Advanced Search Results

P.A.Mohammed Riyas Vs. M.K.Raghavan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 81, 100, 101, 123, 123(4), 83(1)(C); Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - Rule 94-A; Code Of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6 Rule 15(4)

ALTAMAS KABIR, J.1. The appellant herein, who contested the parliamentary elections held on 16th April, 2009 for the No.05 - Kozhikode Constituency of the Lok Sabha, challenged the election of the Respondent, Shri M.K. Raghavan, who...

B. Satyam Vs. Secretary, State Transport Authority, Andhra Pradesh, Hy ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 141 and 226; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 72(2), 80 and 104; Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1939 - Sections 2(28A), 48(3), 57, 57(8), 68C, 68D(2) and (3) and 68FF

Reported in : AIR1994AP327; 1994(2)ALT385

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R. Venugopal Reddy, Sr. Counsel and ;Mr. R. Vijayanandan Reddy, Adv.

ORDER1. These two writ petitions between the same parties relate to the same subject-matter and they can be disposed of by a common judgment.2. W.P. No. 778/94 is filed by a stage carriage operator seeking for...

Dr. Deeksha Kalra & Ors vs.guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha Universi ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mukul Talwar, Ms. Anita Sahani, Ms. Leela Suman, Mr. Shadan Farasat, Mr. Ahmed Said, Mr. Kapil Agnihotri, Mr. T. Singhdev, Mr. Tarun Verma, Ms. Puja Sarkar, Mr. Krishnan Venugopal, Mr. Akash Johri, Mr. Shivendra Singh

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h April, 2017 + W.P.(C) 2610/2017, CM No.12734/2017 DR. DEEKSHA KALRA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Angad Mehta and Mr. Dhrupad Das,...

M/S Products and Ideas India Pvt. Ltd. vs Nilkamal Limited and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Jayant Mehta, Mr. Rohit Kumar Singh, Mr. Sajid Mohammad, Mr. Hitesh Mutha, Ms. P.R. Mala, Mr. Paras Sharma, Ms. Shubhanginee Singh, Mr. Krishnan Venugopal, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Mr. Rahul Chitnis, Mr. Ankur Kashyap, Mr. Devansh Shekhar

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 23 January 2026 Pronounced on: 23 March 2026 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 111/2025, CM APPL. 41897/2025 & CM APPL. 41898/2025 M/S PRODUCTS AND IDEAS INDIA PVT....

iqbal HussaIn Vs. Mrs. P. Bharathi Bai and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 21, Rules 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104 - Order 39, Rule 1; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106

Reported in : 1998(3)ALD373; 1998(3)ALT295

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. P. Venugopal, Adv.

1. Heard both sides.2. The third party-petitioner has filed this revision aggrieved by the orders passed in E.A.No.128/93 in E.P.No. 51/92 in O.S.No. 699/90 on the file of XI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, dated...

Union of India Rep. by Chairman, Telecom Commission, New Delhi - 11000 ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Administrative Tribunals Act 1985 -- Sections 15

Reported in : 1998(2)CTC441

Advocate for Respondent : Mr, K. Venugopal, Adv.

ORDERJudgement Pronounced by D. Raju, J.1. Having regard to the fact that the main writ petition itself is concerned with the question of transfer and the legality and validity of theorder of transfer made by the...

N.S. Yamuna Vs. A. Venugopal

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 9, Rule 7 and 13 -- Order 12, Rule 7

Reported in : 2000(3)CTC724

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A. Venugopal, Adv.

ORDER1. The civil revision petition is against an order passed in I.A.No.4318 of 2000 in O.S.No.4002 of 1999 on the file of the III Assistant Judge, under Order 9, Rule 7, CPC.2. The petitioner is the...

Subba Reddy Charities Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Encroachment Act, 1905

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.M.Venugopal, Adv.

1. Petitioner/Party-in-person has filed this Writ Petition seeking for a Writ of Mandamus to remove the illegal encroachments in R.S.No.87/B of Adyar and R.S.No.90 of Velachery [present Town Survey No.36 of Alandur] and to cancel the...

I Venturs Capital Pvt. Ltd. Vs.bombay Stock Exchange

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Pratap Venugopal, Ms. Surekha Raman

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h March, 2019 % + W.P.(C) 2816/2019, CM Nos. 13100-13101/2019 I VENTURS CAPITAL PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Sr. Adv....

Bimaldeep Steel Pvt. Ltd., Adityapur, Jamshedpur Vs. the Union of Indi ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act - Sections 11(3), 11(3)(d); Forest Conservation Act; Environment Protection Act

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Khan, Mr. K. Venugopal

1. Heard the parties finally at length. 2. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 28.10.2010, passed in Revision Application File No. 06/10/2008-RC.1 by the Revisional Authority, rejecting the revision filed by...