Advanced Search Results

Burrabazar Fire Works Dealers Association and ors. Vs. the Commissione ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : EnvironmentConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 21; ;Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Section 2; ;Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 - Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1998Cal121

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Kapoor, Adv. for Mohan Fire Works, ;Debol Banerjee, ;Biswanath Samaddar and ;Manick Chandra Das, Advs.

ORDER1. Two matters were heard together. One is an application filed by Mohan Fire Works and Chandan Golcha carrying on the business under the name and style of Chandan Mal Golcha for addition of party respondents...

State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Sanjeevani Projects (P) Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : West Bengal Land Reforms (WBLR) Act, 1955 - Sections 1, 1(3), 2(7), 2(10), 3A, 4, 4(4), 4B, 4C, 4D and 54; ;West Bengal Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1981 - Section and 2(7); ;Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 4; ;West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973 - Sections 4(5) and 23; ;Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Section 3(1) and 3(2); ;Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 - Rule 5(3); ;West Bengal Land Reforms (WBLR) (Amendment) Act, 1974; ;West Bengal Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 2000; ;West Bengal Inland Fisheries (Amendment) Act, 1993; ;West Bengal Inland Fisheries Act, 1984 - Sections 2, 17A and 17A(1); ;West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 - Sections 5(1) and 6; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 21, 48A, 51A, 226 and 254(2); ;West Bengal Town and Country (Planning a

Reported in : 2006(1)CHN241

Advocate for Respondent : Sakti Nath Mukherjee, ;Pratap Chatterjee, ;Jayanta Banerjee, ;Pramit Kumar Ray and ;S.K. Kanodia, Advs. in APOT No. 250 of 2005, GA No. 1224 of 2005 and WP No. 352 of 2005 and ;Samaraditya Pal, ;Utpal

D.K. Seth, J. Prelude:1. These two appeals involve identical question of law and fact. Therefore both these matters were taken up and heard simultaneously. The appeals arise out of the interim orders granted by the learned...

Haran Chandra Ghosh Vs. State of West Bengal and ors

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : The West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973 - Sections 2(10, 11 and 15B), 3, 3(1 and 3), 4, 4(1, 2, 3 and 5), 5, 5(4), 7, 197B and 197B(2);; West Bengal Municipal Act, 1993 - Sections 3, 9, 354 and 533;; Constitution of India - Article 226;; West Bengal Panchayet (Constitution) Rules, 1975;; Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act - Sections 9(1 and 2), 12A(2) and 13(4)

Reported in : (1998)1CALLT113(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. B.R. Bhattacharya and ;Mr. Dilip Kumar Chatterjee, Advs.;Mr. Manick Das and ;Mr. Goutam Mukherjee, Advs.

ORDERS. Banerjea, J.1. In the instant writ application the petitioner who was admittedly elected Pradhan of Madral Panpur Gram Panchayet (hereinafter referred to as the said Gram Panchayet) has challenged the notification dated 16th October. 1995,...

Ballygunge Siksha Samity and ors. Vs. Ms. Susmita Basu and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : constitutionService

Acts : West Bengal Board of Secondary Education Act, 1963 - Section 18;; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 18, 30, 30(1), 32, 39, 43 and 226;; Management of Recognised Non Government Institutions (Aided and Unaided) Rules, 1969 - Rules 2, 6, 6-A, 23(4), 28, 28(9), 29(4 and 8) and 214;; Societies Registration Act, 1860;; Companies Act, 1956;; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960;; Banking Regulation Act, 1949;; West Bengal School Service Commission Act, 1997;; Code of Regulations for Angle-Indian and Other Listed Schools, 1993 - Regulation 20;; Provident Fund Act, 1925;; Delhi School Education Act, 1973 - Sections 10 and 12;; Uttar Pradesh Recognised Basic Schools (Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Teachers and other conditions) Rules, 1975 - Rule 10(2);; Industrial

Reported in : (2000)2CALLT484(HC),2000(1)CHN635

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharjee, ;Mr. Pradip Tarafdar and ;Mr. Indrajit Dasgupta, Advs.

