Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr arvind gupta · Page 1 of about 12 results (0.053 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 16 2015

Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record Association and Anr. Vs. Union of In ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-16-2015

Subject : MRTP

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.13 OF2015Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record - Association and another … Petitioner(s) versus Union of India … Respondent(s) With |WRIT PETITION (C) No.14 OF2015| |WRIT...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 2016

Dattatraya Baburao Walawalkar and Ors. Vs. Siddhivinayak Construction ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-15-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2981 OF2016(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.35188 of 2012) |DATTATRAYA BABURAO WALAWALKAR AND OTHERS |Appellant(s) | Versus |SIDDHIVINAYAK CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED |Respondent(s) | |AND OTHERS...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2012

Regency Soraj Infrastructures Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-24-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITON (CIVIL) NOS. 13825/2009 and 7699/2010 Reserved on: 22nd November, 2011 % Date of Decision:24th January, 2012 REGENCY SORAJ INFRASTRUCTURES ...Petitioner Through Mr. Porus...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 12 2007

Goyal Buitumins India Vs. Jaipur Development Authority

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-12-2007

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : 2007(1)WLN13

R.S. Chauhan, J.1. Aggrieved by the Order dt. 14.10.2005 passed by the District Judge, Jaipur City, Jaipur, two different petitions, namely, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and the Civil Writ Petition have been filed before this Court....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2010

Smt. Kishani Devi and ors. Vs. Board of Revenue and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-16-2010

Subject : Civil

R.S. Chauhan, J.1. Aggrieved by the order dated 12.02.2009 passed by the Board of Revenue, Ajmer ('the Board', for short) wherein the learned Board has remanded the case back to the Sub Divisional Officer, Siker ('the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 2024

M/S Aegis Logistics Limited vs Mr. Chuna Rafi Ahmed

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-14-2024

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1799 OF 2024 (CPC) BETWEEN: M/S AEGIS LOGISTICS LIMITED HAVING ITS...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 2012

Surinder Bansal Vs. M/S. Koomber Tea Company Ltd. and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-20-2012

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR NO.5962 OF 201.DATE OF DECISION :20. h NOVEMBER, 2012 Surinder Bansal …. Petitioner Versus M/S.Koomber Tea Company LTD.& another …. Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2011

Dhan Bahadur @ Raju Vs. State of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-25-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376(2)(g), 375; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Sections 313, 161, 164

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Arvind Gupta, Adv.

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No2. To be referred to Reporter or not? No3. Whether the judgment should be No reported in the Digest?1. By the judgment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2011

imran Vs. State (Nct) of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-17-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 394, 452, 341, 392, 397, 34; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Sections 482, 313, 315, 427

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Arvind Gupta, Adv.

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No2. To be referred to Reporter or not? No3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes1. Appellant has been...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 20 2011

Shri Varun Sharma Vs. the State (Nct, Delhi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-20-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5, 12; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (CRPC) - Sections 200, 156(3), 482, 397, 161; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 406, 415, 419, 420, 463, 468, 469, 471, 120-B; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 138

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Arvind Gupta; Mr. Adbhut Pathak, Advs.

1. Complainant (respondent No. 2) is husband of respondent No. 3. Petitioner is brother-in-law (wife's husband) of respondent No. 2. In the month of April, 1997, respondent Nos. 2 and 3 met each other in a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial