Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mangha ram · Page 1 of about 14 results (0.028 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 24 1968

State of Rajasthan Vs. Chhattar Singh

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-24-1968

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2(1), 7, 16 and 23

Reported in : AIR1968Raj233; 1968CriLJ1214

Advocate for Respondent : Mangha Ram, Adv.

Lodha, J. 1. Accused Chattar Singh was prosecuted in the court of City Magistrate, Bharatpur, by the Municipal Council, Bharatpur, for an offence under Section 7(1) read with Section 16(1)(a) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 1997

Temple of Thakurji Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-30-1997

Subject : Civil

Acts : Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 - Sections 46; Constitution of India - Article 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(9)

Reported in : AIR1998Raj85; 1997(2)WLN535

Advocate for Respondent : Prakash Tatia and; S.G. Ojha, Advs.

ORDERB.S. Chauhan, J.1. The instant writ petition has been filed against the Judgment and order dated 10-6-94 in Appeal No. 6/89 by which the Board of Revenue has reversed the order of the Revenue Appellate Authority...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 1984

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Ram Chand and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-30-1984

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 14; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rule 22

Reported in : 1985(1)Crimes501; ILR1984Delhi775

R.N. Aggarwal, J.(1) This is an appeal by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi against the judgment dated April 1, 1977 of Mr. P. K. Bahri, Additional Sessions Judge, acquitting the respondents Ram Chand and Mangha Ram...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 05 1958

The Hyderabad (Sind) Electric Supply Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-05-1958

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Disposed Persons (Claims) Supplementary Act, 1954 - Sections 5, 5(1), 10(1) and 12; Displaced Persons (Claims) Act, 1950 - Sections 2 and 6; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Displaced Persons (Verification of Claims) Supplementary Rules, 1954 - Rule 18; Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 23 and 277; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1956 - Sections 34 and 592; Debt Law; Displaced Persons (Debts Adjustment) Act, 1951 - Sections 2(1) and 43

Reported in : AIR1959P& H199

Advocate for Respondent : Bishambar Dayal and; Keshav Dayal, Advs.

ORDERBishan Narain, J.1. The facts leading to this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution are not in dispute. The Hyderabad (Sind) Electric Supply Company, Limited, was registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 1960

Hiranand Vs. the Azad Hind Refugee Co-operative Stores Ltd. and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-12-1960

Subject : Civil

Acts : Debt Law; Displaced Persons (Debts Adjustment) Act, 1951- Sections 2(4), 2(10), 10 and 13

Reported in : AIR1961Raj233

L.N. Chhangani, J. 1. This is an appeal by Hiranand the petitioner in the original court against the order of the Civil Judge, Ajmer (Tribunal under the Displaced Persons Debts Adjustment Act -- hereinafter referred as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 21 1950

Nisar Ahmed Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-21-1950

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 5, 6, 7, 19, 19(1) and 19(5); Influx from Pakistan (Control) Act, 1949 - Sections 1; Influx from Pakistan (Control) Ordinance, 1948 - Sections 1; Permit System Rules, 1948 - Rule 16; Permit System (Amendment) Rules, 1950 - Rule 10

Reported in : AIR1958Raj65; 1958CriLJ418

Advocate for Respondent : Mangha Ram, Govt. Adv.

Bapna, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, presented on 12-5-1950. The petitioner Nisar Ahmad claims that he is a citizen of India inasmuch as he and his family were...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 1963

Municipal Council Vs. Rama and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-31-1963

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 242 and 243; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 7 and 16

Reported in : AIR1965Raj107; 1965CriLJ599

Advocate for Respondent : Mangha Ram, Adv.

Bhandari, J. 1. This is a Reference by the Sessions Judge, Ajmer, recommending that the sentence of the accused Rama be enhanced to one week's rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 200, and in default...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2005

Him Air Products (P.) Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh

Decided on : Oct-07-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)7SOT197(Chd.)

The appeal of the assessee for assessment year 1995-96 is directed against the order dated 13-1-2004 of Commissioner (Appeals), Shimla.The dispute involved in this appeal is relating to penalty of Rs. 4,82,560 imposed under section 271(1)(c)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 2006

Mrs. Asha Devi Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-24-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)101TTJ(Delhi)332

1. The appeal in IT(SS) 362/Del/04 for block period 1st April, 95 to 26th Feb., 2002 is against the order of CIT(A)-II, New Delhi dt. 22nd Sept., 2004, alleging that both the taxing authorities have erred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2007

Jai Parkash Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh

Decided on : Apr-25-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)116TTJ(Chd.)269

1. This appeal is by the assessee challenging the order of the learned CIT(A), dt. 19th Sept., 2005. During arguments, we have heard Shri Ashwani Kumar learned Counsel for the assessee and Dr. Rajiv Harit learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial