Advanced Search Results

New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Harsh Mishra and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. I.C. Mishra, Mr. Arvind Kumar Patel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:29. h June, 2015 + MAC. APP. 592/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate versus HARSH MISHRA AND ORS....

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Satish Chandra Mathur

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : (2001)10SCC185

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Arvind Kumar

G.B. Pattanaik and; B.N. Agrawal, JJ.1. The Union of India is in appeal against an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench. The question for consideration is whether the services rendered by the respondent as...

Pawan Gupta Vs. Bhupinder Gupta

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Mr. Rahul Mangla, Mr. Abhishek Goyal

* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.S.A. No.89/2015 & C.M. No.3611/2015 Decided on :27. h February, 2015 PAWAN GUPTA Through: …… Appellant Mr. Varun Kumar & Mr. Pankaj Jain, Advocates. Versus BHUPINDER GUPTA...

Moonish Ahmed Vs. Halima

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Arvind Kumar

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO1122013 & CM No.3571/2013 (stay) 21st May, 2014 % MOONISH AHMED Through: ......Appellant Dr. M.Y.Khan, Adv. VERSUS HALIMA Through: ...... Respondent Mr. Arvind Kumar, Adv....

M/S Saurabh Metals Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ajay Di, Ms. Mohita, Mr. R.D. Makheeja, Mr. Arvind Kumar, Mr. C.S. Chauhan

$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6770/2015 M/S SAURABH METALS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Purti Marwaha, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr....

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi -2 vs.m/s. Bharti Ventures Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Arvind Kumar

$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA6112018 Date of decision:13. h December, 2018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI -2..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Sr. Standing Counsel Versus...

Union of India & Ors. Vs.niranjan Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Mr. Kunal Yadav, Mr. Ziya Ahmad, Ms. Neena Shukla

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 2687/2007 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. …Petitioners Through: Mr. T.P. Singh, Senior Central NIRANJAN SINGH Govt. Standing Counsel VERSUS...

Supri Advertising and Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dr. Anahita Pandole ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 308, 328, 328A and 328A(4); Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 116 and 117; Maharashtra (Urban Areas) Preservation of Trees Act, 1975; Motor Vehicles Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 142 and 226

Reported in : 2008(5)BomCR536; 2008(12)SCALE29; (2008)10SCC246; 2008AIRSCW6168; 2008(6)Supreme371; 2008(5)LH(SC)3149

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Arvind Kumar

Altamas Kabir, J.1. Leave granted in both the Special Leave Petitions.Having regard to the common issues involved in the two appeals and the connected applications, they were taken up for hearing together.2. The respondent herein, Dr....

Md. Naushad Alam. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Sections 482, 177, 281 ; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 498A, 323, 379, 406

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Adv.

The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure for the quashment of the order dated 22.03.2007 passed by the S.D.J.M., Madhupur at Deoghar in P.C.R. No. 399...

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.shahida Begum & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Arvind Kumar Pandey

$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:20. h July, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.603/2008 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. versus SHAHIDA BEGUM...