Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr d murugesan · Page 1 of about 23 results (0.109 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 08 2010

M/S.Creative Infrastructure, Vs. the Government of Puducherry, and ors ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-08-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.D.Murugesan, Adv.

1. The petitioner in all the three writ petitions is a firm of partnership represented by its Partner styling itself as "Creative Infrastructure".2.In the first writ petition, i.e. W.P.No.6881 of 2009, the prayer of the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 1999

A. Selvaraj Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Through Its Secretary, Adi-dravida ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-19-1999

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Consititution of India -- Article 226

Reported in : 1999(3)CTC441

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. D. Murugesan, Government Pleader Adv.

ORDERJudgment pronounced by A.C. Agarwal, CJ. 1. Admit. Mr.D. Murugesan, Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of respondents 1 and 2. On application made on behalf of the appellant, Respondent No.3 is deleted. By consent the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 1997

M. Krishnan and 44 Others Vs. the District Collector, Erode District, ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-06-1997

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 -- Sections 27, 47-A (1) (2) (3), 48, 64; Tamil Nadu Stamp (Prevention of Undervaluation) Rules, 1968, Rule 3; Constitution of India -- Article 14; Registration Act, 1908 -- Sections 61(2)

Reported in : 1998(3)CTC366

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. D. Murugesan,;S.G.P. Mrs. T. Kokilavani G.A. Adv.

ORDER1. This Court ordered notice of motion to the respondents and the respondents have also filed a counter, besides produced the documents. 2. Common arguments were addressed by the learned counsel for petitioners as well as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 04 1998

State Lorry Owners' Federation Vs. the Superintending Engineer (NH)

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-04-1998

Subject : Motor VehiclesOther Taxes

Reported in : (1999)1MLJ29

ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. State Lorry Owners' Federation, Tamil Nadu have approached this Court to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent Superintending Engineer (N.H) Salem-4 to forbear from taking action any further with his Tender-Cum-Auction...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 1995

M. Ayyasamy Vs. the District Educational Officer, (Elementary Educatio ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-27-1995

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : (1996)2MLJ391

Raju, J.1. above writ appeal has been filed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 23.8.1995 in W.P. No. 8856 of 1995, whereunder the learned Judge while allowing the writ petition filed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 1993

M/S. Ganesh Bhavan and Etc. Etc. Vs. the Health Officer, Corporation o ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-10-1993

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : T.N. Public Health Act, 1939 - Sections 17 to 26, 108, 112-A and 113(2); Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 11-B; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 114; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860

Reported in : AIR1994Mad119

Advocate for Respondent : Dr. Murugesan, Adv.

ORDER1. Writ Petition No. 4570 of 1993 is filed by Madras Hotels Associations represented by its Secretary and the prayer in the writ petition is to the following effect :'..... to issue a writ of prohibition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 1986

Gunasekaran (Deceased) and ors. Vs. the Tamil Nadu State Housing Board ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-03-1986

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : [1987(54)FLR244]; (1986)IILLJ408Mad

ORDER1. Petitioners are legal representatives of one S. Gunasekaran, who joined Government Service as a Junior Engineer and was working under the first respondent. He filed the writ petition to quash the order of the first...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 1985

V. Prasad Vs. State Bank of India, Coimbatore

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-09-1985

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1987)ILLJ404Mad

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R. Sreekrishnan

ORDER1. The petitioners are employees of the State Bank of India. The petitioner in W.P. No. 6860 of 1985 is attached to the Ganapathy Branch, Coimbatore. The petitioner in W.P. No. 9205 of 1985 is attached...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 1997

S. Murugadhas Vs. State Bank of India and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-06-1997

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226

Reported in : (1997)IILLJ947Mad

Advocate for Respondent : G. Masilamani, Addl. S.G.

ORDERA.R. Lakshmanan, J. 1. This Writ Appeal is filed against the order of a learned single Judge of this Court dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant herein 5 with a direction to approach the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 1989

State Bank Staff Union, State Bank of India Officers's Association etc ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-24-1989

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act; State Bank of India Act, 1955 - Sections 18; Payment of Wages Act - Sections 7(2); Trade Unions Act, 1926; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 43A and 226

Reported in : [1989(59)FLR431]; (1989)ILLJ554Mad

Venkataswami, J.1. In all the writ petitions though the prayers differ in form, the ultimate relief sought in substance and essence is the same. Hence, by consent, all the writ petitions are taken up together and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial