Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr alakh kumar · Page 1 of about 17 results (0.070 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 03 2006

Shri Nagendu Bhattacharya and ors. Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited an ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-03-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Secretariat Service Rules, 1962 - Rules 6 and 6A; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226

Reported in : 129(2006)DLT301; 2006(88)DRJ306

Advocate for Respondent : Alakh Kumar, Adv. for respondent No. 1

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. The Writ petitioners in these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seek quashing of Rule 5 of the Recruitment Rules to the post of Assistants, framed on 4.7.2003, as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2019

Steel Authority of India Limited vs.s M Lata & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-13-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 13, 2019 CRL.M.C. 4574/2017 & Crl.M.A. 18223/2017 STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. H.S.Phoolka, Senior Advocate with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2019

Steel Authority of India Limited vs.g K Lata & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-13-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 13, 2019 CRL.M.C. 4574/2017 & Crl.M.A. 18223/2017 STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. H.S.Phoolka, Senior Advocate with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 27 2004

Tata Infotech Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-27-2004

Subject : Customs

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111 and 112; Central Excise Act, 1944; Central Excise Act, 1995 - Sections 27A

Reported in : 111(2004)DLT178; 2004(74)DRJ533; 2004(94)ECC360; 2004(173)ELT8(Del)

Advocate for Respondent : Alakh Kumar, Adv.

D.K. Jain, J.1. RULE D.B.By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 seeks a direction to the respondent namely, Collector of Customs,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2003

Narinder Nath Sharma Vs. Smt. Shanit Devi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-15-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 9, Rule 13; Limitation Act - Sections 5

Reported in : 2003VIIAD(Delhi)595; 107(2003)DLT574; 2003(71)DRJ64

Advocate for Respondent : Alakh Kumar, Adv.

Manmohan Sarin, J.1. The defendant No. 3 has moved the present applications on 18th September, 2002 for setting aside the final decree passed in suit for partition dated 27th January, 1998 and for condensation of delay...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 26 2009

Orissa Oil Industries Ltd. Vs. Tribal Co-operative Marketing Developme ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-26-2009

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34

Reported in : 164(2009)DLT330

Advocate for Respondent : Alakh Kumar, Adv.

Manmohan, J.1. With consent of the parties, matter is taken up for final disposal.2. In fact, the present objection petition has been filed under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging the Award dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2017

Ratnesh Kumar vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-16-2017

Subject : MRTP

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C)1127/2017 % Reserved on :10. h February, 2017 Pronounced on:16. h March, 2017 RATNESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Abhay Kumar and Mr.Saurabh Mishra, Advocates. versus...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 25 2006

Shri Tarachand JaIn Vs. Smt. Saroj Gupta

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-25-2006

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 22, Rule 10 - Order 23, Rule 3

Reported in : 130(2006)DLT617; 2006(90)DRJ527

Advocate for Respondent : Y.K. Kapoor, Adv.

Manju Goel, J.1. This application under Section 151 CPC seeks recalling the collusive decree of 2.9.99 passed in CS(OS) 2121/1987. Before coming to the averments in the application, it is necessary to have a look at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2012

Auro Industries Limited Vs. Tribal Cooperative Marketing

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-12-2012

Subject : Arbitration

* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 12.01.2012 + FAO(OS) 212/2002 and FAO(OS) 266/2002 FAO(OS) 212/2002 AURO INDUSTRIES LIMITED ...APPELLANT VERSUS TRIBAL COOPERATIVE MARKETING DEVELOPMENT FEDERATION OF INDIA LIMITED AND...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2013

Sh. Dilip Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-27-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Alakh Kumar

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.1026/1997 % February 27, 2013 SH. DILIP SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Abhay Singh, Advocate with Ms. Yasmin Zafar, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial