Advanced Search Results
Shibjoy Reang Vs. State of Tripura
Guwahati
Dec-22-2000
Criminal
Arms Act - Sections 25 and 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 148, 149, 307 and 353; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 360
2001CriLJ1340
Mr. H. Sarkar, Addl. PP
1. Heard Mr. A. Ghosh, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. H. Sarkar, learned Addl. PP for the State.2. This criminal appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTapati Ghosh Vs. Sm. Parul Barick and ors.
Kolkata
Sep-15-1999
Property
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Section 11;; Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 - Sections 1, 3, 4, 4(1, 2 and 3), 5 and 8;; Indian Succession Act, 1925
(2000)2CALLT414(HC)
Mr. Indrajit Sarkar, Adv.
The Court1. Originally a suit was instituted by one Saliabala Dassi being widow of one Kalipada Barick, since deceased on 21st July, 1965 as available from the original date of verification of the Plaint. 2. Said...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaj Chowdhury Vs. Union of India and ors.
Kolkata
Jul-05-2000
ConstitutionContract
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 32, 226 and 299;; Prasar Bharti (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990 - Section 12;; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 115;; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 20
AIR2000Cal232,(2000)3CALLT376(HC)
Mr. Om Prakash Dubey, ;Mr. Shyam Sarkar and ;Mrs. Bhatia, Advs.
K.J. Sengupta. J. 1. The petitioner by this writ application has asked for the Judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution of India of the decision of respondent No.3, viz., the Director, Doordorshan Kendra, Calcutta...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shibjoy Reang Vs. State of Tripura
Guwahati
Dec-22-2000
Criminal
Arms Act - Sections 25 and 27;; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 148, 149, 307 and 353;; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 360
2001CriLJ1340
Mr. H. Sarkar, Addl. PP
1. Heard Mr. A. Ghosh, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. H. Sarkar, learned Addl. PP for the State.2. This criminal appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOwners and Parties Interested in the Vessel M.V. dong Do and anr. Vs. ...
Kolkata
Sep-30-1999
Commercial Civil
Colonial Courts of Admiralty (India) Act, 1891 - Sections 2 and 3;;Commercial Document Act;;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 114;;Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 443 and 444;;Indian Companies Act, 1956 - Section 617;;Constitution of India - Articles 1, 3, 3(4) and 10
(2000)1CALLT367(HC)
Mr. Sudipta Sarkar and ;Mr. Biswarup Gupta, Advs.
S.B. Sinha, A.C.J.1. This appeal is directed against an order dated 29th July. 1999 passed in Admiralty Suit No. 16/99. In the aforementioned Suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent, the ship known as M.V. Kim Dong was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAi Champdany Industries Limited. Vs. Blancatex A. G. and ors.
Kolkata
Mar-21-2011
Company
Companies Act - Section 397, 398, 402, 17, 163, 193, 196, 197, 399; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - order11 Rule 13, 12, 15 ; Company Law Board Regulation Rule - Rules 11, 12, 13, 124, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20. 21, 22, 23, 24; Indian Evidence Act - 65, 66
Mr. Sudipto Sarkar; Mr. Siddhartha Mitra; Ms. Mousumi Bhattacharya; Ms. Bindiya Raichura; Mr. S.K. Bajoria; Mr. S.B. Mookherjee; Mr. S.N. Mookherjee; Mr. Debangsu Basak; Mr. Abhijit Guha Roy; Mrs. Neeina Chatterjee, Advs.
1. Two appeals and two cross appeals were heard by me. They were against the order dated 17th May, 2010 passed by the Company Law Board, Kolkata Bench. The order was passed in each of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmitava Nath and anr. Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India Ltd.
Kolkata
Aug-18-2010
Education
Mr. Alok Banerjee ; Mr. A.Sarkar, Advs.
GA No. 2439 of 2010 G.A.2615 of 2010 APOT 430 of 2010 W.P.1352 of 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Original Side AMITAVA NATH & ANR. Appellants Versus LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Sec. andors Vs. K. Balu and Anr.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-31-2017
Land Acquisition
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION I A Nos 4-6, 7-9, 10-12, 13-15, 16-18, 19-21, 22-24, 25-27, 28-30, 31- 33, 34-36, 37-39, 40-42 IN CIVIL APPEAL NOS1216412166 OF2016THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP.BY...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeo Kumar Ghatak vs Union of India & Ors.
Delhi
May-19-2026
MRTP
$~28, 27, 29 to 65* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 19th May, 2026 Uploaded on: 25th May, 2026 + W.P.(C) 5699/2025 MRITYUNJAY KUMAR .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 4619/2025 ARUN KUMAR SAXENA...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarendrakant G Gite vs Union of India & Ors.
Delhi
May-19-2026
Right to Information
$~28, 27, 29 to 65* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 19th May, 2026 Uploaded on: 25th May, 2026+ W.P.(C) 5699/2025 MRITYUNJAY KUMAR .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 4619/2025 ARUN KUMAR SAXENA .....Petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »