Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr a d maru · Page 1 of about 6 results (0.147 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 13 2001

Commissioner of Customs and Vs. Saibaba Ship Breaking

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-13-2001

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2003)(90)ECC447

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A.D. Maru, Mr. M.C. Dhruve

1. The respondents to these applications, except Chaudhry Industries, are represented before us by counsels. After hearing parties on the stay applications filed by the department we have, with their consent, decided to take up the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2009

Pravinkumar Paraskumar Gokhroo Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-27-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7 and 13; Constitution of India - Article 311(2); Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 - Rule 19; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 389(1)

Reported in : 2010CriLJ477

Advocate for Respondent : Trusha Patel, A.P.P and; Y.N. Ravani, Adv.

D.H. Waghela, J.1. The petitioner has prayed for suspension of his conviction under Sections 7 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 pursuant to admission of his appeal and the sentence also having been...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2005

J.M. Industries Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-29-2005

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962; Customs Tariff Act, 1975

Reported in : 2005(187)ELT291(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : Jitendra Malkan, Adv. for Respondent No. 1

D.A. Mehta, J.1. Heard Mr.A.D.Maru, learned advocate for the appellant. None appears when the matter is taken up for hearing. Taking into consideration the nature of the controversy between the parties the appeal is taken up...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 25 2002

Shree Ram Food Industries Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-25-2002

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B and 11B(1); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Sections 233B; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002LC547(Gujarat); 2003(152)ELT285(Guj); (2003)4GLR544

Advocate for Respondent : Mukesh R. Shah, Adv.

K.A. Puj, J. 1. The petitioner/ in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India/ has prayed for quashing and setting aside of the impugned order dated 18-4-2000 passed by the Commissioner of Central...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2006

Crown Steel Company Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-29-2006

Subject : Customs

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(202)ELT420(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : Y.N. Ravani, CGSC

J.M. Panchal, J.1. Rule. Mr. Y.N. Ravani, learned Central Government Standing Counsel, waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. Having regard to the facts of the case, the petition is heard today.2. By means...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 1993

Mrs. Malini Ramnath Rele Vs. Third Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-08-1993

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1994)49ITD43(Mum.)

1. By this appeal, the assessee has challenged the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) dated November 6, 1986, for the assessment year 1985-86.2. The arguments of learned counsel for the assessee and the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial