Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr bhudeb chatterjee · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.024 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 16 2012

Sri Mrinal Kanti Panda Vs. Sri Tapan Kumar Kamila and Others

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-16-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Ashim Kumar Banerjee, J. The plaintiff, the respondent above named filed a suit against the appellant for specific performance of a contract whereby the father of the appellant sought to agree to sell the subject property...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 2008

Eastern Coal Fields Limited Vs. Central Government Industrial Tribunal ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-22-2008

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Contract Labour Abolition Act, 1970 - Section 10; ;Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 25B and 25D; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : (2008)IVCALLT42(HC),2008(4)CHN640,[2008(118)FLR1176]

Advocate for Respondent : Bhudeb Chatterjee and ;Sanjib Ghosh, Advs.

Ashim Kumar Banerjee, J. 1. Facts:Dispute relates to absorption of 14 mazdoors working in Shyamsunderpur Colliery belonging to Eastern Coalfields Limited, the appellant above named. Out of 14 mazdoors 12 were female being the respondent Nos....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 2010

Hscl-sipl (Jv) Vs. National Highways Authority of India

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-10-2010

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.Bhudeb Chatterjee, Adv.

The Court : The averments made in the Section 9 application do not show that this Court has jurisdiction. However, it is very extraordinary that such point was not taken at the earliest stage. As a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 10 2010

Hscl-sipl (Jv) Vs. National Highways Authority of India

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-10-2010

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.Bhudeb Chatterjee, Adv.

The Court : The averments made in the Section 9 application do not show that this Court has jurisdiction. However, it is very extraordinary that such point was not taken at the earliest stage. As a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial