Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr ganatra · Page 1 of about 20 results (0.045 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 31 1982

Ratansi Hirji JaIn Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-31-1982

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act - Sections 7, 16(1); Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules - Rule A-25.02

Reported in : 1982(2)BomCR590

ORDER1. The petitioner, hereinafter referred to as 'the accused', was prosecuted in Criminal Case No. 169 of 1978 in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kulaba at Alibag for an offence punishable under S....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 1965

Lalji Mulji Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-21-1965

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Reported in : (1965)67BOMLR484

Naik, J.1. The appellant, who would hereafter be called the accused, was convicted under Section 471 read with Section 394(1)(a)(ii) of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 201, in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 1998

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Shri R.A. Chandawarkar and Other

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-18-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Drug and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 16, 18, 20, 21(1 and 2), 23, 27 and 34; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 244, 245, 246, 247 and 401; Drugs and Cosmetic Rules, 1945 - Rules 46 and 47; Bombay Prevention of Adulteration Act, 1925 - Sections 14 and 16

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR519; 1999BomCR(Cri)519; (1999)3BOMLR394; 1999CriLJ4449; 1999(2)MhLj650

Advocate for Respondent : V.B. Ganatra, Adv.

ORDERS. Radhakrishnan, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel; Mr. D.S. Mhaispurkar, the learned A.P.P. for the V.B. Ganatra, the learned Counsel for the respondents.2. This is a Criminal Revision Application filed by the State of Maharashtra against...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 08 1965

Mangaldas Raghavji Ruparel and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-08-1965

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Criminal Law; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 182, 510 and 537; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 272 and 276; The Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 4(1), 7, 10, 10(3), 11, 13(1), 13(5), 16(1), 17(1) and 19(1); Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 12, 13, 24, 65, 66 and 83(1); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 8(1), 23(1), 23(1-A) and 24(1); Madras Prevention of Adulteration Act, 1918

Reported in : AIR1966SC128; 1966CriLJ106; [1965]2SCR894

Mudholkar, J.1. This appeal and Criminal appeal No. 113/63 arise out of a joint trial of the appellant Mangaldas and the two appellants Daryanomal and Kodumal in Crl. A. 113 of 1963 for the contravention of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 1987

Gahininath Bhimrao Patekar Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-06-1987

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 7, 12, 14, 14A, 16, 20 and 30(1)

Reported in : 1987(2)BomCR524; 1987MhLJ153

ORDER1. The applicant-accused is the proprietor of M/s. Ganesh Dairy, 616, South Kasba, Solapur. The complainant-Food Inspector took a sample of buffalo milk from him on 17th May, 1981 at about 9.00 a.m. The said sample...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 1969

Dinkar Keshav Bedbkar Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-24-1969

Subject : ConstitutionService

Reported in : (1969)71BOMLR867; 1970MhLJ364

Chandrachud J.1. The appellant brought a suit for a declaration that the order dated January 30, 1964, issued by respondent No. 2(ii), the Secretary, State Board of Literature & Culture, terminating his services in the Vishwakosha...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 1975

Phulchand Kesarimal Mutha Vs. D.R. Naik and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-09-1975

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1976CriLJ1946

ORDERBhole, J.1. The petitioner-accused was prosecuted for an offence punishable under Section 16 (1) (a) (i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act for having sold on 19-4-1973 Tur Dal, which was found to contain extraneous...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 1991

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Jagdish B. Shah

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-05-1991

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1992(1)BomCR405; 1992CriLJ2394

Advocate for Respondent : V.B. Ganatra and ;C.S. Gosalia, Advs.

1. An issue of considerable importance has been canvassed on behalf of the original accused in this and the companion appeal which I am summarizing below. (1) Whether in a criminal trial, the consequences of which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 1956

State Vs. Narsing Lingo Deshpande

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-01-1956

Subject : Food adulteration

Reported in : (1957)59BOMLR141

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ganatra

Vyas, J.1. This is an appeal from a judgment of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Belgaum City, acquitting the respondent who was charged with having committed offences under Clauses (a) and (b) of Sub-section (1) of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 1982

The State of Maharashtra Vs. B.B. Kothavade

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-17-1982

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act - Sections 2, 7 and 16; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules - Rule 9

Reported in : 1983(1)BomCR469

1. The State has preferred this appeal against the order of acquittal passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class of Malegaon on 9th of April 1979 in Criminal Case No. 618 of 1973. By the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial