Advanced Search Results
Ratansi Hirji JaIn Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Aug-31-1982
CriminalFood Adulteration
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act - Sections 7, 16(1); Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules - Rule A-25.02
1982(2)BomCR590
ORDER1. The petitioner, hereinafter referred to as 'the accused', was prosecuted in Criminal Case No. 169 of 1978 in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kulaba at Alibag for an offence punishable under S....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLalji Mulji Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jan-21-1965
CriminalConstitution
(1965)67BOMLR484
Naik, J.1. The appellant, who would hereafter be called the accused, was convicted under Section 471 read with Section 394(1)(a)(ii) of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 201, in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Maharashtra Vs. Shri R.A. Chandawarkar and Other
Mumbai
Feb-18-1998
Criminal
Drug and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 16, 18, 20, 21(1 and 2), 23, 27 and 34; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 244, 245, 246, 247 and 401; Drugs and Cosmetic Rules, 1945 - Rules 46 and 47; Bombay Prevention of Adulteration Act, 1925 - Sections 14 and 16
1999(5)BomCR519; 1999BomCR(Cri)519; (1999)3BOMLR394; 1999CriLJ4449; 1999(2)MhLj650
V.B. Ganatra, Adv.
ORDERS. Radhakrishnan, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel; Mr. D.S. Mhaispurkar, the learned A.P.P. for the V.B. Ganatra, the learned Counsel for the respondents.2. This is a Criminal Revision Application filed by the State of Maharashtra against...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mangaldas Raghavji Ruparel and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and a ...
Supreme Court of India
Feb-08-1965
CriminalFood Adulteration
Criminal Law; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 182, 510 and 537; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 272 and 276; The Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 4(1), 7, 10, 10(3), 11, 13(1), 13(5), 16(1), 17(1) and 19(1); Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 12, 13, 24, 65, 66 and 83(1); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 8(1), 23(1), 23(1-A) and 24(1); Madras Prevention of Adulteration Act, 1918
AIR1966SC128; 1966CriLJ106; [1965]2SCR894
Mudholkar, J.1. This appeal and Criminal appeal No. 113/63 arise out of a joint trial of the appellant Mangaldas and the two appellants Daryanomal and Kodumal in Crl. A. 113 of 1963 for the contravention of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGahininath Bhimrao Patekar Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Mumbai
Feb-06-1987
CriminalFood Adulteration
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 7, 12, 14, 14A, 16, 20 and 30(1)
1987(2)BomCR524; 1987MhLJ153
ORDER1. The applicant-accused is the proprietor of M/s. Ganesh Dairy, 616, South Kasba, Solapur. The complainant-Food Inspector took a sample of buffalo milk from him on 17th May, 1981 at about 9.00 a.m. The said sample...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDinkar Keshav Bedbkar Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Apr-24-1969
ConstitutionService
(1969)71BOMLR867; 1970MhLJ364
Chandrachud J.1. The appellant brought a suit for a declaration that the order dated January 30, 1964, issued by respondent No. 2(ii), the Secretary, State Board of Literature & Culture, terminating his services in the Vishwakosha...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPhulchand Kesarimal Mutha Vs. D.R. Naik and anr.
Mumbai
Jan-09-1975
Criminal
1976CriLJ1946
ORDERBhole, J.1. The petitioner-accused was prosecuted for an offence punishable under Section 16 (1) (a) (i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act for having sold on 19-4-1973 Tur Dal, which was found to contain extraneous...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Maharashtra Vs. Jagdish B. Shah
Mumbai
Sep-05-1991
Criminal
1992(1)BomCR405; 1992CriLJ2394
V.B. Ganatra and ;C.S. Gosalia, Advs.
1. An issue of considerable importance has been canvassed on behalf of the original accused in this and the companion appeal which I am summarizing below. (1) Whether in a criminal trial, the consequences of which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Narsing Lingo Deshpande
Mumbai
Oct-01-1956
Food adulteration
(1957)59BOMLR141
Mr. Ganatra
Vyas, J.1. This is an appeal from a judgment of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Belgaum City, acquitting the respondent who was charged with having committed offences under Clauses (a) and (b) of Sub-section (1) of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Maharashtra Vs. B.B. Kothavade
Mumbai
Sep-17-1982
CriminalFood Adulteration
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act - Sections 2, 7 and 16; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules - Rule 9
1983(1)BomCR469
1. The State has preferred this appeal against the order of acquittal passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class of Malegaon on 9th of April 1979 in Criminal Case No. 618 of 1973. By the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »