Advanced Search Results
Nalinakhya Bysack and anr. Vs. Shyam Sundar Halder and ors.
Kolkata
Apr-09-1951
Civil
West Bengal Premises Rent Control (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1950 - Section 18 (1)
AIR1952Cal199,55CWN621
S.K. Dutt and ; Satya Priya Ghose, Advs. (in No. 1038), ; Nikhil Chandra Talukdar, Adv. (in No. 1164)
K.C. Chunder, J.1. This Rule was obtained by a landlord against an order of a Judge of the Court of Small Causes, Calcutta, granting relief to the opposite party tenant against ejectment under Section 18 (1)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBikki Singh Vs. the State of Bihar
Patna
May-25-2012
Criminal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38495 of 2011 ====================================================== Bharath Singh, son of late Basistha Singh, resident of Village- Sahunka, P.S. Ramgarh, District- Kaimur. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKariya @ Udhari Vs. the State of Bihar
Patna
May-25-2012
Criminal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38495 of 2011 ====================================================== Bharath Singh, son of late Basistha Singh, resident of Village- Sahunka, P.S. Ramgarh, District- Kaimur. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
In Re: Ram Dayal De
Kolkata
May-25-1931
Civil
AIR1932Cal1
Mitter, J.1. In this appeal Mr. Ram Dayal De, advocate applies to plead for the plaintiffs respondents without putting in a Vakalatnama for his appearance. He wants only to plead on behalf of the plaintiffs and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKhyarennessa Choudhurani and anr. Vs. Satya Bhanu Ghosal and ors.
Kolkata
Jun-12-1929
Civil
AIR1930Cal599
Mitter, J.1. In this case the appellants who were the plaintiffs below challenge the validity of the sale of a patni taluq held under Section 14, Reg. 8 of 1819. The sale took place on 19th...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSrimati Khyarennessa Choudhurani and anr. Vs. Kumar Satya Bhanu Ghosal ...
Kolkata
Jun-12-1929
Education
128Ind.Cas.188
Mitter, J.1. In this case the appellants who were the plaintiffs below challenge the validity of the sale of a putni taluk held under Section 14 of the Regulation VIII of 1819. The sale took place...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMugneeram Bangore and Co. Vs. Satyabrata Ghosh and anr.
Kolkata
Sep-06-1950
Contract
Contract Act, 1872 - Section 56
AIR1951Cal332,55CWN222
N.C. Sen Gupta and ;Arabinda Guha, Advs.
Das Gupta, J.1. The question for decision in this appeal is whether a contract for the sale-of land stood dissolved on the requisition of this land and other lands closely by the Government of West Bengal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHiralal Chakrabarti and ors. Vs. Lalit Mohan Banik and ors.
Kolkata
Aug-15-1934
Civil
163Ind.Cas.362
D.N. Mitter, J.1. This is an appeal from a judgment and decree of the Subordinate Judge, 1st Court, Faridpur, by which he reversed the judgment and decree of the Munsif of Faridpur, dated January 26, 1933....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohini Mohan Basu and ors. Vs. Rashbehari Ghose and ors.
Kolkata
Jan-07-1937
Family
AIR1937Cal229,169Ind.Cas.519
B.K. Mukherji, J.1. This is an appeal on behalf of defendants Nos. 1 to 4 who are the principal defendants in a suit commenced by the plaintiffs for declaration that a rent decree obtained by them...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTaraprasanna Ganguly and ors. Vs. Naresh Chandra Chakrabarty and ors.
Kolkata
Jan-25-1933
Civil
AIR1933Cal329
Mitter, J.1. This is an appeal on behalf of the decree-holders and is directed against an order dismissing their application for execution of a money decree obtained in their favour. The circumstances which have led to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »