Advanced Search Results
Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record Association and Anr. Vs. Union of In ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-16-2015
MRTP
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.13 OF2015Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record - Association and another … Petitioner(s) versus Union of India … Respondent(s) With |WRIT PETITION (C) No.14 OF2015| |WRIT...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDattatraya Baburao Walawalkar and Ors. Vs. Siddhivinayak Construction ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-15-2016
Land Acquisition
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2981 OF2016(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.35188 of 2012) |DATTATRAYA BABURAO WALAWALKAR AND OTHERS |Appellant(s) | Versus |SIDDHIVINAYAK CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED |Respondent(s) | |AND OTHERS...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRegency Soraj Infrastructures Vs. Union of India and Others
Delhi
Jan-24-2012
Land Acquisition
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITON (CIVIL) NOS. 13825/2009 and 7699/2010 Reserved on: 22nd November, 2011 % Date of Decision:24th January, 2012 REGENCY SORAJ INFRASTRUCTURES ...Petitioner Through Mr. Porus...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Goyal Buitumins India Vs. Jaipur Development Authority
Rajasthan
Jan-12-2007
Arbitration
2007(1)WLN13
R.S. Chauhan, J.1. Aggrieved by the Order dt. 14.10.2005 passed by the District Judge, Jaipur City, Jaipur, two different petitions, namely, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and the Civil Writ Petition have been filed before this Court....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Kishani Devi and ors. Vs. Board of Revenue and ors.
Rajasthan
Feb-16-2010
Civil
R.S. Chauhan, J.1. Aggrieved by the order dated 12.02.2009 passed by the Board of Revenue, Ajmer ('the Board', for short) wherein the learned Board has remanded the case back to the Sub Divisional Officer, Siker ('the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Aegis Logistics Limited vs Mr. Chuna Rafi Ahmed
Karnataka
Nov-14-2024
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1799 OF 2024 (CPC) BETWEEN: M/S AEGIS LOGISTICS LIMITED HAVING ITS...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurinder Bansal Vs. M/S. Koomber Tea Company Ltd. and Another
Punjab and Haryana
Nov-20-2012
Education
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR NO.5962 OF 201.DATE OF DECISION :20. h NOVEMBER, 2012 Surinder Bansal …. Petitioner Versus M/S.Koomber Tea Company LTD.& another …. Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDhan Bahadur @ Raju Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Delhi
Feb-25-2011
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376(2)(g), 375; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Sections 313, 161, 164
Mr. Arvind Gupta, Adv.
1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No2. To be referred to Reporter or not? No3. Whether the judgment should be No reported in the Digest?1. By the judgment...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askimran Vs. State (Nct) of Delhi
Delhi
Mar-17-2011
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 394, 452, 341, 392, 397, 34; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Sections 482, 313, 315, 427
Mr. Arvind Gupta, Adv.
1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No2. To be referred to Reporter or not? No3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes1. Appellant has been...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Varun Sharma Vs. the State (Nct, Delhi) and ors.
Delhi
May-20-2011
Criminal
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5, 12; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (CRPC) - Sections 200, 156(3), 482, 397, 161; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 406, 415, 419, 420, 463, 468, 469, 471, 120-B; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 138
Mr. Arvind Gupta; Mr. Adbhut Pathak, Advs.
1. Complainant (respondent No. 2) is husband of respondent No. 3. Petitioner is brother-in-law (wife's husband) of respondent No. 2. In the month of April, 1997, respondent Nos. 2 and 3 met each other in a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »