Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mihir joshi · Page 1 of about 112 results (0.034 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 06 2000

Shankerlal Nebhumal Uttamchandani Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-06-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 1998 - Sections 87 and 88; Constitution of India - Article 226; Income-tax Act - Sections 143(3)

Reported in : [2001]251ITR876(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : Manish R. Bhatt, Adv.

M.S. Shah, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution by an individual who was a partner in the firm called City Construction ('the firm'), for refund of income-tax paid by the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 2009

Cadila Healthcare Ltd. Vs. Gujarat Co-operative Milk Marketing Federat ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-08-2009

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 2004 - Sections 5 and 7; Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 9, 19, 29, 30 and 35; Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rule - Rule 47

Reported in : 2009(41)PTC336(Del)

Advocate for Respondent : Mihir Joshi, Sr. Adv., ; Arvind Nigam, ; Pranit Nanavat

Mukul Mudgal, J.1. The present appeal arises from the judgment/ order dated 23rd October, 2007 in CS (OS) No. 605/2007 titled as Cadila Healthcare Ltd. v. Gujarat Co-operative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd. and Ors. wherein according...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 16 2008

Maruti Minerals and Metals Vs. the Govt. of India and 4 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-16-2008

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulations) Act, 1957 - Sections 1A, 2, 4, 4(3), 5, 5(A), 5(1), 5(2), 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 17A, 17A(1), 17A(1A), 17A(2) and 18; Mineral Concessions Rules, 1960 - Rule 59; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 10 and 13; Gujarat Mining Minerals Rules, 1966 - Rule 11(4); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1) and 226

Reported in : (2008)3GLR2262

Advocate for Respondent : D.C. Sejpal, Adv. for Respondent 1,; Mihir Joshi, AGG and;

ORDERAnant S. Dave, J.1. Rule. Mr. D.C. Sejpal, learned Central Government Counsel, Mr. Satyam Chhaya, learned AGP and learned Counsel Mr. Dipen C. Shah, waive service of notice of Rule for respective respondents.2. All these writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 18 2005

Birla Vxl Limited

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-18-2005

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391, 391(1), 393 and 394; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 69 and 79

Reported in : [2006]66SCL69(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : Mihir Joshi and; Devang Nanavati, Advs. for Nanavati & Nananavati Associates for Exim Bank

K.A. Puj, J.1. The applicant, namely, Birla VXL Limited has taken out this Judge's Summons praying for direction for convening the meeting of Unsecured Creditors of OCM Division of the applicant Company, being transferred to OCM...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 2001

Garden Finance Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-06-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 49, 49(2) and 147

Reported in : (2003)180CTR(Guj)145

Advocate for Respondent : Mihir Joshi and; Manish R. Bhatt, Advs.

M.S. Shah, J. 1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner-company, which is engaged in the business of financing and trading in shares, has challenged the notice dated May 28, 2001 (annexure...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 1997

Madhubhai Bhikhabhai Mina Vs. Tax Recovery Officer

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-04-1997

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 222

Reported in : [1998]231ITR634(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : Mihir Joshi, Adv. for M.R. Bhatt & Co.

R.K. Abichandani, J.1. Rule. Learned counsel Mr. Mihir Joshi for M/s M. R. Bhatt & Co. waives service of rule. 2. At the instance of both the sides, the matter is being finally disposed of. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2005

Essar Steel Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-28-2005

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 78, 80, 87, 100, 101, 101(2), 102(2), 102(3), 103, 104, 106, 107, 192A, 391 and 642(1)

Reported in : [2006]130CompCas123(Guj); (2006)5CompLJ83(Guj); [2005]59SCL457(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : Sandeep Singhi, Adv. for Singhi & Co.,; Mihir Joshi, Sr. Adv. and;

K.A. Puj, J.1. The petitioner, namely, Essar Steel Limited has filed this petition under Section 78 and 100 to 103 of the Companies Act, 1956 before this Court seeking following prayers :-(a) That the reduction of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 27 2000

Rushil Industries Ltd. Vs. Harsh Prakash

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-27-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 132, 132A, 142(1), 158B, 158BC and 158BD; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2001)166CTR(Guj)300; [2001]251ITR608(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : Mihir Joshi, Adv. for; Manish R. Bhatt, Adv.

D.M. Dharmadhikari, C.J. 1. After hearing learned counsel, rule is issued, Learned counsel for the Department waives service of rule. Learned counsel for both the parties are finally heard. 2. The petitioner, by way of this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 26 2001

Sagar Enterprises Vs. Assistant Commissioner

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-26-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147

Reported in : [2002]257ITR335(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : Mihir Joshi, Adv. for; Manish R. Bhatt, Adv.

D.A. Mehta J.1. The petitioner, a partnership firm, has challenged in this petition a notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter to be referred to as 'the Act'), issued on October 3, 1997,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 2005

Rameshchandra Bansal Through Constituted Attorney Virendra Bansal Vs. ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-11-2005

Subject : CompanyCivil

Acts : Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 - Sections 3, 11(1), 11(2), 12 and 30; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 226; Central Excise Act; General Clauses Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Stock-broker and Sub-brokers) Regulations, 1992 - Regulation 10; Securities and Exchange Board of India Rules - Rule 8

Reported in : (2006)2CompLJ93(Guj); (2005)3GLR2734; [2006]67SCL404(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : Mihir Joshi, Sr. Adv.,; Bijal Chhatrapati and; Jay Amin

D.N. Patel, J.1. Rule. Learned Counsels for the Respondents waive service of Rule on behalf of their Respondents.2. In all the above petitions, the common question of law is involved and hence all the matters are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial