Advanced Search Results

Cadila Healthcare Ltd. Vs. Swiss Pharma Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 27, 29 and 30; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96

Reported in : (2002)2GLR1734

Advocate for Respondent : P.M. Thakkar, Sr. Adv. and; Y.J. Trivedi, Adv.

D.P. Buch, J.1. Whether 'SUPERDAC' medicine manufactured, marketed and sold by the respondent herein contains a mark which is deceptively similar or identical with the mark 'SPARDAC', a product of the appellant, is a question at...

Ramgopal Polytex Ltd. Vs. Stone on Net India Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 3

Reported in : (2009)2GLR1477

Advocate for Respondent : Mihir Thakore and; C.H. Vora, Advs. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2

M.R. Shah, J.1. Rule. Shri C.H. Vora, learned Advocate waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No. 1-original plaintiff.2. Shri Mihir Joshi, learned Senior Advocate seeks permission to delete respondent No. 2 so far as...

Rajeev Indravadan Modi and ors. Vs. Instance Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. an ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 6, Rule 1 - Order 7, Rule 6A - Order 8, Rule 6A and 6B - Order XXXIX; Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 64, 104, 105, 107, 108 and 116; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34

Reported in : (2001)3GLR2010

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Shelat and; Mihir Thakore, Sr. Counsel for Singhi & Co.

A.L. Dave, J. 1. This is a revision application preferred by the revisioners, who are the original plaintiffs in Civil Suit No. 11 of 2000 pending in District Court, at Vadodara. That suit is preferred by...

Rasiklal S. Mardia Vs. O.L. of Mardia Chemicals Limited and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : CompanyCivil

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 446 and 457; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 11

Reported in : [2008]147CompCas31(Guj); [2010]97SCL221(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : Amee Yajnik, Adv. for Official Liquidator,; Mihir Thakore, Sr. Adv. and;

K.A. Puj, J.1. The applicant has taken out this Judge's Summons praying for the following directions and/or orders from this Court:YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to permit me to represent in all legal cases filed by...

Mayooriben J. Thakore Vs. Gujarat Agro Industries

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Service

Acts : Gujarat Agro-Industries Corporation Limited Service Rules, 1969 - Rules 16, 19, 21 and 30

Reported in : [2005(104)FLR8]; (2004)2GLR1707

Advocate for Respondent : Mihir Thakore, Sr. Adv. and; P.J. Davawala, Adv.

Ravi R. Tripathi, J.1. This petition was heard finally and disposed of by the learned single Judge (Mr. Justice C.K. Thakkar, as he then was). Being aggrieved of that, the respondents had filed Letters Patent Appeal...

Babul Products Private Ltd. Vs. Zen Products

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCivil

Acts : Sales Tax Act; Central Excise Act; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9; Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 2 (47), 47, 43 and 53; Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 2, 2(1), 6(1), 12, 20, 21, 24, 24(1), 24(2), 28(2), 29, 35, 48(2), 49, 49(1), 49(2), 52, 53, 59(2) and 73; Trade Marks Rules, 2002 - Rules 82 to 83, 84; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 12(3), 23, 27, 29 and 131; Delhi Rent Control Act; Income Tax Act; Partnership Act, 1890 - Sections 23, 38, 43 and 53; Copyright Act - Sections 19(2), 30, 30A and 54; Contract Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9, 15, 25, 33, 37 and 41 - Order 2

Reported in : (2005)3GLR2309; 2005(31)PTC135(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : Mihir Thakore,; S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advs.,; Sandeep Singh

ORDERAt this stage Mr. Mihir Joshi, Senior Advocate for the appellant requested that the interim relief may be extended for a period of four weeks. Mr. Mihir Thakore, Senior Advocate for the respondent has objected to...

Rainbow Dyestuff Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37

Reported in : [1995]213ITR560(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : Mihir Thakore, Adv.

Susanta Chatterji, J.1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench 'C' (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal'), at the instance of the assessee has referred the following questions for the opinion of the High Court : 'Whether,...

Roopali Dyeing and Printing Works Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143(3), 155, 156, 220(2), 250, 254, 260, 262 and 264

Reported in : (1994)122CTR(Guj)234; [1995]212ITR573(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : Mihir Thakore, Adv.

Susanta Chatterji, J. 1. This special civil application has been filed at the instance of the petitioner-assessee, praying, inter alia, for a writ of certiorari quashing the decision of the respondent-Department calling upon the petitioner-assessee to...

Ringspann Elecon (India) Limited and anr. Vs. Ringspann Gmbh.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act - Section 9, 37(1)(a), Company Act - Article 15; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Rule 3 Order 39; Provisions of Specific Relief Act - Section 14(1)(e).

Advocate for Respondent : MR MIHIR THAKORE; MR UTKARSH B JANI, Advs.

1. The appellants, original opponent Nos.1 and 2 in Civil Misc. Application No.38 of 2010 filed by the present respondent-original applicant in the Court of District and Sessions Judge, Anand under Section 9 of the Arbitration...

iqbalbhai Ibrahimbhai Arandia Vs. Satwara Valji Nathu and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227

Advocate for Respondent : MR. MIHIR THAKORE; MR. V.H. KANARA, Advs.

1. By way of this petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner - third party has prayed for an appropriate order to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 01/11/2006 passed...