Advanced Search Results

Amit and Others Vs. Krishna Raosaheb Pawar and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Gaware

1. This petition is by defendants, questioning an order passed under the provisions of Order 8 Rule 6A and 6C of the Code of Civil Procedure, whereby the counter claim filed by the defendants in Regular...

Baburao @ Babulal Raibhan Patole Vs.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307

Advocate for Respondent : Mrs. U. V. Kejariwal, Adv.

1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents State. 2. Criminal Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 14th August 2003 passed by the Additional...

Raghunath Ramnath Zolekar and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Criminal

Oral Judgment: (A.H. Joshi, J.) 5th November, 2012. 1. We have heard all these appeals at length. Perused the record. All appeals are being decided by this common judgment. 2. First Information Report was registered, taking...

Suresh @ Surendra, vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO.120 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)) C/W CRIMINAL PETITION NO.14131 OF 2024 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)) IN...

Prakash and Others versus the State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.1160

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 1160 : 2024 INSC 1020 Prakash and Others v. The State of Maharashtra and Another (Criminal Appeal No. 5543 of 2024) 20 December 2024 [B.R. Gavai* and K.V. Viswanathan, JJ.] Issue for Consideration...

Chandrashekhar S/O Rohidas Dusane and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra an ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Sections 19, 454, 456 and 456A; Bombay Provincial Corporations (Election to the office of Mayor and Deputy Mayor) Rules, 2005 - Rules 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 5(3), 7(10) and 32; Bombay General Clauses Act - Sections 21; Uttar Pardesh Rules - Rules 4 and 6; Representation of People Act - Sections 30

Reported in : 2007(1)ALLMR856; 2007(1)BomCR164; 2006(6)MhLj820

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Kadam, A.G.P., ; S.T. Shelke,; P.R. Katneshwarkar,; V.D. Hon,; V.P. Latange,; A.D. Pawar, Advs.; P.M. Shah, Sr. Counsel,; A.S. Sawant, Adv., ; Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Counsel and; R.S. Deshmukh, Adv

P.V. Hardas, J.1. Since the facts in both the petitions are identical, both these petitions are decided by this common judgment. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, these...

Mohan S/O Shamrao Mohite Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through Muktaina ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 8, 20, 50, 52(3) and 57

Reported in : 2008BomCR(Cri)781

Advocate for Respondent : D.R. Adhav, A.P.P.

V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. This appeal arises out of Judgment rendered by Special Judge, Jalgaon, in Special Case No. 5 of 2005. By the impugned Judgment, appellant - Mohan has been convicted for offence punishable under Section...

Smita Suryakant Ashtekar @ Smita Deepak Kumbhare Vs. the State of Maha ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: (K.U. Chandiwal, J.) 1. Heard. Considering the nature of controversy raised by the petitioner, particularly challenge to the order of externment, we do not propose to permit intervention of applicant Narwade or getting him...

Kusum Dashrath Kharmare Vs. Popat Madhav Gangarde and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Transfer of Properties Act - Sections 52; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(2), 54, 151 and 152 - Order 20, Rule 12 - Order 47, Rule 1; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 85; Hindu Law; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2008(1)ALLMR576; 2008(1)BomCR397; 2008(1)MhLj267

Advocate for Respondent : N.V. Gaware, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and ;S.V. Adwant, Adv. for Respondent No. 6

ORDERS.B. Deshmukh, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and taken up for final hearing, with the consent of the parties.This petition takes an exception to the judgment and order dated 30th...

Sambhaji Shripati Bankar (Since Deceased by L.Rs. Babai Sambhaji Banka ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Ceiling on Holdings Act, 1961; ;Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 5, 29, 31, 32(1), 32A, 32F, 32G, 32G(3), 32M, 32K(3), 32P, 43­1B, 63, 73, 73A and 84C; ;Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Section 98; ;Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 - Section 32(1); ;Mamlatdar's Courts Act, 1906 - Section 21

Advocate for Respondent : N.V. Gaware, Adv. for respondent No. 1

V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. By this petition, the petitioners impugn judgement and order rendered by learned Member of Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, in Revision Application No. 4/1989, confirming the judgement and order rendered by SubDivisional Officer, Ahmednagar in...