Advanced Search Results

State Vs. Narsing Lingo Deshpande

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Food adulteration

Reported in : (1957)59BOMLR141

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ganatra

Vyas, J.1. This is an appeal from a judgment of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Belgaum City, acquitting the respondent who was charged with having committed offences under Clauses (a) and (b) of Sub-section (1) of...

Sarfarzali Nawabali Mirza Vs. Miss Maneck G. Burjorji Reporter

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1976)78BOMLR704; 1976MhLJ576

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ganatra

Apte, J.1. This revision petition by the original defendant is directed against the findings recorded by the Judge of the City Civil Court, Bombay, in Short Cause Suit No. 3413 of 1.973 on two preliminary issues....

Ratansi Hirji JaIn Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act - Sections 7, 16(1); Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules - Rule A-25.02

Reported in : 1982(2)BomCR590

ORDER1. The petitioner, hereinafter referred to as 'the accused', was prosecuted in Criminal Case No. 169 of 1978 in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kulaba at Alibag for an offence punishable under S....

Lalji Mulji Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Reported in : (1965)67BOMLR484

Naik, J.1. The appellant, who would hereafter be called the accused, was convicted under Section 471 read with Section 394(1)(a)(ii) of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 201, in...

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Shri R.A. Chandawarkar and Other

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Drug and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 16, 18, 20, 21(1 and 2), 23, 27 and 34; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 244, 245, 246, 247 and 401; Drugs and Cosmetic Rules, 1945 - Rules 46 and 47; Bombay Prevention of Adulteration Act, 1925 - Sections 14 and 16

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR519; 1999BomCR(Cri)519; (1999)3BOMLR394; 1999CriLJ4449; 1999(2)MhLj650

Advocate for Respondent : V.B. Ganatra, Adv.

ORDERS. Radhakrishnan, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel; Mr. D.S. Mhaispurkar, the learned A.P.P. for the V.B. Ganatra, the learned Counsel for the respondents.2. This is a Criminal Revision Application filed by the State of Maharashtra against...

Mangaldas Raghavji Ruparel and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Criminal Law; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 182, 510 and 537; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 272 and 276; The Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 4(1), 7, 10, 10(3), 11, 13(1), 13(5), 16(1), 17(1) and 19(1); Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 12, 13, 24, 65, 66 and 83(1); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 8(1), 23(1), 23(1-A) and 24(1); Madras Prevention of Adulteration Act, 1918

Reported in : AIR1966SC128; 1966CriLJ106; [1965]2SCR894

Mudholkar, J.1. This appeal and Criminal appeal No. 113/63 arise out of a joint trial of the appellant Mangaldas and the two appellants Daryanomal and Kodumal in Crl. A. 113 of 1963 for the contravention of...

Gahininath Bhimrao Patekar Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 7, 12, 14, 14A, 16, 20 and 30(1)

Reported in : 1987(2)BomCR524; 1987MhLJ153

ORDER1. The applicant-accused is the proprietor of M/s. Ganesh Dairy, 616, South Kasba, Solapur. The complainant-Food Inspector took a sample of buffalo milk from him on 17th May, 1981 at about 9.00 a.m. The said sample...

Dinkar Keshav Bedbkar Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ConstitutionService

Reported in : (1969)71BOMLR867; 1970MhLJ364

Chandrachud J.1. The appellant brought a suit for a declaration that the order dated January 30, 1964, issued by respondent No. 2(ii), the Secretary, State Board of Literature & Culture, terminating his services in the Vishwakosha...

Collector of Sales Tax, Bombay State Vs. Parimal Brothers

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 - Sections 14(3), 14(4) and 16(6); Indian Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 230 and 230(1)

Reported in : (1962)64BOMLR705; 1963MhLJ65; [1962]13STC647(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : V.B. Ganatra and ;Dhanuka, Advs.

Tambe, J.1. These 8 references can be disposed of by one judgment. The dealer who has been assessed to sales tax under the Sales Tax Act, 1953 (hereafter referred to as the Act) is the same...

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Jagdish B. Shah

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1992(1)BomCR405; 1992CriLJ2394

Advocate for Respondent : V.B. Ganatra and ;C.S. Gosalia, Advs.

1. An issue of considerable importance has been canvassed on behalf of the original accused in this and the companion appeal which I am summarizing below. (1) Whether in a criminal trial, the consequences of which...