Advanced Search Results

Hardayal Singh Mehta and Another Vs. M.C.D. and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 3, 12, 44, 54, 151, 169, 247D, 336, 343, 347-C and 457; Constitution of India - Articles 136(1), 226 and 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193, 196 and 228; Delhi Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 7; Delhi Municipal Corporation Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1986 - Rules 13, 14 and 17; Punjab Welfare Officers Recruitment and Conditions of Service Rules, 1952 - Rule 6(6); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 15 and 18; Industrial Disputes Amendment Act, 1956 - Sections 18(3) and 19(3)

Reported in : AIR1990Delhi170

Advocate for Respondent : J.M. Sabharwal, ; Manmohan Kishan, ; R.K. Aggarwal and

ORDER1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged an order dated 24th of May, 1989 of the Appellate Tribunal constituted under Section 347A of the Delhi Municipal Corporation...

Lachhman Dass Deceased and ors. Vs. Veer Finance Company and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14(l) and 30; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 119

Reported in : AIR1983Delhi397; 23(1983)DLT231; 1983RLR109

Leila Seth, J.(1) This first appeal is directed against the judgment and order of Mr. S.C. Ahuja, Sub-Judge, 1st Class, Delhi dated 17th November, 1970. It raises an interesting point pertaining to the question of limitation...

Anwar Ali Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 139, 139(8), 148, 271, 271(1), 273, 273(1), 273A and 273A(4); Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 14(2), 17, 18(1) and 18(2A)

Reported in : [1992]196ITR354(AP)

Syed Shah Mohammed Qadri, J.(1) This is an application to call for the records of the Commissioner of Income-tax, A.P. II, Hyderabad, the first respondent herein, in Hqrs. II/85-A (155 to 158) of 1987, dated September...

Malkiat Singh Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 5

Reported in : AIR1969P& H250

Advocate for Respondent : G.S. Chawla, Adv. for;Adv. General

Sandhawalia, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was admitted to hearing by a Division Bench as on the averments made therein important issues pertaining to the nationality and the domicile of...

Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras and Another Vs. M/S. Dalmia Cement ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1922 - Sections - 6, 12B (1), 22(1), 23(2), 24(3), 27, 30, 66(1), 71, 72, 80 and 139(3); Income -tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143(3), 144, 157 and 246

Reported in : AIR1995SC2453; (1995)128CTR(SC)120; [1995]216ITR79(SC); JT1995(6)SC60; 1995(4)SCALE727; (1995)6SCC256; [1995]Supp2SCR708

Advocate for Respondent : Hari Har Lal, ; R.K. Maheswari and ; Vineet Maheshwari, Ad

ORDERB.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.1. Cardozo, J. had once exclaimed: 'The precedents have turn upon us and they are engulfing and annihilating us, engulfing and annihilating the very devotees that worshipped at their share'. We were inclined...

Subhash Chander Vs. Rehmat Ullah

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 37(2); Delhi Rent Control Rules, 1959 - Rule 23; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order, Rule 13; Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 17(1)

Reported in : ILR1973Delhi181; 1972RLR154

T.P.S. Chawla, J. (1) In these two appeals (S.A.OS. Nos. 150 and 151 of 1971) certain questions have arisen under the Delhi Rent Control Act 1958 which Mr. Justice V. S. Deshpande has referred for consideration...

Maharashtra Power Development Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Dabhol Power Company

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 260, 262, 286, 397 and 621A - Schedule - Regulations 72 and 75

Reported in : 2004(3)BomCR317; (2004)3CompLJ58(Bom); [2004]52SCL224(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : P. Chidambaram and ;Manmohan, Advs.

R.M. Lodha, J.1. The Maharashtra Power Development Corporation (MPDC) is the appellant; which we shall call 'the petitioner'. The company petition for diverse reliefs was filed by the petitioner under Sections 397, 402, 403 and 406...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Maddi Venkataratnam and Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37, 37(2), 37(2B), 37(3), 37(4) and 263

Reported in : 1996(1)AnWR66; [1996]217ITR571(AP)

Advocate for Respondent : D. Manmohan, Adv.

Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J. 1. The questions referred to us under S. 256(1) of the IT Act, 1961, at the instance of the assessee, are as follows : '1. Whether, on the facts and in...

K.K. Modi and anr. Vs. K.N. Modi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

Reported in : [2003]115CompCas671(Delhi); 2002(64)DRJ538; [2003]45SCL509(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : Manmohan, Adv.

J.D. Kapoor, J. 1. Modipon Limited has two divisions, Chemical division and Fibre division. Chemical divisionis controlled and managed by Group 'A' company which is represented by Mr. M.K. Modi, defendant No. 2. Fibre Division is...

Chander Mohan Vs. Indian Oil Corporation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 86(2000)DLT746

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Manmohan Kalra, Adv.

ORDERManmohan Sarin, J. 1. Petitioner's grievance is against the non-consideration of his tender. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been excluded from consideration on the ground that in his bid out of the...