Advanced Search Results

The State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Ram Kishun and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 109, 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323 and 326; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 374 and 428

Reported in : AIR1976SC2016; 1976CriLJ1559; (1976)3SCC449; [1976]3SCR379

Advocate for Respondent : Shiv Pujan Singh, Adv.

P.K. Goswami, J.1. This appeal by special leave at the instance of the State of Uttar Pradesh is against the judgment of acquittal of the High Court of Allahabad.2. Balram, Ram Khelawan and Khuddi are three...

Vikas Pathania Vs. U.S.i.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 1996RLR443

Jaspal Singh, J. (1) There are certain rules for eligibility for entrance exams. for admission to MBBS/BDS course. The essential qualifications for general category are : 'B.ESSENTIAL Qualifications For General Category : Candidates who have appeared/passed...

Jagannath and ors Vs. Laxmi Auto Agency

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1 Rule 10

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Mamta Tandon; Mr. V.K. Tandon, Advs.

1. The five petitioners workmen by this petition impugn the award dated 5th April, 2008 of the Industrial Adjudicator on the following reference:"Whether the services of workmen whose names appear in Annexure „A have been terminated...

Pran Nath Lekhi and anr. Vs. Rajiv Gandhi Foundation and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Trust Act, 1882 - Sections 20

Reported in : 1998VAD(Delhi)181; AIR1999Delhi40; 1999(48)DRJ775

ORDERS.K. Mahajan, J.1. The plaintiffs claiming themselves to be interested in the Trust known as Rajiv Gandhi Foundation have filed this application seeking leave of the court to institute the suit for a declaration that there...

Devilal and ors. Vs. Kishanlal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Acts : Rajasthan Pre-emption Act, 1966 - Sections 5, 8 and 16

Reported in : RLW2006(3)Raj2214; 2006(3)WLC61

Advocate for Respondent : Rajat Dave, Adv. for; M.S. Singhvi, Adv.

Prakash Tatia, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. The appellants are aggrieved against the dismissal of the suit seeking decree for pre-emption by the trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 4.12.1978 and dismissal of...

Purshottam Dass Tandon and ors. Vs. State of U.P. Lucknow and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105; Government Grants Act, 1895 - Sections 3; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : AIR1987All56

Advocate for Respondent : Standing Counsel

R.M. Sahai, J.1. Renewal of Nazul land leases of Civil Lines, Allahabad, sprawled over an area of approximately 662 acres, one of the poshest localities of the town, renowned for its quiet serenity, famous for its,...

Committee of Management, D.A.V. Inter College, Aligarh and Another Vs. ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services Commission and Selection Boards Act, 1982 - Sections 21; Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services Commission (Procedure for Approval of Punishment) Regulations, 1985 - Regulations 5, 7, 8, 35, 36, 37 and 44; Uttar Pradesh High Schools and Intermediate Colleges (Payment of Salary to Teachers and other Employees) Act, 1971 - Sections 10 (1) and (2); Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Sections 16G (3) and (5); Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Service Commission (Procedure and Conduct of Business) Regulations, 1983 - Regulation 5

Reported in : 1998(2)AWC1556; (1998)2UPLBEC1532

Advocate for Respondent : S.C., ;A.K. Yadav and ;R.N. Singh, Advs.

O. P. Garg, J.1. This petition is a glaring instance of the litigative zeal which is permeating the educational sphere. To what extent a Principal appointed on permanent basis after due selection and recommendation having been...

Bhanu Pratap Singh and ors. Vs. Chief Revenue Officer/Deputy Director, ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 22, Rules 1 and 2; ;Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holding Act, 1953 - Sections 48

Reported in : 2003(4)AWC2722

Advocate for Respondent : Swaraj Prakash, Adv. and ;S.C.

Janardan Sahai, J.1. Mahadeo Singh and Kalika Singh were brothers. The petitioners Bhanu Pratap Singh, Sarvesh Kumar Singh and Nirvesh Kumar Singh in Writ Petition No. 31102 of 2000 are descendants of Mahadeo Singh. The contesting...

Tatya Lagamanna Desai and ors. Vs. Yogabai

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 52 - Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 22, Rule 10 - Order 34, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1962Bom191; (1961)63BOMLR975; ILR1961Bom977

Advocate for Respondent : M.V. Paranjape and ;V.V. Divekar, Advs.

(1) Survey No. 110 situate at Takli originally belonged to one Girgouda Rayagonda Patil. On 5-3-1924,. Girgouda executed a simple mortgage in respect of the said land in favour of one Appaji Payangonda Patil. Appaji Payangonda...

Shailendra Kumar Shukla (Dr.) Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh State Medical Colleges Teachers, Service Rules, 1990 - Rule 15; Uttar Pradesh Selection in consultation with Public Service Commission (Procedure) Rules, 1970

Reported in : (2003)2UPLBEC1136

Advocate for Respondent : U.N. Sharma, ;S.C.

M. Katju , J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel.2. In this writ petition on 22.2.2001 learned Standing Counsel was granted one month's time to file counter-affidavit. Thereafter on 1.5.2001...