A. Kabir, J.1. The respondents Nos. 1 to 5 in this appeal were among 21 members of the leaching staff of an educational Institution known as Ballygunge Siksha Sadan' run by the appellant No.1 Society at...

Tapas Kumar Chatterjee Vs. State

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : (2008)1CALLT499(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Manick Chandra Das, ;Manas Das and ;Sumana Sha, Advs. for Respondent Nos. 10 and 11, ;Subrata Mukherjee and ;Basabi Roy Chowdhury, Advs. for Respondent No. 12 and ;Balai Chandra Roy, ;Sandip Srimani a

Surinder Singh Nijjar, C.J.1. We have heard the petitioner in person, who is an Advocate of this Court. He has filed this writ petition purportedly claiming to be in public interest. He has submitted that the...

Purna Chandra Ghorai and ors. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19, 21, 162 and 226

Reported in : (2003)1CALLT496(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Manick Chandra Das and ;Sujit Mitra, Advs., ;Alok Kumar Ghosh and ;Mantu Ranjan Das, Advs. for Repondent Nos. 7 to 9 and ;A.P. Lahiri and ;Ajay Debnath, Advs.

P.K. Ray, J. 1. Heard the learned advocate for all the parties.2. In this writ application, the petitioners who claim themselves as organising teaching staff of upgraded class IX and X, which has since been recognised...

South Calcutta Hawkers Union and Others Vs. State of West Bengal and O ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ConstitutionProperty

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 226;; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 8;; Calcutta Municipal Act, 1980 - Sections 371 to 373

Reported in : AIR1997Cal110

Advocate for Respondent : Naranarayan Gooptu, Adv. General, ;Indrajit Sen, ;Manick Chandra Das, ;Tarun Chandra Dutta, ;Tarun Kumar Roy, ;Aloke Kumar Biswas, ;Mrs. Rekha (Sarkar) Ghosh, and Suman Ghosh, Advs.

ORDER1. Heard the submissions of the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Ajit Kumar Panja, learned Advocate-General for the State of West Bengal and the learned Senior Counsel for the Calcutta Municipal Corportion, Mr. Anindya...

Sayed Ali and ors. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Advocate for Respondent : Arindam Chatterjee, ;Kaman Sahoo, Advs. in MAT 1223/2009, ;Chitta Ranjan Chakraborty, ;Parvej Anam, Advs. in Respondent No. 9 in AST 1038/2009, ;Manick Chandra Das and ;Subrata Banerjee, Advs. for Sta

Bhaskar Bhattacharya, A.C.J.1. Both the appeals were taken up together as the order impugned in these two appeals is the same one being order dated 17th November, 2009 passed by a learned Single Judge of this...

Rekha Mukherjee Vs. Ashis Kumar Das and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CivilContract

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 280A; Calcutta Thika Tenancy (Acquisition and Regulation) Act, 1981; Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 136; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 53A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(2), 47, 96 and 151 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 21, Rules 95 and 97 to 101 - Order 23, Rule 1, 1(3) and 1(4) - Order 41 - Order 47, Rules 1, 4, 7 and 8 - Order 96

Reported in : AIR2005SC1944; 2005(3)AWC2920(SC); (SCSuppl)2005(2)CHN148; [2005(2)JCR319(SC)]; JT2005(3)SC68; (2005)2MLJ147(SC); (2005)3SCC427; 2005(1)LC723(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : G.L. Sanghi, Sr. Adv., ; J.L. De, ; Nandini Mukherjee, ;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Both these appeals being inter-related were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.BACKGROUND FACT :3. The Appellant is the owner of a premise situate...

Sanjit Kumar Sheet Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service

Reported in : (2008)2CALLT461(HC),2008(3)CHN20

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Basu, ;Indrani Pal, ;Amal Baran Chatterjee and ;Bhaskar Ch. Manna, Advs.

Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J.1. Both the appeals have been preferred at the instance of the same appellant. These appeals were heard analogously since the facts involved in the said appeals are almost identical and the issues...