Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr chengalvarayan · Page 1 of about 21 results (0.064 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 03 1978

George Harris Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-03-1978

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1979)IILLJ65Mad

V. Balasubramaniyan, J.1. This is a petition for review of judgment of a Division Bench comprising Kailasam, Officiating Chief Justice, and me.2. Our judgment was delivered in a service case. It related to fixation of seniority...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 20 1978

Binny Limited Vs. Superintendent, Central Excise and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-20-1978

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excises Act - Sections 2, 3 and 4

Reported in : 1979CENCUS107D; 1979(4)ELT65(Mad)

Natarajan, J.1. The petitioner impugns a demand notice relating to the levy of differential duty of excise and prays for a writ of certiorari to quash the notice. The petitioner is the owner of a textile...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 1978

Dollar Company Vs. Joint Secretary, Ministry of Finance (Department of ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-22-1978

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Excises Act - Sections 4(3)

Reported in : 1979CENCUS230D; 1979(4)ELT79(Mad)

Natarajan, J.1. The precise question for consideration in this writ petition is how exactly deductions on retail price of patent or proprietary medicines should be made for arriving at the assessable value of the goods for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 15 1978

A. Ramiah Nadar Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Finance and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-15-1978

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 35, 35(2) and 36; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 40; Limitation Act

Reported in : 1979CENCUS103D; 1979(4)ELT136(Mad)

Mohan, J.1. The plaintiff who has lost in both the courts below, has preferred this second appeal in so far as he could not get a declaration or injunction that the Central Excise Authority had wrongly...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 1978

Binny Limited and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-05-1978

Subject : Excise

Acts : Finance Act, 1972; Companies Act; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 17 - Schedule - Article 96; Indian Contract Act - Sections 72; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1979CENCUS290D; 1979(4)ELT230(Mad)

1. The common question for consideration in all these petitions is whether the respondents were entitled to levy and collect excise duty on blended yarn prior to the introduction of Item No. 18E by the Finance...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 1971

Erode Transports (P.) Ltd. Vs. Sadasivam Motor Transports (P.) Ltd. an ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-08-1971

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : (1971)2MLJ74

ORDER1. The first respondent sought for a variation of their existing permit from Vellakoil to Erode, by extending the same from Erode to Malayampalayam. The Regional Transport Authority was of the view that as a part...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 1967

Abdul Malick Vs. the Collector of Dharmapuri and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-02-1967

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1968)1MLJ9

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Chengalvarayan, Mr. Chengalvorayan

ORDERP.S. Kailasam, J.1. This petition is filed for the issue of a writ of certiorari calling for the records of the Commissioner of Land Revenue and Settlement of Estates, Board of Revenue, relating to B.P.Rt. 2343(1)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 16 1978

The Union of India (Uoi), Represented by the Executive Engineer, Coimb ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-16-1978

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : (1979)2MLJ129

ORDERV. Balasubrahmanyan, J.1. This civil miscellaneous appeal raises a point about the construction of an arbitration Clause in a building construction contract between the Union Government and a C.P.W.D. contractor. The contract was for construction of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1964

Nafisa Zahara Begum Vs. the Corporation of Madras

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-31-1964

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Madras City Municipal Act, 1919 - Sections 137-B; Madras City Municipal Rules - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1965Mad515; (1965)2MLJ157

ORDER(1) This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution for the issue of a writ of certiorari to quash a notice issued by the respondent, the Corporation of Madras, under S. 137-B of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 1982

S.N. Rangaswamy Vs. S. Muthurama Reddy

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-01-1982

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1982)2MLJ122

S. Swamikkannu, J.1. This is a petition by the tenant questioning the order of the learned appellate authority under the provisions of Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act (XVIII of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial