Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: milan banerjee · Page 1 of about 12 results (0.041 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 27 1983

Ganpatrai Agarwall Vs. the Fertiliser Corporation of India

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-27-1983

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Section 28; ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 31 and 31(4); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 20

Reported in : AIR1984Cal35

Advocate for Respondent : Milan Banerjee and ;Umesh Banerjee, Advs.

Pratibha Bonnerjea, J.1. The long history of this case is as follows:--The petitioner entered into a contract with the respondent for purchase of abandoned fertiliser plants for Rupees 40,02,500/- on 'as is where is'' basis pursuant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 1990

Sri Anupam Ghosh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-31-1990

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226

Reported in : (1991)1CALLT300(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Milan Banerjee, Solicitor General of India and ;Tapan Kumar Roy, Adv.

Ganendra Narayan Ray, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 10.8,87 passed by Mr. Justice Umesh Chandra Banerjee in C.O. No. 11155(W) of 1986. By the aforesaid judgment, the learned trial Judge dismissed the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 2003

Singh and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-22-2003

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 15; Uttar Pradesh Minor Mineral (Concession) Rules, 1963 - Rule 27

Reported in : AIR2003All375

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Misra, ;Prakash Dwivedi, ;Somesh Khare, ;Milan Banerjee and ;Vikram Nath, Advs. and ;Arvind Kumar Srivastava, S.C.

Vineet Saran, J.1. By the consent of the parties, this writ application was treated on the list of 10-4-2003. Arguments were heard and judgment reserved.2. In this writ application, we have heard Sri W.H. Khan, learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 10 2004

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and ors. Vs. Jharna Sarkar and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-10-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Life Insurance Corporation (Modification of Settlement) Act

Reported in : (2004)2CALLT433(HC),2004(2)CHN606

Advocate for Respondent : Milan Banerjee, ;S. Sarkar and ;R. Agarwal, Advs.

Ashim Kumar Banerjee, J.1. Indian Oil Corporation Limited the appellant abovenamed is one of the oil companies empowered to deal with kerosene oil. Under the kerosene oil Control Order the oil companies are to appoint agents...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2003

Assn. of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) a ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-24-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 21, 32, 226; Cinematograph Act - Sections 12; Delhi Cinematograph Rules, 1953 - Rules 3, 3(3), 23 and 47; Delhi Cinematograph (Amendment) Rules 1981; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161; Indian Electricity Act; Indian Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rules 32, 33, 36, 41, 42, 43, 50A, 51, 61A, 62(2), 63, 64, 64(2), 64A, 64A(2), 65 to 69; Delhi Fire (Prevention and Safety) Act, 1986; Delhi Fire (Prevention and Safety) Rules, 1987; Civil Law

Reported in : II(2003)ACC114; 2003ACJ1631; 2003IIIAD(Delhi)321; 104(2003)DLT234; 2003(68)DRJ128; 2003RLR333

Advocate for Respondent : Naveen Chawla, Adv. for Respondent No.1, ; Yashuwant Das, Sr. Adv. and ;

ORDER'. The film had a patriotic fervor and was based on the 1971 Indo-Pak war. During the matinee show of the film, immediately after the interval, the audience in the cinema hall saw smoke coming out...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 1998

Jagdish Ch. Patnaik and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-07-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Orissa Service of Engineers Rules, 1941 - Rules 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 to 15, 16 to 18 and 26; Constitution of India - Article 16; Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 - Sections 22; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 19 - Order 47, Rule 1

Reported in : 1998IIIAD(SC)702; AIR1998SC1926; JT1998(3)SC105; 1998(2)SCALE662; (1998)4SCC456; [1998]2SCR676

G.B. Pattanaik, J.1. Leave granted in SLP No. 7017 of 1998.2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 25.10.1994 of the Orissa Administrative Tribunal in Misc. Petition No 3229 of 1992, arising out of Original...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 1974

West Bengal State Electricity Board Vs. Bongaon Electric Supply Co. Lt ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-03-1974

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 5(1) and 7

Reported in : AIR1975Cal137

Advocate for Respondent : Sankardas Banerje, ;Milan Kumar Banerjee and ;Pashupati Nath Chundar, Advs.

Laik, J. 1. It is, I think, vital in an appeal of this kind marked at the beginning in dead earnest to attempt to escape from any tendency to compartmental acts, for the purposes of relevance....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 1992

Oswal Agro Furane Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-31-1992

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1992(39)ECC126

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sapra

Sat Pal, J.1. In this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the amendment dated 14th October, 1991 to the Export (Control) Order, 1988 issued by the Ministry of Commerce, Office of the Chief Controller of Imports...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 2000

India Glycols Limited Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-03-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Excise Rules - Rule 3; Indian Companies Act, 1956; Uttar Pradesh Excise Act, 1910 - Sections 41; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 106

Reported in : 2000(2)AWC1635

Advocate for Respondent : C.S. Singh, Adv. and ;C.S.

M. Katju and D. R. Chaudhary,JJ. 1. Heard Shri Milan Banerjee, Senior Advocate. Shri Bharat Ji Agarwal and Shri Piyush Agrawal for the petitioner, and the learned Chief Standing Counsel and Shri C. S. Singh for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2001

indofer Society and ors. Vs. Director General of Foreign Trade and ors ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-19-2001

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21 and 226;; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order I, Rule 10 - Order 6, Rules 17 and 53;; Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 - Section 5

Reported in : (2001)2CALLT257(HC),2001(134)ELT356(Cal)

K.J. Sengupta, J.1. After completion of filing of affidavits for final hearing of the writ petition and in fact after the writ petition itself was being heard for two days this application has been taken out...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial