Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr b sen · Page 1 of about 161 results (0.172 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 19 1971

Praduman Kumar JaIn Vs. All India Institute of Medical Sciences and or ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-19-1971

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; All India Institute of Medical Sciences Regulations, 1958 - Regulation 4(9); Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 - Rules 14

Reported in : ILR1972Delhi256

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. B. Sen

S.N. Andley, J.(1) This is an appeal against the judgment dated February 26, 1971, of the learned Single Judge dismissing the petition (Civil Writ No. 961 of 1970) filed by the appellant for the issue of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 1971

Pillani Investment Corporation Ltd. Vs. I.T.O. 'A' Ward, Calcutta and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-23-1971

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : AIR1972SC236; [1972]83ITR217(SC); (1972)1SCC122; [1972]2SCR502

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. B. Sen

S.M. Sikri, C.J.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Calcutta (D.N. Sinha, C.J., and A. K. Mukerjee, J.) dismissing the appeal of the appellants from the judgment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 1969

Raymon Engineering Works Ltd. Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-01-1969

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 269

Reported in : ILR1970Delhi126

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. B. Sen

S.N. Andley, J. (1) This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated April 24, 1969 of Rangarajan J.. whereby he dismissed the appelllants' petition (Civil Writ No. 357 of 1968) which had challenged, inter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 04 1971

R.K. Gupta Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-04-1971

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 - Rule 10

Reported in : ILR1971Delhi254

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. B. Sen

S.N. Andley, J.(1) The petitioner, R. K. Gupta, challenges the order dated August 21, 1969 passed by the President of India placing him under suspension with immediate effect from the aforesaid date. The order has placed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 1958

Pandit Banarsi Das Bhanot Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-03-1958

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 4 and 6(1)(2)

Reported in : AIR1958SC909; [1959]1SCR427; [1958]9STC388(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. B. Sen

Venkatarama Aiyar, J.1. These are appeals against the judgment of the High Court of Nagpur in writ application filed by the appellants impugning the validity of certain provisions of the Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 1963

Ghanshyam Das Vs. Regional Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Nagpur

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-16-1963

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1), 10(3), 11(2) and 11-A

Reported in : AIR1964SC766; [1964]51ITR557(SC); 1964MhLJ574(SC); [1964]4SCR436; [1963]14STC976(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. B. Sen

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeals Nos. 101 and 102 of 1961. Appeals from the order dated December 13, 1957, of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Letters Patent Appeals Nos. 208 and 207 of 1956...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 1975

Manganese Ore (India) Ltd. Vs. the Regional Assistant Commissioner of ... Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-19-1975

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 4(2) and 9

Reported in : AIR1976SC410; (1976)4SCC124; [1976]3SCR99; [1976]37STC489(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. B. Sen

S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, J.1. This is an appeal by special leave against the judgment and order of the Madhya Pradesh High Court dated April 23, 1974, dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant before...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 1975

Manganese Ore (India) Ltd. Vs. the Regional Assistant Commissioner, of ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-19-1975

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1976)5CTR(SC)303

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. B. Sen

Fazal Ali, J. - This is an appeal by special leave against the judgment and order of the Madhya Pradesh High Court dated April 23, 1974 dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant before the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 1992

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Children Book Trust

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-21-1992

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 115(4), 115(5) and 115(6); Delhi School Education Act, 1973 - Sections 4, 5, 17(3) and 18(3); Delhi School Education Rules - Rules 50, 59(2), 172, 173 and 177; Income Tax Act

Reported in : AIR1992SC1456; JT1992(3)SC19; 1992(1)SCALE851; (1992)3SCC390; [1992]2SCR535; 1992(2)LC345(SC); MANU/SC/0687/1992

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. B. Sen, Mr. G.B. Pai

Mohan, J.1. Both these appeals can be dealt with under common judgment since Use scope of Section 115(4) Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) alone arises. However, it is necessary to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 1965

ZainuddIn HossaIn Mirza and ors. Vs. Satyendra Nath Bose and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-25-1965

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 14

Reported in : AIR1966SC213; 1965(0)BLJR951

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. B. Sen, Mr. Sen

K. Subba Rao, J.1. One Kumar Pramatha Nath Roy advanced 5 loans to the predecessors-in-interest of the appellants and the opposite parties 1 to 5 before the Claims Officer on the mortgages of Khagra Estate which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial