Advanced Search Results
Satguru Distributors Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Castrol India Ltd.
Jharkhand
Feb-09-2005
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 8; Constitution of India - Article 226
III(2005)BC278; [2005(2)JCR9(Jhr)]
V. Shivnath, Sr. Adv.
ORDERNarendra Nath Tiwari, J.1. In this writ application the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 6.8.2004 passed in Money Suit No. 36/2002 passed by Sub-Judg-II, Dhanbad whereby the Court below has allowed the application...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSantosh Kumar Jaiswal Vs. Sidheshwar Pd. Singh and anr.
Jharkhand
Jul-12-2006
PropertyContract
Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3 and 54; Civil Procedute Code - Sections 47 - Order 22, Rule 9
[2006(4)JCR362(Jhr)]
Manjul Pd., Sr. Adv. and; Manoj Kr., Adv.
Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.1. This civil revision arises out of an order dated 25.1.06 passed in Execution Case No. 4/04 by the Sub-Judge-III, Ranchi whereby the petitioner's objection under Section 47 C.P.C has been rejected.2. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuresh Prasad and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Jharkhand
May-05-2005
Service
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 21
[2005(2)JCR466(Jhr)]
Manjul Pd., Sr. Adv. (SCL and C),; S.K. Verma, SC (Mines) and;
Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.1. In all these writ applications, the petitioners have a common grievance and the common questions of law, based on identical facts, have been raised and as such the same are being taken...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shiv Chandra Mishra Vs. State of Jharkhand
Jharkhand
May-05-2005
Service
2005(3)BLJR2014; [2005(3)JCR167(Jhr)]
Manjul Pd., Sr. Adv. and;S.C. (L & C)
ORDERNarendra Nath Tiwari, J.1. In this writ application the petitioner has prayed for quashing the letter dated 3.2.2004 (Annexure-22) issued by the respondent No. 2 whereby the petitioner's services have been terminated on the ground that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJyotilal Singh Vs. Srikant Singh and anr.
Jharkhand
Feb-25-2005
Civil
Santhal Parganas Tenancy (Supplementary Provisions) Act, 1949 - Sections 4(7), 5, 6 and 63
[2005(3)JCR316(Jhr)]
Manjul Prasad, Sr. Adv.,; Swami Nath Prasad Roy and; Man
ORDERN.N. Tiwari, J.1. At the time of admission of this appeal, two substantial questions were framed :--'(i). Whether the S.D.O. had the right to entertain and dispose of the suit without indicating that power was delegated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›