Advanced Search Results

Sreedhara S. Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : AIR2002SC2459; [2002(92)FLR552]; JT2001(10)SC419; 2001(6)KarLJ571; 2002LabIC2333; (2002)9SCC441; 2002(4)SCT619(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bhat

ORDER  1. Permission granted to file the SLPs.  2. Delay condoned.  3. Leave granted.  4. These appeals are directed against the directions of the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka while dismissing the appeals...

Avtar Krishen Koul Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2007CriLJ3450,2008(1)JKJ407

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bhat

Nirmal Singh, J.1. This appeal is directed against judgment order dated 31st of March 2001, passed by the learned 1st Additional Session Judge, Jammu, vide which the appellant has been convicted and sentenced as under:In the...

Padmakar Vinayak Deshmukh and ors. Vs. Union of India, Thr. Its Secret ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Environment

Acts : Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 - Rule 5 (3)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bhat

1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties. 2. By this petition, which is filed in public interest, the petitioners have challenged the public hearing conducted by respondent no.3-Regional Officer, Maharashtra Pollution...

State of Karnataka and Another Vs. K.B. Urushabendra Kumar and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionService

Reported in : AIR1994SC1528

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bhat

1. This appeal by special leave is directed against an order dated 22-8-1990 passed by the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal, Bangalore in Application No. 2781 of 1991.2. It appears that by an advertisement dated August 13, 1987,...

Harminder Singh Vs. Jandk; Special Tribunal and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bhat

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU. OWP No. 270 OF 201.Harminder Singh Petitioners J&K Special Tribunal & Ors. Respondent !Mr. B. L. Kalgotra, Advocate ^Mr. P. N. Bhat, Advocate Honble Mr. Justice Muzaffar Hussain...

Veerappa Mallappa Hadli and anr. Vs. Nagappa Fakirappa Hadli and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Easements Act - Sections 7, 13 and 28; Prescription Act, 1832 - Sections 3; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 52 and 57

Reported in : AIR1965Kant292; AIR1965Mys292; ILR1965KAR194; (1965)1MysLJ375

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bhat

(1) This second appeal by the defendants is directed against the judgment and decree passed against them by the Second Additional District Judge, Dharwar in Civil Appeal No. 342 of 1958 directing the issue of a...

Smt. Parvathamma Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 48-A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101, 102 and 103

Reported in : 1999(2)KarLJ224

Advocate for Respondent : Sri H. Subramanya Jois, Senior Advocate and ;Smt. M.R. Shanthakumari, High Court Government Pleader

ORDER1. This writ petition has been very vehemently agitated on a point that is of considerable importance to judicial proceedings. The petitioner before me Parvathamma claims that she is entitled to the grant of occupancy rights...

Malvika Madan Sehgal and anr. Vs. M.M. Sehgal Limited and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 2

Reported in : 1997IAD(Delhi)512; [1998]91CompCas133(Delhi); 65(1997)DLT381

Vijender Jain, J. (1) This is an application (CA No. 2784/94 ) filed by the plaintiffs praying, inter alia, that R restraint order be passed against defendant Nos.l to 28 from alienating, transferring, selling, mortgaging or...

Smt. Parvathamma Vs. State of Karnataka of ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 48A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 23 Rule 3

Reported in : ILR1998KAR3950

M.F. Saldanha, J.1. This Writ Petition has been very vehemently agitated on a point that is of considerable importance to judicial proceedings. The petitioner before me Parvathamma claims that she is entitled to the grant of...

P.S. Ranakrishna Reddy Vs. M.K. Bhagyalakshmi and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 20 and 23

Reported in : AIR2007SC1256; 2007(2)AWC1614(SC); (2007)2CALLT54(SC); 2007(2)CTC357; JT2007(4)SC223; (2007)4MLJ193(SC); 2007(3)SCALE409; (2007)10SCC231

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Bhat, ; D.P. Chaturvedi and ; N.P.S. Panwar, Advs.

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Defendant No. 1 in the suit is Appellant before us. He was admittedly owner of a residential house admeasuring 40 ft. x 30 ft bearing No. 148 (New Plot No. 78), 8th Cross,...