Advanced Search Results

M.M.T.C. Ltd. Vs. Trimurtee Fertilizers Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11(4)

Reported in : 1998(45)DRJ21

Vijender Jain, J. (1) It has been contended by Mr.Sanat Kumar, counsel for the applicant that the respondent failed to appoint an Arbitrator after expiry of 30 days from the receipt of the request from the...

State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Scene Screen (Pvt.) Ltd., and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : TenancyProperty

Acts : Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885 - Sections 3; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 10, 23 and 24; West Bengal Estates' Acquisition Act, 1953 - Sections 2, 4, 5, 6, 6(1) and 39

Reported in : AIR2000SC3089; 2000(6)SCALE607; (2000)7SCC686; [2000]Supp3SCR502

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Manoj Chatterjee

D.P. Mohapatra, J.1. State of West Bengal represented by the Secretary Land and Land Reforms Department, the Junior Land Reforms Officer, Barrackpore Circle, P.S. Khardah, Distt. 24 Parganas and the Additional Collector and Additional District Magistrate...

Shri Shanker Prashad Mukerji Vs. Union OfIndia and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, Mr. Girish Panda, Mr. Rajiv Kapur, Ms. Vatsala Rai

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.7835/2012 12th September, 2013 % SHRI SHANKER PRASHAD MUKERJI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Chatterjee, Advocate with Ms. K. Iyer, Advocate and Mr. Basab...

Taposh Chatterjee vs.madhulika Chatterjee

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:28. 07.2017 CS(OS) 2970/2012 ..... Plaintiff ..... Defendant TAPOSH CHATTERJEE versus MADHULIKA CHATTERJEE Advocates who appeared in this case: For the...

Prem Kumar Vs. Secy. (Labour), Goi, M/O Labour and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10, 10(1), 25F, 25G and 25H

Reported in : 117(2005)DLT712; [2005(105)FLR816]; (2005)IILLJ443Del; 2006(1)SLJ199(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : Manoj Chatterjee, Adv. for respondent No. 2/CSIR

Mukul Mudgal, J.1. As per the Registrar's Order dated 12th April, 2004, respondent No.1/UOI has been duly served and no one appears for it. There is no representation on behalf of the respondent No.1/UOI in Court...

Subhash and Co. Vs. Kribhco and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contract

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1994IIIAD(Delhi)221; 56(1994)DLT285

Advocate for Respondent : V.P. Singh and ; Manoj Chatterjee, Advs.

Mr. K. Shivashankar Bhat, J. 1. Petitioner challenges the action of the 1st respondent forwarding fresh tender forms for the work of Handling and Transportation work (referred as H & T work) of fertilizer at rail...

G. Chandrasekar Vs. Csir and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2001(60)DRJ284

Advocate for Respondent : Manoj Chatterjee, Adv.

Khan, J.1. Petitioner, facing a departmental inquiry, complained of non-supply of some relied upon documents and filed OA. 1293/99 for that, which was disposed of by Tribunal by order dated 28.11.2000 directing Respondents to call upon...