Advanced Search Results

S.P. Murgai Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1993IIIAD(Delhi)355; 1993(27)DRJ193

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bansal

D.P. Wadhwa, J. (1) Rule D.B. We have heard the matter in detail and proceed to decide the matter. (2) By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution the petitioner, a service officer, seeks...

Sonia Sareen Vs. Shaheed Sukhdev College of Business Studies

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bansal

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:31. 01.2014 + W.P.(C) 746/2014 SONIA SAREEN ..... Petitioner versus SHAHEED SUKHDEV COLLEGE OF BUSINESS STUDIES ..... Respondent ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS...

Nirmal Jerath and ors. Vs. Sadhu Ram Sharma and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 15(1)

Reported in : AIR1973Delhi55; 8(1972)DLT465

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bansal

Dalip K. Kapur, J. (1) This is an appeal against a decision of the Rent Control Tribunal passed in appeal against an order under Section 15(1) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. The appellants are...

Ratna Sagar Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Trisea Publications and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : 1997(1)ARBLR30(Delhi); 64(1996)DLT539

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. K.G. Bansal, Mr. Bansal

K. Ramamoorthy, J. (1) The Applicant M/s. Ratna Sagar Private Limited has filed the suit claiming the following reliefs : '(i) For an order for perpetual injunction restraining the defendants, their agents, assigns, employees, successors, servants,...

induss Food Products and Equipments Ltd. Vs. Rani Sati Ice Cream Pvt. ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1; Trade Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2

Reported in : 65(1997)DLT802

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bansal

K. Ramamoorthy, J. (1) After the conclusion of the arguments by the learned Counsel for the parties the words of Justice Parker which were uttered in the year 1906 came to my mind and they are...

Baldev Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : 2007(3)ARBLR103(P& H)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bansal

Vijender Jain, C.J.1. This order of mine shall dispose of Arbitration Case Nos. 56 and 57 of 2006, as both the petitions contain same questions of facts and law.2. This petition has been filed by the...

Hem Raj Arya and ors. Vs. Election Commission, Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Election

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1995(32)DRJ231

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bansal

D.K. Jain, J.(1) Rule D.B. (2) Since in this matter a very short question is involved and we have heard counsel for the parties at length, we propose to dispose of the writ petition at this...

Subhash Chand Vs. Trilok Chand

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : 1997IVAD(Delhi)576; 67(1997)DLT754; 1997RLR464

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bansal

Usha Mehra, J. (1) The present respondent (petitioner before the Trial Court) sought eviction in respect of one room, one Kata with common use of W.C. on the first floor of property bearing No. 8362 constructed...

M/s. Johnson Appliances (P) Ltd. Vs. H.E. Industries and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bansal

Manmohan Singh, J. 1. The plaintiff has filed the abovementioned suit for infringement of registered trademark "JOHNSON", passing off, rendition of accounts, damages etc. against the defendants. 2. The plaintiff is a Company existing under the...

Mahavir Prashad Vs. Sukhdev Mongia and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32(3); Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 5(2); Slum Area (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956 - Sections 19

Reported in : 40(1990)DLT82; 1990RLR95

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bansal

R.N. Pyne, J. (1) This Regular First Appeal has been filed by the defendant/appellant Sfari Mahavir Prashad against the decree passed by the Additional District Judge dated 10th July, 1986 in Suit No. 224 of 1984...