Advanced Search Results
Ganpatrai Agarwall Vs. the Fertiliser Corporation of India
Kolkata
Jun-27-1983
Contract
Contract Act, 1872 - Section 28; ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 31 and 31(4); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 20
AIR1984Cal35
Milan Banerjee and ;Umesh Banerjee, Advs.
Pratibha Bonnerjea, J.1. The long history of this case is as follows:--The petitioner entered into a contract with the respondent for purchase of abandoned fertiliser plants for Rupees 40,02,500/- on 'as is where is'' basis pursuant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Anupam Ghosh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Kolkata
Aug-31-1990
ConstitutionService
Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226
(1991)1CALLT300(HC)
Milan Banerjee, Solicitor General of India and ;Tapan Kumar Roy, Adv.
Ganendra Narayan Ray, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 10.8,87 passed by Mr. Justice Umesh Chandra Banerjee in C.O. No. 11155(W) of 1986. By the aforesaid judgment, the learned trial Judge dismissed the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSingh and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
May-22-2003
CivilConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 15; Uttar Pradesh Minor Mineral (Concession) Rules, 1963 - Rule 27
AIR2003All375
S.C. Misra, ;Prakash Dwivedi, ;Somesh Khare, ;Milan Banerjee and ;Vikram Nath, Advs. and ;Arvind Kumar Srivastava, S.C.
Vineet Saran, J.1. By the consent of the parties, this writ application was treated on the list of 10-4-2003. Arguments were heard and judgment reserved.2. In this writ application, we have heard Sri W.H. Khan, learned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and ors. Vs. Jharna Sarkar and ors.
Kolkata
Feb-10-2004
Civil
Life Insurance Corporation (Modification of Settlement) Act
(2004)2CALLT433(HC),2004(2)CHN606
Milan Banerjee, ;S. Sarkar and ;R. Agarwal, Advs.
Ashim Kumar Banerjee, J.1. Indian Oil Corporation Limited the appellant abovenamed is one of the oil companies empowered to deal with kerosene oil. Under the kerosene oil Control Order the oil companies are to appoint agents...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssn. of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) a ...
Delhi
Apr-24-2003
Civil
Constitution of India - Articles 12, 21, 32, 226; Cinematograph Act - Sections 12; Delhi Cinematograph Rules, 1953 - Rules 3, 3(3), 23 and 47; Delhi Cinematograph (Amendment) Rules 1981; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161; Indian Electricity Act; Indian Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rules 32, 33, 36, 41, 42, 43, 50A, 51, 61A, 62(2), 63, 64, 64(2), 64A, 64A(2), 65 to 69; Delhi Fire (Prevention and Safety) Act, 1986; Delhi Fire (Prevention and Safety) Rules, 1987; Civil Law
II(2003)ACC114; 2003ACJ1631; 2003IIIAD(Delhi)321; 104(2003)DLT234; 2003(68)DRJ128; 2003RLR333
Naveen Chawla, Adv. for Respondent No.1, ; Yashuwant Das, Sr. Adv. and ;
ORDER'. The film had a patriotic fervor and was based on the 1971 Indo-Pak war. During the matinee show of the film, immediately after the interval, the audience in the cinema hall saw smoke coming out...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJagdish Ch. Patnaik and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-07-1998
Service
Orissa Service of Engineers Rules, 1941 - Rules 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 to 15, 16 to 18 and 26; Constitution of India - Article 16; Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 - Sections 22; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 19 - Order 47, Rule 1
1998IIIAD(SC)702; AIR1998SC1926; JT1998(3)SC105; 1998(2)SCALE662; (1998)4SCC456; [1998]2SCR676
G.B. Pattanaik, J.1. Leave granted in SLP No. 7017 of 1998.2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 25.10.1994 of the Orissa Administrative Tribunal in Misc. Petition No 3229 of 1992, arising out of Original...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWest Bengal State Electricity Board Vs. Bongaon Electric Supply Co. Lt ...
Kolkata
Jul-03-1974
Electricity
Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 5(1) and 7
AIR1975Cal137
Sankardas Banerje, ;Milan Kumar Banerjee and ;Pashupati Nath Chundar, Advs.
Laik, J. 1. It is, I think, vital in an appeal of this kind marked at the beginning in dead earnest to attempt to escape from any tendency to compartmental acts, for the purposes of relevance....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOswal Agro Furane Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Mar-31-1992
Customs
1992(39)ECC126
Mr. Sapra
Sat Pal, J.1. In this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the amendment dated 14th October, 1991 to the Export (Control) Order, 1988 issued by the Ministry of Commerce, Office of the Chief Controller of Imports...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndia Glycols Limited Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Apr-03-2000
Constitution
Uttar Pradesh Excise Rules - Rule 3; Indian Companies Act, 1956; Uttar Pradesh Excise Act, 1910 - Sections 41; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 106
2000(2)AWC1635
C.S. Singh, Adv. and ;C.S.
M. Katju and D. R. Chaudhary,JJ. 1. Heard Shri Milan Banerjee, Senior Advocate. Shri Bharat Ji Agarwal and Shri Piyush Agrawal for the petitioner, and the learned Chief Standing Counsel and Shri C. S. Singh for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askindofer Society and ors. Vs. Director General of Foreign Trade and ors ...
Kolkata
Jan-19-2001
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21 and 226;; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order I, Rule 10 - Order 6, Rules 17 and 53;; Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 - Section 5
(2001)2CALLT257(HC),2001(134)ELT356(Cal)
K.J. Sengupta, J.1. After completion of filing of affidavits for final hearing of the writ petition and in fact after the writ petition itself was being heard for two days this application has been taken out...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »