Advanced Search Results

Dharmendra Kumar Tandon vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

$~ * + STATE % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A10532018 DHARMENDRA KUMAR TANDON ..... Appellant Through Mr. Manu Sharma with Ms.Ridhima Mandhar, Mr.Kartik Khanna, Mr.Vijay Singh, Mr.Arjun Kakkar and Ms.Nishruta, Advocates....

M/S Verma Brothers and Another Vs. R.K. Chabbra (Dead) Through Lrs

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM Nos.17772-73-CII of 2012 in/and CR No.4251 of 2012 Date of decision: 4th October, 2013 M/s Verma Brothers and another Petitioners Versus R.K.Chabbra (dead) through LRs...

Kamal Singh Vs. Nokia Care and Another

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

Subject : MRTP

Maj. Gen. S.P. Kapoor, Presiding Member: 1. This is an appeal against the order of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh (for short hereinafter to be referred as District Forum) dated 17.10.2008 passed in Complaint...

Manish Joshi & Ors. Vs.state Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:16. h August, 2017 + W.P.(CRL) 2310/2017 MANISH JOSHI & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF...

Anil More Vs. Pradeepkumar Baduka and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 204 and 245(2)

Reported in : 2004(4)MPHT434; 2004(4)MPLJ539

Advocate for Respondent : Manish Joshi, Adv. in Criminal Revision No. 883/2003 for the Respondent No. 1, ;A. Arora, Adv. in Criminal Revision No. 884/2003 for the Respondent No. 1 and ;S.K. Jain, Adv. in Criminal Revision No.

ORDERS.L. Kochar, J.1. This order passed in Cr. Revision No. 883/2003 shall also govern the disposal of Cr. Revision Nos. 884/2003 and 885/2003 above because the applicant in all the three revisions is common, respondent Nos....

Sharad Madhavrao Patil Vs. Rohidas Chudaman Patil

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 81(3), 82, 83, 86, 86(1), 86(5), 100, 100(1), 101, 103, 117, 123(1), 123(2) and 123(8); Evidence Act, 1872; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - Rule 94A; Constitution of India - Article 324

Reported in : 2008(2)BomCR883

Advocate for Respondent : P.M. Shah, Sr. C. and; P.D. Sangavikar, Adv.

Patil Naresh H., J.1. The petitioner in this election petition challenges the election of the respondent from 88-Kusumba Legislative Assembly Constituency in Dhule District on the ground of corrupt practices as enumerated under the provisions of...

Narendra Ganatra Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India and Others

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : MRTP

Per: P. K. Malhotra, Member 1. The appellant before us is said to be an investor carrying on trading and investment in equity shares of different companies at Mumbai. It is alleged against the appellant that...

Bhavesh Pabari Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Prateek Seksaria

P. K. Malhotra 1. This appeal has been filed under Section 15T of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (the Act) against the order dated March 10, 2011 passed by the adjudicating officer...

Rohan Mehta and Another Vs. Shri V.K. Sharma and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

MANMOHAN,J. (ORAL): At the outset, Mr. N.K. Bhola states that a typographical error has crept in the order dated 30th April, 2012 inasmuch as the direction for attachment of personal bank account of Mr. Satinder Dutta,...

Deepak Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:17. 01.2014 + CRL.A. 166/2010 DEEPAK STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr Medhanshu Tripathi, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP...