Advanced Search Results

JaIn Shudh Vanaspati Ltd. and Others Vs. S.R. Patankar and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(18), 2(23), 2(25) and 2(27)

Reported in : 1983(13)ELT923(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Dhanuka

1. The Petitioners, holders of a valid import licence, imported palm oil in bulk, 1996.6115 mts from Malaysia and 2902-3001 mts from Penang. Both the consignments were shipped to Bombay on M.V. 'Dolphin II'. The vessel...

Krishan Oil Cake Industries Vs. S.R. Patankar, Assistant Collector of ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act 1962 - Sections 2(15), 12, 12(1), 15 and 25

Reported in : 1983(14)ELT2153(Bom); [1981]127ITR591(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Dhanuka

1. The facts stated relate to the first mentioned petition in the title. On 1st July 1977 a notification was issued under Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962, whereby the Govt. of India exempted palmoleine...

Sulekha Sandip Parikh and Others Vs. S.N. Nadkarni, 6th Income-tax Off ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(1), 2(14), 10(1), 45, 47 and 256(2)

Reported in : (1986)52CTR(Bom)82; [1986]159ITR775(Bom); [1986]24TAXMAN474(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Dhanuka

Pratap, J.1. This petition under article 226 of the Constitution arises out of proceedings under the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter 'the Act').2. One Dhanvantrai Keshavlal Shah and his wife Prabhavati, petitioner No. 3, were members of...

Vardhman Spg. and Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1983LC45D(Bombay)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Dhanuka

S.P. Bharucha, J.1. The facts briefly stated are of the first petition. The petitioners imported viscose staple fibre, pursuant to a valid licence, on board the S.S. 'Georgios Paravalos' and the S.S. 'Vishwa Amitabh'. The former...

Devpal Dhir Vs. B.V. Kumar, Collector of Customs (Appeals) and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act - Sections 17 and 31

Reported in : 1983(12)ELT796(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Dhanuka

1. The petitioner imported into India three consignments for Australian Greecy Wool by S. S. 'Staraar Lagos'. The vessel entered Indian territorial waters on 10th June, 1977. On 13th June, 1977 three bills of entry were...

Petron Engineering Construction (P.) Ltd. and Another Vs. Central Boar ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80-O

Reported in : (1987)89BOMLR383; (1987)65CTR(Bom)314; [1988]171ITR80(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Dhanuka

Bharucha, J.1. The Judgment and the order of Jahagirdar J. (See : [1987]165ITR668(Bom) ) dismissing the appellant's writ petition is the subject matter of this appeal.2. The appellants applied to the Central Board of Direct Taxes...

State of Maharashtra Vs. Kusum Charudutt Bharma Upadhye

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1981)83BOMLR75; 1981MhLJ93

Madon, J.1. The circumstances which led to this Special Bench being constituted are that on September 10, 1980 a Division Bench of this High Court consisting of Madon and Shah JJ., while hearing an Appeal, namely,...

The Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. the Elphinstone Spinning and Wea ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ExciseCustom

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 7, 8, 9, 9A and 9(1); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 2, 8(1), 9A, 9A(1), 9A(2), 9A(3), 9A(7), 9A(8) and 9A(9); Provisional collection of Taxes Act, 1931; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 213; Finance Act, 1968; Finance Act, 1956; Custom Act, 1962 - Sections 3, 12, 12(1), 15 and 25(1); Customs Tariff Act, 1975;Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 213; Finance Act, 1968; Finance Act, 1956; Custom Act, 1962 - Sections 3, 12, 12(1), 15 and 25(1); Customs Tariff Act, 1975

Reported in : 1978(2)ELT680(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Parekh

Madon, J.1. This is an appeal filed by the Union of India and the Collector and Assistant Collector of Central Excise against the judgment and order of Rege J. by which he inter alia allowed the...

Shantilal Ambalal Mehta Vs. M.A. Rangaswamy

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1977)79BOMLR633; 1977MhLJ587

Chandurkar, J.1. There are several petitions pending in this Court filed by litigants under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as it originally stood before the Constitution of India was amended by the Constitution (Forty-second...

Vasant Abaji Mandke Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ConstitutionDirect Taxation

Reported in : (1979)81BOMLR542

Deshpande, J.1. Petitioners in this group of petitions are all legal practitioners two of them having enrolled as such practitioners after retirement from service. Under Section 3 of the Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings...