Advanced Search Results

Muhammad RaisuddIn Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ConstitutionCriminal

Acts : Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 3, 3(1) and (3), and 4;; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 226 and 311(2);; Income Tax - Section 296-UD

Reported in : AIR1993Cal262

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Dipankar Gupta, Solicitor General, ;Mr. Gopal Law, ;Mr. S.K. Kundu, ;Mrs. Arati Dutta, ;Mr. S.C. Ukil and ;Mrs. Chhabi Roy (Das), Advs.

ORDERA.M. Bhattacharjee, C.J. 1. By a Notification issued under the provisions of S. 3 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 Jammat-e-Islami Hind (hereinafter referred to as JEIH) has been declared to be an Unlawful Association...

Thyssen Krupp Materials Ag vs.the Steel Authority of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Dipankar P. Gupta, Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Mr. Santosh Kumar, Mr. Jagmohan Sharma

$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:25. 04.2016 PRONOUNCED ON:20. 04.2017 FAO (OS) 150/2002 THYSSEN KRUPP MATERIALS AG ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Rishi Agarwala with Ms. Misha Rohatagi,...

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and ors. Vs. Kec International Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Commercial Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21, 226 and 227

Advocate for Respondent : Anindya Mitra, ;Abhijit Chatterjee, ;O.P. Jhunjhunwalla and ;Anirban Roy, Advs. for Respdt. No. 1 and 2 and ;Dipankar Prasad Gupta, ;Jayanta Kumar Mitra, ;Ranjan Bachawat, ;Sandeep Narain, ;U.S. Menon

Surinder Singh Nijjar, C.J.1. This appeal has been filed by Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the BSNL) against the judgment and order dated July 8, 2009 passed by Justice Sanjib Banerjee in W.P....

Dr. Banipada Saha Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 226(2) and 309; ;Indian Police Service (Pay) Rules, 1954 - Rule 8; ;Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 2; ;Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 - Rule 93.3

Reported in : (1995)1CALLT337(HC),99CWN455

Advocate for Respondent : Bhaskar Gupta and Sukhendu Banerjee, Advs. for Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6, ;S.N. Mukherjee for Respondent No. 7 and ;R.C. Ghose, Adv. for Respondent No. 5

Gitesh Ranjan Bhattacharjee, J.1. The petitioner is a member of the Indian Police Service (I.P.S., for short). He was appointed to the I.P.S. as a direct recruit in 1963 and was allotted to the Orissa Cadre....

Environment Awareness Forum Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Reported in : AIR1999SC1495; 1999CriLJ464; JT1998(9)SC178; 1998(3)SCALE669; (1998)2SCC59

ORDERI.A. No. 161. We have heard Mr. Dipankar Gupta, learned Senior counsel appearing for the officials of the State Government who have filed their counters in response to the notice issued by this Court. We have...

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Contempt of CourtCivil

Reported in : 1999(1)SCALE466

ORDER1. While issuing notice on the application filed by the State of Assam and the Government of Nagaland on 10.12.1998, we had on being prima facie satisfied that earlier order of this Court had been respected...

Rudra Kumar SaIn and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 32 and 311(2); Delhi Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1970 - Rules 1, 2, 5(2), 7, 8(2), 11, 16 and 17

Reported in : AIR2000SC2808; JT2000(9)SC299; 2000(6)SCALE54; (2000)8SCC25; [2000]Supp2SCR573; 2001(1)LC13(SC); (2000)3UPLBEC2373

Advocate for Respondent : Jaspal Singh and ; Padam Singh, Advs.

G.B. Pattanaik, J.1. These writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution by the officers of Delhi Higher Judicial Service, some by the promotees and others by direct recruits, intact, raise the question as to...

A.C. Roy and Co. (Private) Ltd. Vs. Taslim and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2(1) and 3

Reported in : AIR1968Cal114,71CWN531,(1967)IILLJ307Cal

Advocate for Respondent : A.C. Mitter, Standing Counsel and ;Dipankar Gupta, Amicus curiae

Sinha, C.J.1. This is an appeal against an order made by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, West Bengal D/-30th May 1959. The facts are briefly as follows: The applicant for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act,...

Kalyan Kumar Basak Vs. Salil Kumar Basak and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Calcutta High Court Original Side Rules, 1914 - Rules 8 and 32

Reported in : AIR1986Cal298,1986(1)CHN81,(1988)2CompLJ248(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Chatterji, Adv. (for Nos. 10, 11 and 12) and ;Dipankar Gupta, amicus curiae

R.N. Pyne, J. 1. On 2nd May 1983 the appellant made an application before M.M. Dutt and Monoj Kumar Mukherjee, JJ. and obtained an order granting leave to the appellantto file the above appeal against the...

Anthony Allen Fletcher Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1975CriLJ304

N. C. Talukdar, J.1. This is an application for bail on behalf of the accused-applicant, Anthony Allen Fletcher, with notice to the State. The application is opposed.2. The applicant was arrested on 26-4-1973 from the Waverley...