Advanced Search Results

Anilkumar Phoolchand Sanghvi and Another Vs. Chandrakant P. Sanghvi an ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Anoop V. Mohta, J. 1. This is an Appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, "the Arbitration Act"), filed by the Appellants-Petitioners, thereby challenging Judgment and order dated 22 December...

Sardar Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE3D DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.579/2015 BETWEEN:1. SARDAR S/O HATIRAM JADHAV NOW AGED28YEARS, OCC: COOLIE R/O...

Sardar and Others Vs. The State through Hallikhed Police Station

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Subject : Education

(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374 (2) Cr.P.C. by the Advocate for the Appellant praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated: 18.4.2015 and sentence dated 22.4.2015,...

Punjab National Bank Thr. Its Branch Manager Vs. Shaikh Jumman Shaikh ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Banking

Acts : Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 13(1), 13(2), 13(4), 17, 18 and 34; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 69 and 69A; ;Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Acts, 1993; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 9A - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 8 - Order 9, Rule 11; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Respondent : S.Y. Deopujari, Adv.

R.K. Deshpande, J.1. This revision application is preferred by original defendant-Punjab National Bank challenging order dated 31.10.2006 passed by learned District Judge, Chandrapur setting aside order dated 15.10.2005 passed below Exh.-13 by learned 2nd Jt. Civil...

Madura Coats Limited Vs. P.C. Rathod and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(3)BomCR619; [2002(94)FLR296]; (2002)IIILLJ507Bom

Advocate for Respondent : K.P. Anilkumar and ;Ashish Oveleker, Advs.

Nishita Mhatre, J.1. The petitioner has challenged the award of the Labour Court granting respondent No. 2 reinstatement with continuity of service and 50% back-wages from July 15, 1987.It is the case of the petitioner that...

Neeta Lalit Sanghavi and Another Vs. Dharamdas Vanmalidas Sanghavi and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

1. By this petition filed under sections 9 and 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short âthe Arbitration Actâ?) the petitioners seek condonation of delay in filing the present petition and have prayed...

M/S. Hedge Finance Limited. vs Mahesh M

Court : Kerala

Subject : Arbitration

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI TUESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 27TH PHALGUNA, 1946 OP(C) NO. 2418 OF 2022 IN CMA(Arb) No.839 OF 2022 OF ADDITIONAL...

Muthoot Mini Theaters Private Limited vs Mr. Anilkumar B.

Court : Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 8TH JYAISHTA, 1946 CON.CASE(C) NO. 1205 OF 2024 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN WP(C) NO.9987...

Preeja vs Muraleedharan

Court : Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 24TH PHALGUNA, 1944 MACA NO. 777 OF 2014 AGAINST THE AWARD DATED 18.01.2012 IN...

Bholenath Trading Company Vs. State Bank of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Banking

Acts : Security Interest Act, 2002 - Rule 9

Reported in : 2006(5)BomCR207; 2006(44)MhLj37

Advocate for Respondent : Anilkumar, Adv.

D.D. Sinha, J.1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent of Mr. R.R. Srivastava, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anilkumar, learned Counsel for the Respondent.2. The counsel for the petitioner states that in the...