Advanced Search Results

The Association of the Traders carrying the Food Business of various F ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

G.S. Kulkarni, J. 1. Admit. Respondents waive service. By consent of the learned Counsel for the parties and at their request taken up for final hearing. 2. This batch of petitions raise a common challenge. The...

National Sports Club of India and ors. Vs. Nandlal Dwarkadas Chhabria ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Sections 1, 9 and 18; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9 - Order 1, Rule 8 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; National Sports Club, Rules - Rules 6, 12, 22 and 27; National Sports Club Regulations; Limitation Act, 1963 - Articles 58 and 113

Reported in : 1998(1)ALLMR236; 1997(3)BomCR565

Advocate for Respondent : K.R. Bulchandani and ;J.P. Shah, Advs., i/b., Kamal & Co. in F.A. 1625 and ;V.T. Walawalkar and ;M.D. Naik, Advs. in F.A. 1618

R.G. Vaidyanatha, J.1. These are two appeals filed by the respective parties against the judgment and decree dated 18-7-1996 in Suit No. 4457/95 on the file of City Civil Court, Bombay. First Appeal No. 1618/96 is...

Sva Udyog Viniyog Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111 and 111(d); Customs Tariff Act, 1975

Reported in : 1993LC376(Bombay); 1993(65)ELT20(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. K.R. Bulchandani and ;Mr. R.C. Master, Adv.

Pendse, J.1. The appellants imported a consignment of almonds-in shell declared as 'seeds of almonds' and claimed clearance against various REP licences for the export product covered under Appendix 17, clause G-2(i) of Import and Export...

K.F. Mody and Co. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1989(20)LC68(Bombay)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bulchandani

S.P. Bharucha, J.1. The petitioners are an import and export firm. This petition concerns the import by them of dry prunes under an open general licence.2. The Import Policy for 1978-79 provided in paragraph 186 that...

Sunil B. Bhosale Vs. Kamal Organic Chemicals A Division of Kirti Manor ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Revati Mohite Dere, J. 1. The appellant has impugned the order dated 20th November, 2015, passed by the learned Single Judge, by which his Notice of Motion, seeking reconsideration of the condition, imposed by the learned...

Union of India and Others Vs. Suwidhi Enterprises and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1989(40)ELT317(Bom)

Tipnis, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated 19th February 1985 passed by the learned judge of this Court by which he was pleased to allow the writ petition filed by the...

Uco Bank, Churchgate Branch Through Mr. K. Venkatachalam Vs. Kanji Man ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilBanking

Acts : Banking Companies Act, 1949; Indian Partnership Act; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002; NPA Act - Sections 2(1), 4(2), 8(1), 10(3), 13, 13(2), 13(3)(A), 13(4), 13(6), 13(8), 13(13), 14, 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(3), 17(5), 17(7), 19, 31, 34, 35, 36 and 37; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 29, 29(3) and 43(4); Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 - Sections 4(2) and 13; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993; Debts Recovery Tribunal Act - Sections 22 and 24; Security Interest and Recovery of Debts Laws (Amendment) Act, 2004; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 5, 34 and 34(3); Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30 and 53; Arbi

Reported in : 2008(2)ALLMR512; 2008(3)BomCR290; (2008)110BOMLR744; 2008(4)MhLj424

Advocate for Respondent : K.R. Bulchandani and ;K.K. Shroff, Advs., i/b., ;Akshar Laws

Ranjana Desai, J.1. The petitioner is a body corporate incorporated under the provisions of the Banking Companies Act, 1949, having its head office at 10, BTM, Sarani, Kolkata, and branch offices all over India, including one...

Naarden (India) Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act - Sections 11A

Reported in : 1989(20)LC369(Bombay); 1989(39)ELT530(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bulchandani

1. The petitioners manufacture edible flavouring agents. On 1st March 1975 a notification was issued by the Central Government exempting inter alia all kinds of food produced and food preparations falling under Item 68 of the...

Hindustan Cocoa Products Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B

Reported in : 1995(1)BomCR555; 1994LC662(Bombay); 1994(74)ELT525(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R.R. Bulchandani and ;Mr. R.C. Sidhwa, Advs.

Dr. B.P. Saraf, J.1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of the Assistant Collector, Central Excise, Division-II, Thane, dated 6th May, 1985 rejecting its claim for refund of excise duty amounting to Rs. 1,80,301.38 in...

Forbes Forbes Campbell and Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1991LC398(Bombay); 1993(63)ELT23(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Shri K.R. Bulchandani, Adv.

Bharucha, J.1. Rule, returnable forthwith.Mr. Bulchandani waives service on behalf of the respondents.Heard.The petitioners are shipping agents for foreign shipowners in Bombay. In the month of October 1990 they have been served by the respondents with...