Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: manindra nath ghose · Page 1 of about 36 results (0.037 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 05 1985

Sukumar Adhikary and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-05-1985

Subject : Property

Acts : West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1954 - Section 5

Reported in : AIR1986Cal261

Advocate for Respondent : Debaprasad Mukherjee, Advs.

ORDERMukul Gopal Mukherji, J.1. The dispute centres around a plot of land in dag No. 1382 of mouza Rajarampur within Police Station Sutahata, The respondents Nos. 3 and 4 were admittedly big raiyats. They did not...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 1974

Shri Radha Gobinda Jew and ors. Vs. Sm. Kewala Devi Jaiswal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-13-1974

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Transfer of Property Act - Section 35; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 14, Rule 1; ;Hindu Law; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 58, 94 and 96; ;Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 34

Reported in : AIR1974Cal283

Advocate for Respondent : Amar Nath Banerjee, Adv., ;Dipankar Chakravarty, Adv. (for No. 3), ;Shyamacharan Mitter and ;K.D. Jaiswal, Advs. (for No. 1)

Deb, J. 1. This Letters Patent Appeal arises out of the Title Suit No. 101 of 1967 of the Court of the learned Munsif at Krishnagore filed by the appellants for a declaration that the premises...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 1977

Siddheswar Prasad Singh Vs. Bhaba Sundari Pramanick Sha and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-21-1977

Subject : ContractProperty

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45 and 114; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 100

Reported in : AIR1978Cal4

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Mitra, ;Paramesh Chatterjee, Advs. (for No. 1), ;A.K. Dutt, ;C.D. Roychowdhury and ;Dipankar Chakravarty, Advs. (for No. 2)

B.C. Ray, J.1. This appeal is at the instance of the plaintiff, Siddheswar Prasad Singh and it arises out of the judgment and decree dated 31st of July, 1971 passed by the Additional District Judge, First...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 24 1971

Baijnath Prasad Surajlal Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-24-1971

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Section 72

Reported in : AIR1971Cal321

Advocate for Respondent : Ajoy K. Basu, Adv.

ORDERS.K. Chakravarti, J. 1. This Rule was issued at the instance of a plaintiff whose suit for damages against the Union of India representing the Railways was dismissed by the courts below on the ground that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 04 1976

Lalit Mohun Dutta Vs. Basudeb Dutta and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-04-1976

Subject : ContractCivil

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Section 25(1); ;Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 - Section 19

Reported in : AIR1976Cal430,80CWN774

Advocate for Respondent : Mahindra Nath Ghosh and ;Manoranjan Das, Advs.

ORDERSalil Kumar Datta, J.1. This Rule was obtained against the judgment and order of the Full Bench of the Court of Small Causes, Calcutta, dated June 12, 1974. By that order the defendants' application under Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 1984

Ashutosh Seal Vs. Smt. Umashasi Santra

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-30-1984

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Section 61

Reported in : AIR1984Cal223

Advocate for Respondent : Mono Mohan Mukherjee and ;Gouri Prasad Mukherjee, Advs.

Bankim Chandra Ray, J.1. This appeal is against the judgment and decree passed in Probate Suit No. 3 of 1971 by the 1st Court of Additional District Judge at Howrah dismissing the said suit with costs.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 1971

Nrimal Kumar Moulik and ors. Vs. Sm. Champabala Roy and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-25-1971

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 115

Reported in : AIR1971Cal407,76CWN556

Advocate for Respondent : Hariprasanna Mukherji, ;Bhupendra Kumar Panda and ;Jayindranath Nanda, Advs.

Salil Kumar Datta, J.1. This is an appeal by defendants Nos. 1 to 11 against a judgment of concurrence decreeing the plaintiff's suit. The suit property is comprised in C. S. Plot No. 1158, khatian No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 16 1978

Shiba Prosanna Banerjee Vs. Mrityunjoy Khan and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-16-1978

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : West Bengal Non-Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1949 - Section 24; ;West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1954 - Section 4

Reported in : AIR1978Cal428,82CWN1052

M.M. Dutt, J. 1. The only question that is involved in these Rules is, whether on the partition of the land comprised in the tenancy of non-agricultural tenants without the knowledge and consent of the landlord,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 1962

Sudhir Kumar Bose Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-06-1962

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 16, 226 and 309; ;West Bengal Civil Services Rules - Rule 24; ;Civil Service (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules - Rule 22

Reported in : AIR1962Cal587

Advocate for Respondent : J. Majumdar and ;Somendra Chandra Bose, Advs.

ORDERB.N. Banerjee, J. 1. In the year 1934 the petitioner obtained his first temporary appointment as a lower division clerk in the Khulna Collectorate on a scale of pay of Rs. 35-80/-, thereafter revised to Rs....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 1961

Gopendra Nath Basu Malik Vs. Sm. Prativa Rani Basu Mallik

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-10-1961

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 24 and 28; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 115

Reported in : AIR1962Cal455,66CWN388

Advocate for Respondent : Manindra Nath Ghose and ;Sourindra Nath Roy Choudhary, Advs.

ORDERP.N. Mookerjee, J.1. This Rule arises out of a proceeding under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Before the District Judge, 24 Parganas, the present petitioner, who is the husband, applied for restitution! of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial