Advanced Search Results

Mohan Construction Co. Vs. Dda

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30

Reported in : 2005(2)ARBLR486(Delhi); 2005(82)DRJ400

Advocate for Respondent : Monica Sharma, Adv.

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. Present order disposes of objections filed by DDA under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 to the award dated 6.10.1995 made and published by Sh. A.C. Panchdhari, the sole arbitrator appointed to...

Delhi Tamil Education Association Vs. Directorate of Education

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Delhi School Education Act, 1973 - Sections 96 and 98; University Grants Commission Act, 1956; Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 - Rules 96, 96(3A), 98(2), 98(3) and 98(4)

Reported in : 153(2008)DLT261

Advocate for Respondent : Monica Sharma, Adv.

S.N. Aggarwal, J. 1. Delhi Tamil Education Association (hereinafter to be referred as the 'Petitioner') is a linguistic minority registered society. The said society has established seven educational institutions for imparting education from Class I to...

Engineering Development Corporation vs.north Municipal Corporation of ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: August 23, 2017 $~OS-3 * % + ARB.P. 778/2016 and IA No.15280/2016 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION........ Petitioner Through Ms.Monica Sharma, Adv. versus NORTH MUNICIPAL CORPORATION...

S. Surjit Singh Sahani vs.state & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

16 $~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST.CAS. 27/2018 & I.A. 6245/2018 S. SURJIT SINGH SAHANI ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Monica Sharma, Advocate. versus STATE & ANR Through None. ............

Kishan Lal Sindhi Vs. the Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000IVAD(Delhi)142

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ansuya Salwan and ; Ms. Monica Sharma, Advs.

ORDERDr. M.K. Sharma, J.1. The present writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner for issuance of a writ of mandamus to the respondents directing them to allot to the petitioner a flat at Vasant Kunj...

S.S. Jetley Vs. Dda and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11(6)

Reported in : 1999(3)ARBLR389(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Monica Sharma, Adv.

ORDERVikramajit Sen, J.1. This is an Arbitration Application filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It has been averred that on the arising of the disputes between the parties, the Arbitration Clause...

Dinesh Kumar Sharma Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contempt of Court

Reported in : 111(2004)DLT526; 2004(75)DRJ296

Advocate for Respondent : Anusuya Salwan and ; Monica Sharma, Advs., for respondents No.1 to 3, ;

Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.1. The petitioner has filed the contempt petition alleging violation of the order dated 21.1.2003 in Civil Writ Petition 6455/1999. 2. The petitioner had been allocated a Category III flat on the ground...

Subhash Chandra Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999VAD(Delhi)277A

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Monica Sharma, Adv.

ORDERDr. M.K. Sharma, J.1. The present writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus against the respondent quashing the demand raised by the respondent under letter dated 26th...

Anurodh Constructions Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ArbitrationCivil

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30 and 33; Contract Act - Sections 73

Reported in : 2005(84)DRJ314

Advocate for Respondent : Monica Sharma, Adv.

Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.IA No. 3236/1998 IN CS (OS) No. 693A/1995This is an application for issuance of notice for filing of the Award, which has also become infructuous and is, thus, disposed of.IA No. 5430/1998 IN...

Abdul Sattar and anr. Vs. Dda and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : 2003(67)DRJ165

Advocate for Respondent : Monica Sharma, Adv. for R-1 and 2 and ; G.K. Srivastava, Adv. for R-3

Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. 1. The petitioners claim to have been residents of Sarai Khalil from where they were removed in May 1976 for purpose of beatification of the city. The petitioner are aggrieved by the...