Advanced Search Results
State of Rajasthan Vs. Chhattar Singh
Rajasthan
Jan-24-1968
CriminalFood Adulteration
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2(1), 7, 16 and 23
AIR1968Raj233; 1968CriLJ1214
Mangha Ram, Adv.
Lodha, J. 1. Accused Chattar Singh was prosecuted in the court of City Magistrate, Bharatpur, by the Municipal Council, Bharatpur, for an offence under Section 7(1) read with Section 16(1)(a) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTemple of Thakurji Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Sep-30-1997
Civil
Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 - Sections 46; Constitution of India - Article 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(9)
AIR1998Raj85; 1997(2)WLN535
Prakash Tatia and; S.G. Ojha, Advs.
ORDERB.S. Chauhan, J.1. The instant writ petition has been filed against the Judgment and order dated 10-6-94 in Appeal No. 6/89 by which the Board of Revenue has reversed the order of the Revenue Appellate Authority...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunicipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Ram Chand and ors.
Delhi
Jan-30-1984
CriminalFood Adulteration
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 14; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rule 22
1985(1)Crimes501; ILR1984Delhi775
R.N. Aggarwal, J.(1) This is an appeal by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi against the judgment dated April 1, 1977 of Mr. P. K. Bahri, Additional Sessions Judge, acquitting the respondents Ram Chand and Mangha Ram...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Hyderabad (Sind) Electric Supply Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ...
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-05-1958
Constitution
Disposed Persons (Claims) Supplementary Act, 1954 - Sections 5, 5(1), 10(1) and 12; Displaced Persons (Claims) Act, 1950 - Sections 2 and 6; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Displaced Persons (Verification of Claims) Supplementary Rules, 1954 - Rule 18; Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 23 and 277; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1956 - Sections 34 and 592; Debt Law; Displaced Persons (Debts Adjustment) Act, 1951 - Sections 2(1) and 43
AIR1959P& H199
Bishambar Dayal and; Keshav Dayal, Advs.
ORDERBishan Narain, J.1. The facts leading to this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution are not in dispute. The Hyderabad (Sind) Electric Supply Company, Limited, was registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, with...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHiranand Vs. the Azad Hind Refugee Co-operative Stores Ltd. and anr.
Rajasthan
Dec-12-1960
Civil
Debt Law; Displaced Persons (Debts Adjustment) Act, 1951- Sections 2(4), 2(10), 10 and 13
AIR1961Raj233
L.N. Chhangani, J. 1. This is an appeal by Hiranand the petitioner in the original court against the order of the Civil Judge, Ajmer (Tribunal under the Displaced Persons Debts Adjustment Act -- hereinafter referred as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNisar Ahmed Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Rajasthan
Nov-21-1950
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 5, 6, 7, 19, 19(1) and 19(5); Influx from Pakistan (Control) Act, 1949 - Sections 1; Influx from Pakistan (Control) Ordinance, 1948 - Sections 1; Permit System Rules, 1948 - Rule 16; Permit System (Amendment) Rules, 1950 - Rule 10
AIR1958Raj65; 1958CriLJ418
Mangha Ram, Govt. Adv.
Bapna, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, presented on 12-5-1950. The petitioner Nisar Ahmad claims that he is a citizen of India inasmuch as he and his family were...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunicipal Council Vs. Rama and anr.
Rajasthan
Jul-31-1963
CriminalFood Adulteration
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 242 and 243; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 7 and 16
AIR1965Raj107; 1965CriLJ599
Mangha Ram, Adv.
Bhandari, J. 1. This is a Reference by the Sessions Judge, Ajmer, recommending that the sentence of the accused Rama be enhanced to one week's rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 200, and in default...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHim Air Products (P.) Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Cit
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh
Oct-07-2005
Direct Taxation
(2006)7SOT197(Chd.)
The appeal of the assessee for assessment year 1995-96 is directed against the order dated 13-1-2004 of Commissioner (Appeals), Shimla.The dispute involved in this appeal is relating to penalty of Rs. 4,82,560 imposed under section 271(1)(c)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMrs. Asha Devi Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Feb-24-2006
Direct Taxation
(2006)101TTJ(Delhi)332
1. The appeal in IT(SS) 362/Del/04 for block period 1st April, 95 to 26th Feb., 2002 is against the order of CIT(A)-II, New Delhi dt. 22nd Sept., 2004, alleging that both the taxing authorities have erred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJai Parkash Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh
Apr-25-2007
Direct Taxation
(2008)116TTJ(Chd.)269
1. This appeal is by the assessee challenging the order of the learned CIT(A), dt. 19th Sept., 2005. During arguments, we have heard Shri Ashwani Kumar learned Counsel for the assessee and Dr. Rajiv Harit learned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »