1980 - Rule 3(1); General Clauses Act - Sections 17, 18 and 19
2002VIIAD(Delhi)539; 99(2002)DLT37
Arun Bhardwaj, ; Pradeep Dahiya, ; V.P. Sharma, ;
S.B. Sinha, C.J. 1. Whether Joint Commissioner of Police can be a disciplinary authority of the respondents of the writ petitions, is the question involved in this batch of writ petitions which arise out of judgment...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Vs. Union of India (Uo ...
Delhi
Aug-05-2005
Civil
Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867 - Sections 5, 5(2), 5(8), 6, 7, 8A, 8B, 8C and 8C(2); Press Council Act, 1978 - Sections 4; Constitution of India - Article 19(1)
122(2005)DLT601; 2005(83)DRJ241; 2005(31)PTC190(Del)
Rajiv Shakdhar and ; T.P. Hassi Prasad, Advs. for respondents 1, 2 and 4, ;
Mukul Mudgal, J.1. This writ petition seeks a writ of mandamus against the respondents namely Union of India (Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs & the Secretary Ministry of Information & Broadcasting), the DCP, Press Section-Licensing, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGovt. of Nct of Delhi and ors. Vs. Rajbir Singh
Delhi
Aug-28-2002
Service
Delhi Police (Promotion and Confirmation) Rules, 1980 - Rules 17 and 19; Punjab Police Rules, 1934 - Rules 13.1 and 13.8(2); Administrative Tribunals Act
2003(3)SLJ436(Delhi)
Shyam Babu, Adv.
S.B. Sinha, C.J.1. Interpretation of Rule 19 (ii) of Delhi Police (Promotion & Confirmation) Rules, 1980 (hereinafter for the sake of brevity referred to as, 'the said Act') is in question in this writ petition, which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG. Pavithran, S/O. Govindan, Retired Sr. Supdt., Palayamkunnu Vs. Smt. ...
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Dec-17-2009
Land Acquisition
By Hon'ble Mr. George Paracken, Judicial Member - Heard the learnerd counsel for the parties. 2. This Contempt Petition has been filed for the alleged non- implementation of the order of this Tribunal dated 6th September,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.V. Pushkaran, S/O. Velayudhan, Engine Driver Class I, Ernakulam Dist ...
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Dec-17-2009
Land Acquisition
By Hon'ble Mr. George Paracken, Judicial Member - Heard the learned counsel for the respondent. 2. This Contempt Petition has been filed for the alleged non- implementation of the order dated 3rd November, 2008 in OA...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »