Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: manick lal mukherjee · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.055 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 05 1951

Dr. Surendra Nath Mandal and ors. Vs. Ram Chandra Awasthi and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-05-1951

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Bengal Municipal Act, 1932 - Section 548(2)

Reported in : AIR1951Cal504

Advocate for Respondent : Chandra Sekhar Sen, Sr. Govt. Pleader and ;Jogneswar Majumdar, Adv. for No. 2 and ;Purnendu Sekhar Basu, ;S.K. Roy Chaudhury and ;Manick Lal Mukherjee, Advs. for No. 1

ORDERBose, J.1. This is an appln. under Art. 226 of the Const. Ind. for order on the opposite party No. 2, the Addl. Dist. Mag. of 24-Parganas, to show cause why certain orders made by him...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 1967

P.E. Davis and Co. Vs. Kesto Routh

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-03-1967

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 4(1) and 24A; ;Bengal Workmen's Compensation (Amendment) Act

Reported in : AIR1968Cal129,(1968)IILLJ393Cal

Advocate for Respondent : Manick Lal Mukherjee, Adv.

A.K. Mukherjea, J. 1. There is an appeal against the judgment and order dated 30th November, 1960 passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation. 2. The facts of the case are as follows: The petitioner Kesto...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 1998

M/S. Anandilal Poddar and Sons Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Sanchaita Invest ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-21-1998

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Prize Chit and Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1978;; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 2;; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3, 40, 54 and 55(6);; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 39, 53, 55 and 62;; Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Section 17(1);; Companies Act, 1956

Reported in : (1999)3CALLT177(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Anandya Kr. Mitra, ;Mr. Asim Banerjee, ;Mr. S.K. Basu and ;Mr. D. Basak, Advs.

D.B. Dutta, J.1. The present matter arises out of the objection preferred by M/s Anadilal Poddar and Sons Limited, a Company incorporated under the Companies Act having its registered office at 36, Chowringhee Road, Calcutta (herein...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial