Advanced Search Results

State of Maharashtra Vs. Kusum Charudutt Bharma Upadhye

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1981)83BOMLR75; 1981MhLJ93

Madon, J.1. The circumstances which led to this Special Bench being constituted are that on September 10, 1980 a Division Bench of this High Court consisting of Madon and Shah JJ., while hearing an Appeal, namely,...

Vasant Abaji Mandke Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ConstitutionDirect Taxation

Reported in : (1979)81BOMLR542

Deshpande, J.1. Petitioners in this group of petitions are all legal practitioners two of them having enrolled as such practitioners after retirement from service. Under Section 3 of the Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings...

N.P. Nathwani Vs. the Commissioner of Police

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1976)78BOMLR1

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Chagla

R.M. Kantawala, C.J.1. This petition relates to a very important question regarding basic human natural rights to hold a peaceful assembly of some lawyers who are invited by individual invitations to discuss civil liberties and the...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Rao and Company

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Goa, Daman and Diu (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1964

Reported in : (1986)52CTR(Bom)70; [1986]161ITR806(Bom); [1986]24TAXMAN452(Bom)

Kania, J.1. These are four references under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The two questions referred to us for our determination are as follows :'(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. National Rayon Corporation Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 35(2) and 37

Reported in : (1984)86BOMLR527; (1985)44CTR(Bom)103; [1985]155ITR413(Bom); [1984]19TAXMAN485(Bom)

Bharucha, J.1. Three questions are posed in this reference under s. 256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The first question is referred at the instance of the Revenue and the second and third questions at the...

The Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. the Elphinstone Spinning and Wea ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ExciseCustom

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 7, 8, 9, 9A and 9(1); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 2, 8(1), 9A, 9A(1), 9A(2), 9A(3), 9A(7), 9A(8) and 9A(9); Provisional collection of Taxes Act, 1931; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 213; Finance Act, 1968; Finance Act, 1956; Custom Act, 1962 - Sections 3, 12, 12(1), 15 and 25(1); Customs Tariff Act, 1975;Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 213; Finance Act, 1968; Finance Act, 1956; Custom Act, 1962 - Sections 3, 12, 12(1), 15 and 25(1); Customs Tariff Act, 1975

Reported in : 1978(2)ELT680(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Parekh

Madon, J.1. This is an appeal filed by the Union of India and the Collector and Assistant Collector of Central Excise against the judgment and order of Rege J. by which he inter alia allowed the...

Shantilal Ambalal Mehta Vs. M.A. Rangaswamy

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1977)79BOMLR633; 1977MhLJ587

Chandurkar, J.1. There are several petitions pending in this Court filed by litigants under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as it originally stood before the Constitution of India was amended by the Constitution (Forty-second...

JaIn Shudh Vanaspati Ltd. and Others Vs. S.R. Patankar and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(18), 2(23), 2(25) and 2(27)

Reported in : 1983(13)ELT923(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Dhanuka

1. The Petitioners, holders of a valid import licence, imported palm oil in bulk, 1996.6115 mts from Malaysia and 2902-3001 mts from Penang. Both the consignments were shipped to Bombay on M.V. 'Dolphin II'. The vessel...

Devpal Dhir Vs. B.V. Kumar, Collector of Customs (Appeals) and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act - Sections 17 and 31

Reported in : 1983(12)ELT796(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Dhanuka

1. The petitioner imported into India three consignments for Australian Greecy Wool by S. S. 'Staraar Lagos'. The vessel entered Indian territorial waters on 10th June, 1977. On 13th June, 1977 three bills of entry were...

The Chemist a Firm Vs. Ishwarlal Karsondas Kapadia

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 15 and 15(1)

Reported in : AIR1969Bom282; (1969)71BOMLR31; ILR1969Bom125; 1969MhLJ314

Advocate for Respondent : S.R. Garg, Adv.

ORDER1. This is a revision application by the original defendants in R. A. E. Suit No. 6184 of 1964 in the Court of Small Causes at Bombay. The plaintiffs filed a suit against them for ejectment...