Advanced Search Results

Mahesh Chander Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : 36(1988)DLT46

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bakshi

Charanjit Talwar, J.(1) Mahesh Chander, the appellant berein, challenges his conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. He has also appealed against the order sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay...

State Vs. Vijay Kumar and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 378(5)

Reported in : 1989(2)Crimes546; 37(1989)DLT16

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bakshi, Mr. Mathur

Charanjit Talwar, J.(1) A preliminary objection to the maintainability of this appeal by which acquittal of the respondents is sought to be set aside has been raised. The plea is that the appeal is time barred....

Shaista Aftab and Anr Vs. Union of India Through the Under Secretary t ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mrs. Bakshi Vibha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S)No.1599 of 2016 1. Shaista Aftab.2. Pardaz Aftab. … ...Petitioners -Versus- 1. Union of India through the Under Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Personnel, Public...

Falak Naaz & Ors. vs Raj Kumar Saraswat

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bakshi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 08.05.2026+ RFA(COMM) 98/2025 CM APPL. 9997/2025 CM APPL. 6536/2026FALAK NAAZ & ORS. .....APPELLANTSThrough: Mr. Pawan Reley, Mr. Kashif Athar., Mr. Akshay Lodhi,...

Usmanbhai Chandbhai Mansuri Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20, 29, 42, 53A, 67 and 114; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 24; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164

Reported in : (2003)3GLR1982

Advocate for Respondent : B.D. Desai, A.P.P. for respondent No. 1 and; Asim J. Pandya, Adv. for Respondent No. 2

H. H. MEHTA, J. 1.The appellant who was an accused in Sessions Case No. 358 of 1995 before the learned Additional City Sessions Judge, Court No. 9, Ahmedabad, has, by preferring this appeal under Section 374(2)...

Jer Rutton Kavasmaneck @ Jer Jawahar Thadani and Another Vs. Gharda Ch ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Oral Judgment: 1. Admit. By consent of the parties, the present appeal was heard finally at the admission stage and is disposed of by this Judgment. 2. The appellants have formulated following questions of law for...

Jamuna Prosad Vs. Motilal Santhalia and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 73

Reported in : AIR1950Cal63,54CWN182

Advocate for Respondent : Chandra Sekhar Sen and ;Khitindra Kumar Mitter, Advs.

G.N. Das, J.1. This appeal is at the instance of the defendant and is directed against the judgment and decree dated 29th March 1946 passed by Mr. P. P. I. Vaidyanathan, learned District Judge, Malda, affirming...

T.R. Kalra Vs. State and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Jammu and Kashmir Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 351; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 173, 190(1) and 204; ;Jammu and Kashmir Prevention of Corruption Act - Section 5(2); ;Ranbir Penal Code (IPC) - Section 120B

Reported in : 2004(1)JKJ595

Advocate for Respondent : Nemo for the Private

Y.P. Nargotra, J.1. 'Whether a Magistrate can on taking cognizance, implead a person as an accused in a case in which such person has not been arrayed as an accused by the investigating agency on the...

Lamba Bandare Alias Lomba Bodra Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 166 of 2013 Against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 22.12.2003 and 23.12.2003 passed by Sri Baj Kishore Pandey, learned Sessions Judge, Seraikella, in Sessions Trial No. 156 of...

Shri Siddaram Ramchandra Shinde Vs. the Chief Engineer and Member, Ind ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 227 and 309

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR339; 2008(3)BomCR199; [2008(117)FLR230]; 2008(3)MhLj520

Advocate for Respondent : A.R.S. Baxi, Adv. for Respondent No. 1

B.H. Marlapalle, J.1. This Petition impugns the Judgement and order dated 16-1-1996 rendered by the Industrial Court at Pune thereby dismissing Comp(ULP)No. 104/1990 filed by the Petitioner and consequently his prayer for promotion to the post...